| Literature DB >> 24454530 |
Hongda Mao1, Megan Gribble2, Arkady M Pertsov2, Pengcheng Shi1.
Abstract
Embryonic heart morphogenesis (EHM) is a complex and dynamic process where the heart transforms from a single tube into a four-chambered pump. This process is of great biological and clinical interest but is still poorly understood for two main reasons. On the one hand, the existing imaging modalities for investigating EHM suffered from either limited penetration depth or limited spatial resolution. On the other hand, current works typically adopted manual segmentation, which was tedious, subjective, and time consuming considering the complexity of developing heart geometry and the large size of images. In this paper, we propose to utilize confocal microscopy imaging with tissue optical immersion clearing technique to image the heart at different stages of development for EHM study. The imaging method is able to produce high spatial resolution images and achieve large penetration depth at the same time. Furthermore, we propose a novel convex active contour model for automatic image segmentation. The model has the ability to deal with intensity fall-off in depth which is characterized by confocal microscopy images. We acquired the images of embryonic quail hearts from day 6 to day 14 of incubation for EHM study. The experimental results were promising and provided us with an insight view of early heart growth pattern and also paved the road for data-driven heart growth modeling.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24454530 PMCID: PMC3884962 DOI: 10.1155/2013/293069
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 13D view of embryonic quail hearts. From left to right: day 6, day 8, and day 14.
Figure 2Visual comparison between manual segmentation and automatic segmentation. (a) Original 3D image and three slices in different views. (b) Manual segmentation done by the first biologist. (c) Manual segmentation done by the second biologist. (d) Automatic segmentation.
DSC values that measure the overlap between the two manual segmentations, the first manual segmentation against automatic segmentation and the second manual segmentation against automatic segmentation.
| Day 6 | Day 7 | Day 8 | Day 9 | Day 14 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biologist 1 versus biologist 2 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.93 |
| Automatic versus biologist 1 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.88 |
| Automatic versus biologist 2 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.91 |
Figure 33D segmentation of one group of the hearts. Columns from left to right are the heart at days 6, 7, 8, 9, and 14. For visualization purpose, the outer boundary is rendered as transparent (L: left ventricle. R: right ventricle).
Average volume of the whole heart and the luminal space at different stages of development (mm3).
| Day 6 | Day 7 | Day 8 | Day 9 | Day 14 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total heart | 2.6 | 3.4 | 6.0 | 10.2 | 77.5 |
| Luminal space | 0.41 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 1.74 | 20.2 |