Literature DB >> 24454032

Di-μ-hydroxido-κ(4) O:O-di-μ-perchlorato-κ(4) O:O'-bis-[(2,2'-bi-pyridine-κ(2) N,N')copper(II)].

B Saravanan1, A Jayamani2, N Sengottuvelan2, G Chakkaravarthi3, V Manivannan1.   

Abstract

In the title binuclear copper(II) complex, [Cu2(ClO4)2(OH)2(C10H8N2)2], the Cu(II) ion is coordinated in the form of a Jahn-Teller distorted octahedron by two bi-pyridine N atoms, two perchlorate O atoms and two hydroxide O atoms, and displays a distorted octa-hedral geometry. The mol-ecule belongs to the symmetry point group C 2h . The Cu(II) ion is located on a twofold rotation axis and the hydroxide and perchlorate ligands are located on a mirror plane. Within the dinuclear mol-ecule, the Cu⋯Cu separation is 2.8614 (7) Å. The crystal structure exhibits O-H⋯O, C-H⋯O and π-π [centroid-centroid distance = 3.5374 (13) Å] inter-actions.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24454032      PMCID: PMC3884256          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813027852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the biological activity of copper complexes, see: Müller et al. (2003 ▶); Lo et al. (2000 ▶). For related strucutures, see: Li et al. (2009 ▶); Shaikh et al. (2012 ▶); Wang et al. (2010 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Cu2(ClO4)2(OH)2(C10H8N2)2] M = 672.36 Monoclinic, a = 13.6014 (12) Å b = 15.2064 (13) Å c = 6.2738 (6) Å β = 113.587 (3)° V = 1189.19 (19) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 2.08 mm−1 T = 295 K 0.24 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

Bruker Kappa APEXII diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.635, T max = 0.706 4520 measured reflections 1516 independent reflections 1330 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.022

