Literature DB >> 24458111

Short-term outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection performed by trainees.

Taku Sakamoto1, Chiko Sato, Makomo Makazu, Masau Sekiguchi, Genki Mori, Masayoshi Yamada, Yuzuru Kinjo, Eriko Turuki, Seiichiro Abe, Yosuke Otake, Takeshi Nakajima, Takahisa Matsuda, Yutaka Saito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a relatively new therapy that has been accepted as the most effective treatment procedure for superficial colorectal neoplasms. Given the increasing acceptance and use of this procedure worldwide, the outcomes of colorectal ESD performed by trainees should be understood from a practical perspective and for developing strategies to introduce ESD to trainees. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ESD when conducted by less-experienced endoscopists.
SUMMARY: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of 164 patients with 164 colorectal neoplasms who underwent ESD carried out by 20 trainees performing their first colorectal ESDs between April 2005 and March 2012. For each operator, clinical data were collected between the first and 30th cases. For evaluating the technical aspects of the ESD procedure, the endoscopic characteristics of the lesions, procedure time, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, invasion depth and complications were evaluated. The median procedure time was 95 min; about 75% of the lesions were resected within 120 min. Apparent perforation or electric damage in the muscularis propria was seen in 4% of lesions. In terms of factors with the potential to effect procedure time, lesion size and pathological invasion depth were significantly different between shorter and longer treatment times for granular-type laterally spreading tumors (LST). KEY MESSAGES: A granular-type LST of <40 mm is a good lesion for introducing colorectal ESD to trainees. Trainees should have a strong ability to make a depth diagnosis before starting ESD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24458111     DOI: 10.1159/000356215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digestion        ISSN: 0012-2823            Impact factor:   3.216


  9 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Past, Present, and Factors Impacting Future Dissemination.

Authors:  Jason Ferreira; Paul Akerman
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

Review 2.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: a review.

Authors:  Taku Sakamoto; Genki Mori; Masayoshi Yamada; Yuzuru Kinjo; Eriko So; Seiichiro Abe; Yosuke Otake; Takeshi Nakajima; Takahisa Matsuda; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection from a Western perspective: Today's promises and future challenges.

Authors:  José Carlos Marín-Gabriel; Gloria Fernández-Esparrach; José Díaz-Tasende; Alberto Herreros de Tejada
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-25

4.  Construction of a preoperative scoring system to predict the difficulty level of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Satohiro Matsumoto; Takeshi Uehara; Hirosato Mashima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends.

Authors:  Rupinder Mann; Mahesh Gajendran; Chandraprakash Umapathy; Abhilash Perisetti; Hemant Goyal; Shreyas Saligram; Juan Echavarria
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-20

6.  Usefulness of training using animal models for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: is experience performing gastric ESD really needed?

Authors:  Ken Ohata; Kouichi Nonaka; Yoshitsugu Misumi; Hiromichi Tsunashima; Maiko Takita; Yohei Minato; Tomoaki Tashima; Eiji Sakai; Takashi Muramoto; Yasushi Matsuyama; Yoshimitsu Hiejima; Nobuyuki Matsuhashi
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-02-10

7.  Safety and efficacy of simultaneous colorectal ESD for large synchronous colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Hideyuki Chiba; Jun Tachikawa; Daisuke Kurihara; Keiichi Ashikari; Toru Goto; Akihiro Takahashi; Eiji Sakai; Ken Ohata; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-06-23

8.  Perforation and Postoperative Bleeding Associated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Colorectal Tumors: An Analysis of 398 Lesions Treated in Saga, Japan.

Authors:  Koji Yamamoto; Ryo Shimoda; Shinichi Ogata; Megumi Hara; Yoichiro Ito; Naoyuki Tominaga; Atsushi Nakayama; Yasuhisa Sakata; Nanae Tsuruoka; Ryuichi Iwakiri; Kazuma Fujimoto
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 1.271

9.  Management of colorectal laterally spreading tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Russo; Sandra Barbeiro; Halim Awadie; Diogo Libânio; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Michael Bourke
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-01-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.