Literature DB >> 23748229

Computed tomographic perfusion imaging for the prediction of response and survival to transarterial radioembolization of liver metastases.

Fabian Morsbach1, Thomas Pfammatter, Caecilia S Reiner, Michael A Fischer, Bert-Ram Sah, Sebastian Winklhofer, Ernst Klotz, Thomas Frauenfelder, Alexander Knuth, Burkhardt Seifert, Niklaus Schaefer, Hatem Alkadhi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively, in patients with liver metastases, the ability of computed tomographic (CT) perfusion to predict the morphologic response and survival after transarterial radioembolization (TARE).
METHODS: Thirty-eight patients (22 men; mean [SD] age, 63 [12] years) with otherwise therapy-refractory liver metastases underwent dynamic, contrast-enhanced CT perfusion within 1 hour before treatment planning catheter angiography, for calculation of the arterial perfusion (AP) of liver metastases, 20 days before TARE with Yttrium-90 microspheres. Treatment response was evaluated morphologically on follow-up imaging (mean, 114 days) on the basis of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria (version 1.1). Pretreatment CT perfusion was compared between responders and nonresponders. One-year survival was calculated including all 38 patients using the Kaplan-Meier curves; the Cox proportional hazard model was used for calculating predictors of survival.
RESULTS: Follow-up imaging was not available in 11 patients because of rapidly deteriorating health or death. From the remaining 27, a total of 9 patients (33%) were classified as responders and 18 patients (67%) were classified as nonresponders. A significant difference in AP was found on pretreatment CT perfusion between the responders and the nonresponders to the TARE (P < 0.001). Change in tumor size on the follow-up imaging correlated significantly and negatively with AP before the TARE (r = -0.60; P = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristics analysis of AP in relation to treatment response revealed an area under the curve of 0.969 (95% confidence interval, 0.911-1.000; P < 0.001). A cutoff AP of 16 mL per 100 mL/min was associated with a sensitivity of 100% (9/9) (95% CI, 70%-100%) and a specificity of 89% (16/18) (95% CI, 62%-96%) for predicting therapy response. A significantly higher 1-year survival after the TARE was found in the patients with a pretreatment AP of 16 mL per 100 mL/min or greater (P = 0.028), being a significant, independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio, 0.101; P = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: Arterial perfusion of liver metastases, as determined by pretreatment CT perfusion imaging, enables prediction of short-term morphologic response and 1-year survival to TARE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23748229     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31829810f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  17 in total

1.  Renal versus splenic maximum slope based perfusion CT modelling in patients with portal-hypertension.

Authors:  Michael A Fischer; Katharina Brehmer; Anders Svensson; Peter Aspelin; Torkel B Brismar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Integrated ¹⁸F-FDG PET/perfusion CT for the monitoring of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal carcinoma: correlation with histopathology.

Authors:  Michael A Fischer; Bart Vrugt; Hatem Alkadhi; Dieter Hahnloser; Thomas F Hany; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  [CT and MRI of the liver: when, what, why?]

Authors:  J Budjan; S O Schoenberg; U I Attenberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Quantitative Measurements of Enhancement on Preprocedure Triphasic CT Can Predict Response of Colorectal Liver Metastases to Radioembolization.

Authors:  F Edward Boas; Lynn A Brody; Joseph P Erinjeri; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Waleed Shady; Sirish Kishore; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Hepatic imaging response to radioembolization with yttrium-90-labeled resin microspheres for tumor progression during systemic chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Andrew S Kennedy; David S Ball; Steven J Cohen; Michael Cohn; Douglas M Coldwell; Alain Drooz; Eduardo Ehrenwald; Samir Kanani; Charles W Nutting; Fred M Moeslein; Samuel G Putnam; Steven C Rose; Michael A Savin; Sabine Schirm; Navesh K Sharma; Eric A Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12

6.  Can quantitative iodine parameters on DECT replace perfusion CT parameters in colorectal cancers?

Authors:  Hyo-Jin Kang; Se Hyung Kim; Jae Seok Bae; Sun Kyung Jeon; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Optimizing the Combination of Immunotherapy and Trans-Arterial Locoregional Therapy for Stages B and C Hepatocellular Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Woeste; Anne E Geller; Robert C G Martin; Hiram C Polk
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Perfusion CT best predicts outcome after radioembolization of liver metastases: a comparison of radionuclide and CT imaging techniques.

Authors:  Fabian Morsbach; Bert-Ram Sah; Lea Spring; Gilbert Puippe; Sonja Gordic; Burkhardt Seifert; Niklaus Schaefer; Thomas Pfammatter; Hatem Alkadhi; Caecilia S Reiner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  CT Perfusion Imaging Can Predict Patients' Survival and Early Response to Transarterial Chemo-Lipiodol Infusion for Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancers.

Authors:  Wei-Fu Lv; Jian-Kui Han; De-Lei Cheng; Chun-Ze Zhou; Ming Ni; Dong Lu
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Preoperative hepatic CT perfusion as an early predictor for the recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Takeshi Fujishiro; Kiyohiko Shuto; Koichi Hayano; Asami Satoh; Tsuguaki Kono; Gaku Ohira; Takayuki Tohma; Hisashi Gunji; Kazuo Narushima; Toru Tochigi; Toshiharu Hanaoka; Sayaka Ishii; Noriyuki Yanagawa; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.906

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.