Literature DB >> 24454086

2-Amino-6-chloro-N-methyl-benzamide.

Yan-Hui Liang1, Xiang-Dong Mei1, Yao-Fa Li2, Wen-Liang Pan2, Jun Ning1.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C8H9ClN2O, the dihedral angle between the benzene ring and the methyl-amide substituent is 68.39 (11)°. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming layers parallel to the ab plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24454086      PMCID: PMC3884310          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813027827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background information on substituted anthranilamides, see: Bharate et al. (2013 ▶); Gnamm et al. (2012 ▶); Lahm et al. (2005 ▶); Norman et al. (1996 ▶); Roe et al. (1999 ▶). For the synthesis, see: Witt & Bergman (2000 ▶); Coppola (1980 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H9ClN2O M = 184.62 Orthorhombic, a = 9.2709 (19) Å b = 11.812 (2) Å c = 15.982 (3) Å V = 1750.2 (6) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.39 mm−1 T = 173 K 0.43 × 0.25 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

Rigaku MM007-HF CCD (Saturn 724+) diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2007 ▶) T min = 0.609, T max = 1.000 3865 measured reflections 1528 independent reflections 1351 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.042

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.065 wR(F 2) = 0.139 S = 1.17 1528 reflections 110 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.26 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.26 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, New_Global_Publ_Block. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813027827/rz5085sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813027827/rz5085Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813027827/rz5085Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H9ClN2OF(000) = 768
Mr = 184.62Dx = 1.401 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 3698 reflections
a = 9.2709 (19) Åθ = 1.3–27.5°
b = 11.812 (2) ŵ = 0.39 mm1
c = 15.982 (3) ÅT = 173 K
V = 1750.2 (6) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 80.43 × 0.25 × 0.18 mm
Rigaku MM007-HF CCD (Saturn 724+) diffractometer1528 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1351 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.042
Detector resolution: 28.5714 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.6°
ω scans at fixed χ = 45°h = −11→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2007)k = −14→9
Tmin = 0.609, Tmax = 1.000l = −10→19
3865 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.065Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.139H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.17w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0417P)2 + 1.8852P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1528 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
110 parametersΔρmax = 0.26 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.26 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.16414 (9)0.67224 (7)0.15558 (6)0.0435 (3)
O1−0.2070 (2)0.70451 (18)0.04718 (16)0.0403 (6)
C2−0.0247 (3)0.8296 (2)0.0969 (2)0.0298 (8)
N1−0.1950 (3)0.9652 (2)0.0421 (2)0.0435 (8)
H1A−0.21290.9255−0.00170.052*
H1B−0.22271.03470.04020.052*
C4−0.0826 (3)0.7415 (2)0.0382 (2)0.0302 (7)
N20.0030 (3)0.7101 (2)−0.02413 (17)0.0352 (7)
H20.08700.7405−0.02800.042*
C60.0854 (3)0.8068 (3)0.1541 (2)0.0332 (8)
C7−0.0872 (3)0.9385 (3)0.0972 (2)0.0353 (8)
C8−0.0390 (4)1.0177 (3)0.1558 (2)0.0398 (9)
H8−0.08091.09110.15680.048*
C90.1338 (4)0.8853 (3)0.2115 (2)0.0413 (9)
H90.20950.86750.24930.050*
C100.0685 (4)0.9910 (3)0.2123 (2)0.0443 (9)
H100.09821.04580.25220.053*
