Literature DB >> 24453318

Reward-related activity in ventral striatum is action contingent and modulated by behavioral relevance.

Thomas H B FitzGerald1, Philipp Schwartenbeck, Raymond J Dolan.   

Abstract

Multiple features of the environment are often imbued with motivational significance, and the relative importance of these can change across contexts. The ability to flexibly adjust evaluative processes so that currently important features of the environment alone drive behavior is critical to adaptive routines. We know relatively little about the neural mechanisms involved, including whether motivationally significant features are obligatorily evaluated or whether current relevance gates access to value-sensitive regions. We addressed these questions using functional magnetic resonance imaging data and a task design where human subjects had to choose whether to accept or reject an offer indicated by visual and auditory stimuli. By manipulating, on a trial-by-trial basis, which stimulus determined the value of the offer, we show choice activity in the ventral striatum solely reflects the value of the currently relevant stimulus, consistent with a model wherein behavioral relevance modulates the impact of sensory stimuli on value processing. Choice outcome signals in this same region covaried positively with wins on accept trials, and negatively with wins on reject trials, consistent with striatal activity at feedback reflecting correctness of response rather than reward processing per se. We conclude that ventral striatum activity during decision making is dynamically modulated by behavioral context, indexed here by task relevance and action selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action value; multisensory; policy selection; reward; ventral striatum

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24453318      PMCID: PMC3898287          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4389-13.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  52 in total

1.  Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  B Knutson; C M Adams; G W Fong; D Hommer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neuronal activity in monkey ventral striatum related to the expectation of reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Apicella; E Scarnati; T Ljungberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Sean M Polyn; Greg J Detre; James V Haxby
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making.

Authors:  Antonio Rangel; Colin Camerer; P Read Montague
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Informatic parcellation of the network involved in the computation of subjective value.

Authors:  John A Clithero; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  The decision value computations in the vmPFC and striatum use a relative value code that is guided by visual attention.

Authors:  Seung-Lark Lim; John P O'Doherty; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning.

Authors:  John O'Doherty; Peter Dayan; Johannes Schultz; Ralf Deichmann; Karl Friston; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The valuation system: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value.

Authors:  Oscar Bartra; Joseph T McGuire; Joseph W Kable
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Reinforcement learning or active inference?

Authors:  Karl J Friston; Jean Daunizeau; Stefan J Kiebel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reward facilitates tactile judgments and modulates hemodynamic responses in human primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Burkhard Pleger; Felix Blankenburg; Christian C Ruff; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  13 in total

1.  Striatal action-value neurons reconsidered.

Authors:  Lotem Elber-Dorozko; Yonatan Loewenstein
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  No Effect of Commercial Cognitive Training on Brain Activity, Choice Behavior, or Cognitive Performance.

Authors:  Joseph W Kable; M Kathleen Caulfield; Mary Falcone; Mairead McConnell; Leah Bernardo; Trishala Parthasarathi; Nicole Cooper; Rebecca Ashare; Janet Audrain-McGovern; Robert Hornik; Paul Diefenbach; Frank J Lee; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  No unified reward prediction error in local field potentials from the human nucleus accumbens: evidence from epilepsy patients.

Authors:  Max-Philipp Stenner; Robb B Rutledge; Tino Zaehle; Friedhelm C Schmitt; Klaus Kopitzki; Alexander B Kowski; Jürgen Voges; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Evidence for a Large-Scale Brain System Supporting Allostasis and Interoception in Humans.

Authors:  Ian R Kleckner; Jiahe Zhang; Alexandra Touroutoglou; Lorena Chanes; Chenjie Xia; W Kyle Simmons; Karen S Quigley; Bradford C Dickerson; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-04-24

5.  Persistent coding of outcome-predictive cue features in the rat nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Jimmie M Gmaz; James E Carmichael; Matthijs Aa van der Meer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Modeling subjective relevance in schizophrenia and its relation to aberrant salience.

Authors:  Teresa Katthagen; Christoph Mathys; Lorenz Deserno; Henrik Walter; Norbert Kathmann; Andreas Heinz; Florian Schlagenhauf
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Success and failure of controlling the real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback signal are reflected in the striatum.

Authors:  Leon Skottnik; Bettina Sorger; Tabea Kamp; David Linden; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  Dopaminergic basis for signaling belief updates, but not surprise, and the link to paranoia.

Authors:  Matthew M Nour; Tarik Dahoun; Philipp Schwartenbeck; Rick A Adams; Thomas H B FitzGerald; Christopher Coello; Matthew B Wall; Raymond J Dolan; Oliver D Howes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Neural signals encoding shifts in beliefs.

Authors:  Philipp Schwartenbeck; Thomas H B FitzGerald; Ray Dolan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The influence of contextual reward statistics on risk preference.

Authors:  Francesco Rigoli; Robb B Rutledge; Peter Dayan; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.