| Literature DB >> 24454917 |
Lyle R McKinnon1, Sean M Hughes2, Stephen C De Rosa3, Jeffrey A Martinson4, Jill Plants4, Kirsten E Brady4, Pamela P Gumbi5, Devin J Adams6, Lucia Vojtech2, Christine G Galloway6, Michael Fialkow2, Gretchen Lentz2, Dayong Gao7, Zhiquan Shu7, Billy Nyanga8, Preston Izulla8, Joshua Kimani8, Steve Kimwaki8, Alfred Bere5, Zoe Moodie6, Alan L Landay4, Jo-Ann S Passmore9, Rupert Kaul10, Richard M Novak11, M Juliana McElrath12, Florian Hladik13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Functional analysis of mononuclear leukocytes in the female genital mucosa is essential for understanding the immunologic effects of HIV vaccines and microbicides at the site of HIV exposure. However, the best female genital tract sampling technique is unclear. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24454917 PMCID: PMC3893217 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Comparison of immune cell yield and distribution in endocervical cytobrush (CB) and cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) samples.
(A) Representative gates for identification of CD45+ leukocytes from cytobrush and CVL samples. (B) Numbers of CD45+ leukocytes, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, CD14+ macrophages, and CD19neg/HLA-DQ+ DC enumerated from cytobrush and CVL samples. Cell numbers were log10 transformed, and plotted per site (Chicago, red dots; Nairobi, blue dots; Seattle, black dots). Horizontal bars indicate median values for each site. (C) Percentage contribution of each cell subset, as well as of cells that do not fit one of the described populations (“unknown”), to the total CD45+ population from cytobrush and CVL samples. Data are averaged across sites. P values are listed in the text, and median and IQR in Table 1.
Median (IQR) numbers of leukocyte subpopulations in endocervical cytobrushes (CB) and cervicovaginal lavages (CVL).
| Chicago | Nairobi | Seattle | ||||
| CB | CVL | CB | CVL | CB | CVL | |
| CD45+ | 12,956 (6,502–29,177) | 593 (144–2,347) | 4,869 (3,261–32,486) | 3,235 (2,449–6,386) | 1,772 (869–7,037) | 801 (76–2,809) |
| CD4 | 3,350 (1,563–8,108) | 82 (13–222) | 798 (299–4,288) | 185 (29–553) | 294 (202–1,204) | 44 (7–356) |
| CD8 | 1,689 (700–4,399) | 55 (10–153) | 840 (194–2,339) | 45 (0–101) | 322 (162–781) | 26 (0–225) |
| B | 453 (76–1,700) | 49 (20–138) | 214 (56–704) | 245 (40–1370) | 111 (43–531) | 33 (7–248) |
| MΦ | 3,641 (1,611–13,081) | 145 (25–558) | 2,434 (1,490–8,660) | 2201 (401–3,333) | 541 (76–1,579) | 187 (17–1187) |
| DC | 545 (72–1,550) | 21 (0–94) | 59 (15–429) | 13 (0–143) | 25 (3–107) | 11 (0–50) |
CD4, helper T lymphocytes; CD8, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; B, B lymphocytes; MΦ, macrophages; DC, dendritic cells.
Figure 2Comparison of immune cell yield and distribution in endocervical cytobrush (CB) and ectocervical biopsy samples.
(A) Representative gates for identification of CD45+ leukocytes from cytobrush and biopsy samples. (B) Numbers of CD45+ leukocytes, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, CD14+ macrophages, and CD19neg/HLA-DQ+ DC enumerated from cytobrush and biopsy samples. Cell numbers were log10 transformed, and plotted per site (Chicago, red dots; Nairobi, blue dots; Seattle, black dots). Horizontal bars indicate median values for each site. (C) Percentage contribution of each cell subset, as well as of cells that do not fit one of the described populations (“unknown”), to the total CD45+ population from cytobrush and biopsy samples. Data are averaged across sites. P values are listed in the text, and median and IQR in Table 2.
Median (IQR) numbers of leukocyte subpopulations in endocervical cytobrushes (CB) and ectocervical biopsies.
| Chicago | Nairobi | Seattle | ||||
| CB | Biopsy | CB | Biopsy | CB | Biopsy | |
| CD45+ | 15,893 (4,018–39,742) | 5,345 (3,467–22,357) | 12,942 (1,930–48,080) | 28,645 (5,754–73,043) | 8,396 (2,471–24,604) | 9,369 (4,935–23,644) |
| CD4 | 2,797 (515–4,407) | 2,422 (721–9,287) | 672 (161–5,496) | 5,117 (659–27,530) | 2,014 (649–4,687) | 4,341 (2,006–7,623) |
| CD8 | 1,229 (418–2,404) | 2,310 (949–9,608) | 387 (93–2,820) | 4,753 (2,050–31,614) | 1,099 (300–2,204) | 3,303 (1,835–8,327) |
| B | 485 (112–801) | 53 (24–492) | 317 (107–1,478) | 571 (196–3,738) | 261 (77–543) | 92 (39–701) |
| MΦ | 7,380 (1,193–27,016) | 98 (44–845) | 10,814 (875–23,052) | 1,683 (913–4,206) | 2,445 (616–15,326) | 392 (300–1,550) |
| DC | 405 (123–842) | 81 (35–386) | 495 (44–2,625) | 234 (77–916) | 37 (8–337) | 63 (17–111) |
CD4, helper T lymphocytes; CD8, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; B, B lymphocytes; MΦ, macrophages; DC, dendritic cells.
Figure 3Inter-site variability and sample reproducibility from female genital tract immune cell sampling techniques.
(A) Percentage contribution of each immune cell population to the total CD45+ population recovered from CVL, cytobrush, and biopsy samples collected at the Seattle, Chicago, and Nairobi study sites. (B) Numbers of CD45+ leukocytes recovered from cytobrush samples collected from all women recruited in Chicago. Filled circles and connecting lines indicate women participating in both Part 1 and Part 2 of the study (n = 12). Open circles indicate women sampled only in one part of the study. Boxes indicate median, interquartile range and total range. (C) Scatterplot of cell numbers from the twelve women sampled in both Part 1 (x axis) and Part 2 (y axis) of the study. (D) Scatterplot of cell numbers from replicate biopsies collected at the same clinic visit in seven participants at the Nairobi study site. Biopsies were taken from upper left and upper right quadrants of the ectocervix.
Figure 4Percentages of α4β7+ immune cells isolated from cytobrush (CB) and biopsy samples at the Seattle (black dots) and Chicago (red dots) study sites.
Percent α4β7 expression on CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD19+ B cells and CD19neg/HLA-DQ+ DC. Samples are only shown if more than 50 cells were acquired for the indicated population. Horizontal bars indicate median values for each site.