C11−0.0395 (4)0.6261 (3)−0.0866 (3)0.0498 (10)
H11C−0.01030.6522−0.14230.075*
H11B−0.14430.6160−0.08510.075*
H11A0.00790.5538−0.07420.075*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0438 (5)0.0390 (5)0.0476 (6)0.0069 (4)−0.0035 (4)0.0071 (4)
O10.0297 (12)0.0267 (12)0.0646 (18)−0.0043 (10)0.0029 (11)−0.0057 (12)
C20.0266 (15)0.0251 (15)0.038 (2)−0.0052 (13)0.0062 (14)0.0020 (14)
N10.0440 (16)0.0248 (14)0.062 (2)0.0047 (13)−0.0059 (15)−0.0056 (14)
C40.0281 (15)0.0200 (14)0.042 (2)0.0012 (13)−0.0025 (15)0.0036 (14)
N20.0309 (13)0.0341 (14)0.0405 (17)−0.0032 (12)0.0040 (13)−0.0069 (13)
C60.0306 (16)0.0300 (17)0.039 (2)−0.0008 (14)0.0073 (15)0.0012 (15)
C70.0326 (16)0.0270 (16)0.046 (2)−0.0029 (14)0.0076 (16)−0.0019 (15)
C80.048 (2)0.0262 (17)0.046 (2)−0.0076 (16)0.0130 (18)−0.0030 (16)
C90.0365 (18)0.051 (2)0.036 (2)−0.0082 (18)0.0047 (16)−0.0041 (18)
C100.0447 (19)0.045 (2)0.043 (2)−0.0132 (18)0.0148 (18)−0.0141 (18)
C110.042 (2)0.052 (2)0.056 (3)0.0000 (18)−0.0020 (19)−0.021 (2)
Cl1—C61.749 (3)C6—C91.379 (5)
O1—C41.242 (3)C7—C81.397 (5)
C2—C61.395 (4)C8—C101.381 (5)
C2—C71.411 (4)C8—H80.9500
C2—C41.501 (4)C9—C101.388 (5)
N1—C71.369 (4)C9—H90.9500
N1—H1A0.8601C10—H100.9500
N1—H1B0.8600C11—H11C0.9800
C4—N21.326 (4)C11—H11B0.9800
N2—C111.461 (4)C11—H11A0.9800
N2—H20.8600
C6—C2—C7118.4 (3)C8—C7—C2118.7 (3)
C6—C2—C4122.5 (3)C10—C8—C7121.1 (3)
C7—C2—C4119.1 (3)C10—C8—H8119.4
C7—N1—H1A122.6C7—C8—H8119.4
C7—N1—H1B117.4C6—C9—C10118.0 (3)
H1A—N1—H1B115.8C6—C9—H9121.0
O1—C4—N2123.0 (3)C10—C9—H9121.0
O1—C4—C2120.2 (3)C8—C10—C9120.9 (3)
N2—C4—C2116.7 (3)C8—C10—H10119.5
C4—N2—C11122.8 (3)C9—C10—H10119.5
C4—N2—H2118.6N2—C11—H11C109.5
C11—N2—H2118.6N2—C11—H11B109.5
C9—C6—C2122.9 (3)H11C—C11—H11B109.5
C9—C6—Cl1117.7 (3)N2—C11—H11A109.5
C2—C6—Cl1119.3 (2)H11C—C11—H11A109.5
N1—C7—C8120.7 (3)H11B—C11—H11A109.5
N1—C7—C2120.6 (3)
C6—C2—C4—O1111.3 (4)C6—C2—C7—N1179.7 (3)
C7—C2—C4—O1−66.0 (4)C4—C2—C7—N1−2.8 (5)
C6—C2—C4—N2−71.3 (4)C6—C2—C7—C8−1.6 (5)
C7—C2—C4—N2111.3 (3)C4—C2—C7—C8175.9 (3)
O1—C4—N2—C11−2.1 (5)N1—C7—C8—C10179.2 (3)
C2—C4—N2—C11−179.4 (3)C2—C7—C8—C100.5 (5)
C7—C2—C6—C91.1 (5)C2—C6—C9—C100.5 (5)
C4—C2—C6—C9−176.3 (3)Cl1—C6—C9—C10−178.0 (3)
C7—C2—C6—Cl1179.6 (2)C7—C8—C10—C91.2 (5)
C4—C2—C6—Cl12.2 (4)C6—C9—C10—C8−1.7 (5)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1B···O1i0.862.112.970 (3)175
N2—H2···O1ii0.862.042.895 (4)172
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1B⋯O1i 0.862.112.970 (3)175
N2—H2⋯O1ii 0.862.042.895 (4)172

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  5 in total

1.  Reversal of P-glycoprotein mediated multidrug resistance by novel anthranilamide derivatives.

Authors:  M Roe; A Folkes; P Ashworth; J Brumwell; L Chima; S Hunjan; I Pretswell; W Dangerfield; H Ryder; P Charlton
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  1999-02-22       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Insecticidal anthranilic diamides: a new class of potent ryanodine receptor activators.

Authors:  George P Lahm; Thomas P Selby; John H Freudenberger; Thomas M Stevenson; Brian J Myers; Gilles Seburyamo; Ben K Smith; Lindsey Flexner; Christopher E Clark; Daniel Cordova
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Novel diamide insecticides: sulfoximines, sulfonimidamides and other new sulfonimidoyl derivatives.

Authors:  Christian Gnamm; André Jeanguenat; Ana C Dutton; Christoph Grimm; Daniel P Kloer; Andrew J Crossthwaite
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Structure-activity relationships of a series of substituted benzamides: potent D2/5-HT2 antagonists and 5-HT1a agonists as neuroleptic agents.

Authors:  M H Norman; G C Rigdon; W R Hall; F Navas
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 7.446

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.