Literature DB >> 24460509

Comparison of video, optical, and direct laryngoscopy by experienced tactical paramedics.

Brian J Yun, Calvin A Brown, Christopher J Grazioso, Charles N Pozner, Ali S Raja.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: While optical and video laryngoscopy have been studied in the emergency department, the operating room, and the routine prehospital setting, their efficacy in the tactical environment--in which operator safety is as important as intubation success--has not been evaluated. This study compared direct laryngoscopes to optical (AirTraq) and video (King Vision) laryngoscopes in a simulated tactical setting.
METHODS: This prospective institutional review board-approved simulation study evaluated each of the laryngoscopes in the hands of seven experienced tactical paramedics. After a one-hour training session, each tactical paramedic used each of the laryngoscopes, in a random order, on each of four different airway manikins. A tactical environment was simulated using auditory and visual immersion, and the intubations occurred on the ground with the paramedics in full tactical gear. Outcomes included time to successful ventilation, first-pass success rate, Cormack-Lehane grade, and intubator head height during the intubation. Statistical analysis included chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine contributing factors to outcomes with significant variation.
RESULTS: A total of 84 intubations were performed by seven tactical paramedics. While there were no significant differences in time to successful ventilation or first-pass success rate, the optical and video laryngoscopes had significantly better Cormack-Lehane grades, defined as grade I or II (100% for both compared to 85.7%), while direct laryngoscopy resulted in significantly less maximum vertical exposure of the intubator (51.82 cm compared to AirTraq's 56.64 cm and King Vision's 56.13 cm).
CONCLUSION: Video and optical laryngoscopes can be used successfully by experienced tactical paramedics in a simulated tactical setting. The King Vision and AirTraq resulted in improved Cormack-Lehane glottic views but similar times to ventilation and first-pass success compared to direct laryngoscopy. Intubator head height was lower with direct laryngoscopy. Clarifying the role of optical and video laryngoscopes in a tactical environment, especially in the hands of less experienced intubators, requires further research.

Keywords:  airway management; intubation; simulation; tactical medicine; video laryngoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24460509     DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2013.864356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  6 in total

1.  The AirView Study: Comparison of Intubation Conditions and Ease between the Airtraq-AirView and the King Vision.

Authors:  Patrick Schoettker; Jocelyn Corniche
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Endotracheal intubation with a video-assisted semi-rigid fiberoptic stylet by prehospital providers.

Authors:  Derek R Cooney; Charles Beaudette; Brian M Clemency; Christopher Tanski; Susan Wojcik
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-26

3.  Video Laryngoscopy Using King Vision™ aBlade™ and Direct Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Airway Management: A Randomized Controlled Study about Device Learning by Anaesthesia Residents.

Authors:  Katharina Epp; Sophie Zimmermann; Eva Wittenmeier; Marc Kriege; Frank Dette; Irene Schmidtmann; Nina Pirlich
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Using King Vision video laryngoscope with a channeled blade prolongs time for tracheal intubation in different training levels, compared to non-channeled blade.

Authors:  Marc Kriege; Christian Alflen; Ruediger R Noppens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy by German paramedics during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation; an observational prospective study.

Authors:  Joachim Risse; Christian Volberg; Thomas Kratz; Birgit Plöger; Andreas Jerrentrup; Dirk Pabst; Clemens Kill
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2020-03-23

6.  [Comparison of King Vision video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial].

Authors:  Basar Erdivanli; Ahmet Sen; Sule Batcik; Tolga Koyuncu; Hizir Kazdal
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-07-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.