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.026 wR(F 2) = 0.077 S = 1.03 1516 reflections 95 parameters 1 restraint H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.44 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813027852/bt6938sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813027852/bt6938Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Cu2(ClO4)2(OH)2(C10H8N2)2]F(000) = 676
Mr = 672.36Dx = 1.878 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yCell parameters from 4012 reflections
a = 13.6014 (12) Åθ = 3.2–28.3°
b = 15.2064 (13) ŵ = 2.08 mm1
c = 6.2738 (6) ÅT = 295 K
β = 113.587 (3)°Block, colourless
V = 1189.19 (19) Å30.24 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm
Z = 2
Bruker Kappa APEXII diffractometer1516 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1330 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.022
ω and φ scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 3.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −17→17
Tmin = 0.635, Tmax = 0.706k = −20→18
4520 measured reflectionsl = −8→8
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.026Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.077H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.03w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0419P)2 + 0.8702P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1516 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
95 parametersΔρmax = 0.44 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = −0.31 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C1−0.96779 (13)−0.27374 (12)−0.3726 (3)0.0316 (4)
C2−0.93192 (16)−0.34870 (14)−0.2418 (3)0.0415 (4)
H2−0.9468−0.4039−0.31150.050*
C3−0.87311 (17)−0.34058 (17)−0.0041 (4)0.0481 (5)
H3−0.8474−0.39030.08770.058*
C4−0.85328 (16)−0.25859 (17)0.0941 (4)0.0469 (5)
H4−0.8151−0.25200.25360.056*
C5−0.89063 (16)−0.18601 (16)−0.0462 (3)0.0429 (5)
H5−0.8767−0.13030.02070.052*
N1−0.94650 (12)−0.19315 (11)−0.2767 (2)0.0331 (3)
O1−0.95484 (16)0.0000−0.2803 (3)0.0416 (5)
O2−0.75740 (19)0.0000−0.7997 (4)0.0547 (6)
O3−0.79963 (14)−0.07747 (11)−0.5234 (3)0.0566 (4)
O4−0.63781 (17)0.0000−0.4095 (4)0.0584 (6)
Cl1−0.74892 (5)0.0000−0.56343 (11)0.03846 (17)
Cu1−1.0000−0.09408 (2)−0.50000.03551 (13)
H1−0.8987 (16)0.0000−0.167 (4)0.053*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0339 (8)0.0310 (9)0.0312 (9)−0.0004 (7)0.0143 (7)0.0011 (7)
C20.0480 (11)0.0352 (10)0.0402 (10)0.0028 (8)0.0163 (9)0.0054 (8)
C30.0491 (11)0.0519 (14)0.0398 (11)0.0063 (10)0.0139 (9)0.0167 (10)
C40.0411 (10)0.0649 (15)0.0299 (9)−0.0013 (10)0.0093 (8)0.0043 (10)
C50.0442 (10)0.0481 (12)0.0330 (9)−0.0068 (9)0.0118 (8)−0.0047 (9)
N10.0373 (7)0.0311 (8)0.0297 (7)−0.0038 (6)0.0122 (6)−0.0013 (6)
O10.0478 (11)0.0305 (10)0.0335 (10)0.0000.0027 (8)0.000
O20.0678 (14)0.0552 (14)0.0335 (11)0.0000.0123 (10)0.000
O30.0610 (10)0.0435 (9)0.0628 (11)−0.0040 (7)0.0223 (8)0.0070 (8)
O40.0420 (11)0.0687 (16)0.0470 (13)0.000−0.0004 (10)0.000
Cl10.0394 (3)0.0367 (3)0.0315 (3)0.0000.0061 (3)0.000
Cu10.0431 (2)0.02606 (18)0.0349 (2)0.0000.01302 (14)0.000
C1—N11.345 (2)N1—Cu11.9865 (16)
C1—C21.375 (3)O1—Cu11.9097 (13)
C1—C1i1.484 (3)O1—Cu1ii1.9097 (13)
C2—C31.388 (3)O1—H10.807 (10)
C2—H20.9300O2—Cl11.440 (2)
C3—C41.369 (4)O3—Cl11.4372 (17)
C3—H30.9300O4—Cl11.431 (2)
C4—C51.376 (3)Cl1—O3iii1.4372 (17)
C4—H40.9300Cu1—O1ii1.9097 (13)
C5—N11.342 (2)Cu1—N1i1.9865 (16)
C5—H50.9300Cu1—Cu1ii2.8614 (7)
N1—C1—C2121.81 (16)Cu1—O1—H1123.4 (12)
N1—C1—C1i114.25 (10)Cu1ii—O1—H1123.4 (12)
C2—C1—C1i123.94 (11)O4—Cl1—O3109.45 (9)
C1—C2—C3118.8 (2)O4—Cl1—O3iii109.45 (9)
C1—C2—H2120.6O3—Cl1—O3iii110.11 (15)
C3—C2—H2120.6O4—Cl1—O2108.83 (15)
C4—C3—C2119.3 (2)O3—Cl1—O2109.49 (9)
C4—C3—H3120.3O3iii—Cl1—O2109.49 (9)
C2—C3—H3120.3O1—Cu1—O1ii82.97 (9)
C3—C4—C5119.13 (19)O1—Cu1—N1i176.89 (8)
C3—C4—H4120.4O1ii—Cu1—N1i97.91 (6)
C5—C4—H4120.4O1—Cu1—N197.91 (6)
N1—C5—C4122.0 (2)O1ii—Cu1—N1176.89 (7)
N1—C5—H5119.0N1i—Cu1—N181.37 (9)
C4—C5—H5119.0O1—Cu1—Cu1ii41.48 (4)
C5—N1—C1118.93 (17)O1ii—Cu1—Cu1ii41.48 (4)
C5—N1—Cu1126.04 (15)N1i—Cu1—Cu1ii139.32 (4)
C1—N1—Cu1115.01 (11)N1—Cu1—Cu1ii139.32 (4)
Cu1—O1—Cu1ii97.03 (9)
N1—C1—C2—C30.7 (3)C1i—C1—N1—Cu1−2.8 (2)
C1i—C1—C2—C3−179.4 (2)Cu1ii—O1—Cu1—O1ii0.0
C1—C2—C3—C40.6 (3)Cu1ii—O1—Cu1—N1176.99 (7)
C2—C3—C4—C5−1.1 (3)C5—N1—Cu1—O1−3.53 (17)
C3—C4—C5—N10.4 (3)C1—N1—Cu1—O1178.01 (13)
C4—C5—N1—C10.9 (3)C5—N1—Cu1—N1i179.53 (19)
C4—C5—N1—Cu1−177.48 (15)C1—N1—Cu1—N1i1.07 (9)
C2—C1—N1—C5−1.4 (3)C5—N1—Cu1—Cu1ii−0.47 (19)
C1i—C1—N1—C5178.60 (18)C1—N1—Cu1—Cu1ii−178.93 (9)
C2—C1—N1—Cu1177.14 (14)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O2iv0.81 (2)2.34 (1)3.134 (3)169 (4)
C5—H5···O2iv0.932.523.381 (3)153
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O2i 0.81 (2)2.34 (1)3.134 (3)169 (4)
C5—H5⋯O2i 0.932.523.381 (3)153

Symmetry code: (i) .

  6 in total

1.  Trapping cations in specific positions in tuneable "artificial cell" channels: new nanochemistry perspectives.

Authors:  Achim Müller; Samar K Das; Sergei Talismanov; Soumyajit Roy; Eike Beckmann; Hartmut Bögge; Marc Schmidtmann; Alice Merca; Alois Berkle; Lionel Allouche; Yunshan Zhou; Lijuan Zhang
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2003-10-27       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Bis(2,2'-bipyridine)(2-hy-droxy-2,2-diphenyl-acetato)-copper(II) nitrate dihydrate.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Wang; Chun Zheng; Shao-Wei Mai; Xuan Xu; Yi-Fan Luo
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-09-11

4.  Tetra-μ(2)-acetato-κO:O'-bis-[(isoquinoline-κN)copper(II)].

Authors:  Meng-Jiao Li; Jing-Jing Nie; Duan-Jun Xu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-07-08

5.  Bis[2-(2-hy-droxy-meth-yl)pyridine-κ(2)N,O](pivalato-κO)copper(II).

Authors:  M Mobin Shaikh; Veenu Mishra; Priti Ram; Anil Birla
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-07-14

6.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.