OBJECTIVE: To establish through analysis of the radial pressure pulse waveform the dose dependent effects of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) on properties of different blood vessels. DESIGN: Radial pulse waveform was measured in randomised order before, during a five hour application of a GTN patch delivering 0.104-0.625 mg/h, and for two hours after patch removal. The radial pressure waveform (Millar applanation tonometer) was convolved into an ascending aortic wave using a generalised transfer function (SphygmoCor process) enabling measurement of aortic systolic, diastolic, pulse, mean, and augmented pressure and left ventricular ejection duration in addition to standard brachial cuff pressures. SETTING: Fu Wai and Ren Ming hospitals in Beijing, China. PATIENTS: 46 recumbent hospitalised patients aged 56 (9) years, awaiting electrophysiological or other diagnostic studies, fasting, and with other treatments suspended. MAJOR OUTCOME MEASURES: Conventional brachial pressure measures and data from the synthesised aortic pulse. RESULTS: There was no consistent change in heart rate or brachial pressures except for a decrease in systolic and pulse pressures (p < 0.01) at dose > 0.416 mg/h. In contrast, there were substantial and significant (p < 0.0001) decreases in aortic systolic, pulse, and augmented pressures at all doses, mean pressure (p < 0.001) at doses > 0.416 mg/h, and ejection duration (p < 0.001) at doses > 0.208 mg/h. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse waveform analysis exposes dose dependent effects of GTN on the aortic waveform, suggesting muscular conduit arterial dilatation with reduced wave reflection at the lowest dose, arteriolar dilatation and decreased peripheral resistance at the highest dose, and venous dilatation at the intermediate dose.
OBJECTIVE: To establish through analysis of the radial pressure pulse waveform the dose dependent effects of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) on properties of different blood vessels. DESIGN: Radial pulse waveform was measured in randomised order before, during a five hour application of a GTN patch delivering 0.104-0.625 mg/h, and for two hours after patch removal. The radial pressure waveform (Millar applanation tonometer) was convolved into an ascending aortic wave using a generalised transfer function (SphygmoCor process) enabling measurement of aortic systolic, diastolic, pulse, mean, and augmented pressure and left ventricular ejection duration in addition to standard brachial cuff pressures. SETTING: Fu Wai and Ren Ming hospitals in Beijing, China. PATIENTS: 46 recumbent hospitalised patients aged 56 (9) years, awaiting electrophysiological or other diagnostic studies, fasting, and with other treatments suspended. MAJOR OUTCOME MEASURES: Conventional brachial pressure measures and data from the synthesised aortic pulse. RESULTS: There was no consistent change in heart rate or brachial pressures except for a decrease in systolic and pulse pressures (p < 0.01) at dose > 0.416 mg/h. In contrast, there were substantial and significant (p < 0.0001) decreases in aortic systolic, pulse, and augmented pressures at all doses, mean pressure (p < 0.001) at doses > 0.416 mg/h, and ejection duration (p < 0.001) at doses > 0.208 mg/h. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse waveform analysis exposes dose dependent effects of GTN on the aortic waveform, suggesting muscular conduit arterial dilatation with reduced wave reflection at the lowest dose, arteriolar dilatation and decreased peripheral resistance at the highest dose, and venous dilatation at the intermediate dose.
Authors: K Takazawa; N Tanaka; M Fujita; O Matsuoka; T Saiki; M Aikawa; S Tamura; C Ibukiyama Journal: Hypertension Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: K Sudhir; J S MacGregor; S D Barbant; E Foster; P J Fitzgerald; K Chatterjee; P G Yock Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R David Anderson; B Clay Sizemore; Genevieve M Barrow; B Delia Johnson; C Noel Bairey Merz; George Sopko; Gregory O von Mering; Eileen M Handberg; Wilmer W Nichols; Carl J Pepine Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2008-09-18 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Thomas Weber; Irene Lang; Robert Zweiker; Sabine Horn; Rene R Wenzel; Bruno Watschinger; Jörg Slany; Bernd Eber; Franz Xaver Roithinger; Bernhard Metzler Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Thomas Weber; Siegfried Wassertheurer; Christopher C Mayer; Bernhard Hametner; Kathrin Danninger; Raymond R Townsend; Felix Mahfoud; Kazuomi Kario; Martin Fahy; Vanessa DeBruin; Nicole Peterson; Manuela Negoita; Michael A Weber; David E Kandzari; Roland E Schmieder; Konstantinos P Tsioufis; Ronald K Binder; Michael Böhm Journal: Hypertension Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 9.897
Authors: Carmel M McEniery; John R Cockcroft; Mary J Roman; Stanley S Franklin; Ian B Wilkinson Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Thomas R Everett; Ian B Wilkinson; Amita A Mahendru; Carmel M McEniery; Stephen F Garner; Alison H Goodall; Christoph C Lees Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 4.335