| Literature DB >> 24452736 |
Takeshi Fujishiro1, Kiyohiko Shuto2, Koichi Hayano1, Asami Satoh1, Tsuguaki Kono1, Gaku Ohira1, Takayuki Tohma1, Hisashi Gunji1, Kazuo Narushima1, Toru Tochigi1, Toshiharu Hanaoka1, Sayaka Ishii1, Noriyuki Yanagawa3, Hisahiro Matsubara1.
Abstract
Reports suggest that hepatic blood flow may have an association with cancer progression. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the hepatic blood flow measured by CT perfusion (CTP) may identify patients at high‑risk for postoperative recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Prior to surgery, hepatic CTP images were obtained using a 320-row area detector CT. The data were analyzed by a commercially available software based on the dual input maximum slope method, and arterial blood flow (AF, ml/min/100 ml tissue), portal blood flow (PF, ml/min/100 ml tissue) and perfusion index [PI (%) = AF/AF + PF x 100] were measured. These parameters were compared with the pathological stage and outcome of the ESCC patients. Forty-five patients with ESCC were eligible for this study. The median follow-up period was 17 months, and recurrences were observed in 9 patients (20%). The preoperative PI values of the 9 patients with recurrence were significantly higher than those of the 36 patients without recurrence (23.9 vs. 15.9, P=0.0022). Patients were categorized into the following two groups; high PI (>20) and low PI (<20). The recurrence-free survival of the low PI group was significantly better than that of the high PI group (P<0.0001). A multivariate analysis showed that a high PI was an independent risk factor for recurrence (odds ratio, 19.1; P=0.0369).Therefore, the preoperative PI of the liver may be a useful imaging biomarker for predicting the recurrence of patients with esophageal cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24452736 PMCID: PMC3926648 DOI: 10.3892/or.2014.2992
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Rep ISSN: 1021-335X Impact factor: 3.906
Figure 1Imaging analysis of hepatic CT perfusion. In order to obtain perfusion parameters, it was necessary to set the region of interest (ROI) in (A) four sites. (B) The time density curve and (C) parameters were calculated and displayed as a functional color map using a software program. A round or oval-shaped ROI was placed on the right hepatic lobe on the functional map, so that the ROI would be as large as possible while avoiding vessels and artifacts.
Preoperative hepatic perfusion parameters and clinicopathological features of the patients with ESCC.
| Variables | AF | PF | PI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor location | |||
| Upper | 28.5 | 128.4 | 18.5 |
| Lower | 25.7 | 127.1 | 16.9 |
| P (or yp) stage | |||
| 0/1 | 25.8 | 128.3 | 17.0 |
| 2/3/4 | 27.7 | 127.1 | 18.0 |
| P (or yp) T | |||
| 0/1 | 26.0 | 130.8 | 16.8 |
| 2/3 | 27.6 | 127.7 | 18.2 |
| P (or yp) N | |||
| N0 | 26.4 | 129.1 | 17.1 |
| N1/2/3 | 27.5 | 128.4 | 18.1 |
| Differentiation | |||
| Well/moderate | 24.9 | 128.0 | 16.4 |
| Poor | 34.1 | 119.0 | 22.7 |
P<0.05 (Mann-Whitney U test). AF and PF are expressed in ml/min/100 ml tissue. AF, arterial blood flow; PF, portal blood flow; PI, perfusion index (%).
Relationships between pathological stage and the preoperative perfusion parameters of the ESCC patients.
| P stage (UICC) | AF | PF | PI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (n=1) | 16.8 | 127.3 | 11.7 |
| IA/B (n=18/2) | 26.2 | 128.3 | 17.2 |
| IIA/B (n=6/5) | 27.9 | 133.1 | 17.6 |
| IIIA/B/C (n=7/2/3) | 25.8 | 124.9 | 17.3 |
| IV (n=1) | 53.8 | 119 | 31.1 |
| P-value | N.S | N.S | N.S |
Kruskal-Wallis test. AF and PF are expressed in ml/min/100 ml tissue. UICC, Union for International Cancer Control. AF, arterial blood flow; PF, portal blood flow; PI, perfusion index (%).
Figure 2Determination of the cut-off value. We determined the optimal cut-off value for high-risk of recurrence according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. AF, arterial blood flow; PF, portal blood flow; PI, perfusion index; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.
Background of the high-risk and low-risk recurrence groups according to the preoperative PI values.
| Variable | Categories | High PI (n=12) | Low PI (n=33) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age (years) | - | 69.3 | 66.4 |
| P (or yp) stage | 0/I/II/III/IV | 0/3/4/4/1 | 1/17/7/8/0 |
| P (or yp) T | 0/1/2/3/4 | 0/3/2/7/0 | 1/18/5/9/0 |
| P (or yp) N | 0/1/2/3 | 6/2/1/3 | 21/8/4/0 |
| Preoperative therapy, n (%) | - | 6 (50%) | 13 (39.4%) |
| Complication | Non, I, II/III-V | 10/2 | 26/7 |
| Grade | 0/1/2/3 | 0/5/1/0 | 2/7/3/1 |
| Recurrence rate, n (%) | - | 7 (58.3%) | 2 (6.1%) |
P<0.01 (Chi-square test).
All complications were included that occurred in the perioperative period regardless of the direct effect of the surgical procedure.
Figure 3Recurrence-free survival (RFS) curves. (A) An actuarial analysis of the RFS using the Kaplan-Meier method showed that the recurrence rate was significantly higher in the high PI group (PI >20) than that in the low PI group (PI <20) (P<0.0001, log-rank test). (B) In order to prevent the influence of a staging bias, a subgroup analysis was performed. The patients with stage 0/I/II and stage III/IV disease exhibited a similar tendency (P=0.0005, log-rank test).
Univariate and multivariate analyses of the prognostic parameters for time to recurrence after surgery in the esophageal cancer patients.
| Univariate | Multivariate | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| Variable | Categories | Odds ratio | 95% CI | P-value | Odds ratio | 95% CI | P-value |
| PI | ≥20 vs. <20 | 21.7 | 3.5–135.8 | 0.0010 | 19.1 | 1.2–303.7 | 0.0369 |
| P (or yp) T | 2/3/4 vs. 0/1 | 11.2 | 1.3–99.3 | 0.0300 | 14.2 | 0.323–621.7 | 0.1693 |
| P (or yp) N | + vs. − | 4 | 0.8–18.8 | 0.0795 | 1.0 | 0.023–48.2 | 0.9806 |
| P (or yp) stage | III/IV vs. 0/I/II | 4.4 | 0.9–20.2 | 0.0589 | 2.5 | 0.066–91.5 | 0.6253 |
| Differentiation | Poor vs. mod/well | 4.5 | 0.9–22.7 | 0.0701 | 5.5 | 0.316–94.6 | 0.2431 |
| Location | Upper vs. lower | 1.3 | 0.3–5.5 | 0.7612 | 2.8 | 0.236–33.4 | 0.4145 |
| Age (years) | ≥65 vs. <64 | 1.4 | 0.3–6.6 | 0.6491 | 0.381 | 0.013–11.0 | 0.5740 |
CI, confidence interval; PI, perfusion index.