Literature DB >> 24453176

Common and dissociated mechanisms for estimating large and small dot arrays: value-specific fMRI adaptation.

Nele Demeyere1, Pia Rotshtein, Glyn W Humphreys.   

Abstract

An fMRI pair-adaptation paradigm was used to identify the brain regions linked to the apprehension of small and large numbers of items. Participants classified stimuli on the basis of their numerosities (fewer or more than five dots). We manipulated the type of repetition within pairs of dot arrays. Overall processing of pairs with small as opposed to large quantities was associated with a decreased BOLD response in the midline structures and inferior parietal cortex. The opposite pattern was observed in middle cingulate cortex. Pairs in which the same numerosity category was repeated, were associated with a decreased signal in the left prefrontal and the left inferior parietal cortices, compared with when numerosities changed. Repetitions of exact numerosities irrespective of sample size were associated with decreased responses in bi-lateral prefrontal, sensory-motor regions, posterior occipital and left intraparietal sulcus (IPS). More importantly, we found value-specific adaptation specific to repeated small quantity in the left lateral occipito-temporal cortex, irrespective of whether the exact same stimulus pattern repeated. Our results indicate that a large network of regions (including the IPS) support visual quantity processing independent of the number of items present; however assimilation of small quantities is associated with additional support from regions within the left occipito-temporal cortex. We propose that processing of small quantities is aided by a subitizing-specific network. This network may account for the increased processing efficiency often reported for numerosities in the subitizing range.
Copyright © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; functional magnetic resonance imaging; mental processes; neuroimaging; numerical cognition; perception

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24453176      PMCID: PMC6869284          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  46 in total

1.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons.

Authors:  K Grill-Spector; R Malach
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2001-04

2.  Notation-dependent and -independent representations of numbers in the parietal lobes.

Authors:  Roi Cohen Kadosh; Kathrin Cohen Kadosh; Amanda Kaas; Avishai Henik; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Is subitizing a unique numerical ability?

Authors:  J D Balakrishnan; F G Ashby
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-12

4.  Immediate small number perception: evidence from a new numerical carry-over procedure.

Authors:  Nele Demeyere; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes.

Authors:  G Mandler; B J Shebo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1982-03

6.  Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation?

Authors:  Susannah K Revkin; Manuela Piazza; Véronique Izard; Laurent Cohen; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-06

7.  Neural evidence linking visual object enumeration and attention.

Authors:  K Sathian; T J Simon; S Peterson; G A Patel; J M Hoffman; S T Grafton
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The processing of visual shape in the cerebral cortex of human and nonhuman primates: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Katrien Denys; Wim Vanduffel; Denis Fize; Koen Nelissen; Hendrik Peuskens; David Van Essen; Guy A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  All numbers are not equal: an electrophysiological investigation of small and large number representations.

Authors:  Daniel C Hyde; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-old children.

Authors:  Jessica F Cantlon; Elizabeth M Brannon; Elizabeth J Carter; Kevin A Pelphrey
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  5 in total

1.  Topology-defined units in numerosity perception.

Authors:  Lixia He; Ke Zhou; Tiangang Zhou; Sheng He; Lin Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neural Tuning to Numerosity Relates to Perceptual Tuning in 3-6-Year-Old Children.

Authors:  Alyssa J Kersey; Jessica F Cantlon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spatial Arrangement and Set Size Influence the Coding of Non-symbolic Quantities in the Intraparietal Sulcus.

Authors:  Johannes Bloechle; Julia F Huber; Elise Klein; Julia Bahnmueller; Johannes Rennig; Korbinian Moeller; Stefan Huber
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Effects of adaptation on numerosity decoding in the human brain.

Authors:  E Castaldi; D Aagten-Murphy; M Tosetti; D Burr; M C Morrone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Numerosities and Other Magnitudes in the Brains: A Comparative View.

Authors:  Elena Lorenzi; Matilde Perrino; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.