| Literature DB >> 24455225 |
Mariko Minatani1, Sachiko Kita1, Yukiko Ohashi2, Toshinori Kitamura3, Megumi Haruna4, Kyoko Sakanashi5, Tomoko Tanaka6.
Abstract
Background. To examine the effects of temperament and character domains on depression during pregnancy. Methods. We examined 601 pregnant women using a questionnaire that included the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI), and demographic variables. Results. In a hierarchical regression analysis, severity of depression during pregnancy was predicted by the women's negative response towards the current pregnancy, low self-directedness, and high harm avoidance, persistence, and self-transcendence. Conclusion. Depression during pregnancy is predicted by personality traits as well as women's negative attitudes towards the current pregnancy.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24455225 PMCID: PMC3881521 DOI: 10.1155/2013/140169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Depress Res Treat ISSN: 2090-1321
Means, SDs, and correlations of the variables used in this study (N = 608 to 633).
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| (1) EPDS | — | ||||||||||||||
| (2) NS | 0.15*** | — | |||||||||||||
| (3) HA | 0.35*** | −0.25*** | — | ||||||||||||
| (4) RD | −0.08 | 0.3 | −0.01 | — | |||||||||||
| (5) PS | 0.08 | −0.16*** | −0.03 | 0.11** | — | ||||||||||
| (6) SD | −0.56*** | −0.23*** | −0.48*** | 0.14** | 0.05 | — | |||||||||
| (7) CO | −0.29*** | −0.22*** | −0.25*** | 0.45*** | 0.18*** | 0.50*** | — | ||||||||
| (8) ST | 0.14** | 0.21*** | −0.22*** | 0.01 | 0.21 | −0.11** | 0.07 | — | |||||||
| (9) Age | −0.13** | −0.01 | −0.11** | −0.07 | 0.03 | 0.12** | 0.11* | 0.07 | — | ||||||
| (10) Partner's age | −0.09* | −0.03 | −0.13** | −0.13** | 0.03 | 0.12** | 0.05 | 0.09* | 0.68*** | — | |||||
| (11) No. of children | 0.05 | −0.04 | 0.4 | −0.03 | 0.04 | −0.02 | 0.03 | −0.03 | 0.21*** | 0.14** | — | ||||
| (12) Pregnancy complications | 0.04 | −0.06 | −0.01 | 0.03 | 0.04 | −0.01 | 0.09* | 0.07 | 0.11** | 0.11** | −0.01 | — | |||
| (13) Gestational week | −0.02 | −0.00 | −0.11** | −0.05 | 0.01 | 0.03 | −0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | −0.00 | −0.02 | −0.05 | — | ||
| (14) Response to pregnancy | 0.16*** | 0.04 | 0.03 | −0.12** | −0.06 | −0.11** | −0.09* | −0.08 | −0.03 | 0.01 | 0.26*** | −0.01 | 0.05 | — | |
| (15) Desire for baby | −0.13** | −0.05 | 0.00 | 0.08* | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.21*** | 0.15*** | −0.18*** | 0.6 | −0.04 | −0.47*** | — |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Mean | 4.5 | 25.5 | 33.1 | 29.0 | 16.3 | 43.7 | 50.0 | 17.2 | 30.0 | 32.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 34.1 | 1.3 | 3.3 |
| SD | 4.1 | 6.0 | 7.2 | 4.6 | 3.0 | 8.1 | 6.4 | 5.8 | 4.9 | 5.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Skewness | 1.5 | −0.1 | −0.2 | −0.01 | 0.1 | −0.4 | −0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 2.5 | −1.4 | 2.4 | −0.3 |
| Cronbach's alpha | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Because pregnancy complications and response to pregnancy were more 2.0 positively skewed, both of them were log-transformed for correlations with other variables. *P<0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
Hierarchical multiple regression analyses predicting EPDS score during pregnancy.
|
|
| Standardised beta |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1: demographics | 0.01 | 0.01* | ||
| Age | −0.07 | −1.4 | ||
| Partner's age | 0.03 | 0.7 | ||
| Step 2: psychological response | 0.04 | 0.03*** | ||
| Response to | 0.13 | 3.1** | ||
| Desire for baby | −0.02 | 0.6 | ||
| Step 3: character | 0.33 | 0.29*** | ||
| SD | −0.41 | −8.5*** | ||
| CO | −0.01 | 0.3 | ||
| ST | 0.11 | 3.0** | ||
| Step 4: temperament | 0.37 | 0.03*** | ||
| NS | 0.08 | 1.9 | ||
| HA | 0.19 | 4.2*** | ||
| RD | −0.01 | −0.3 | ||
| PS | 0.12 | 3.2** | ||
| Standardised | 0.353 |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.