Literature DB >> 24451857

Peri-implant bone loss around single and multiple prostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Camila Tannure Firme, Mario Vianna Vettore, Marcela Melo, Guaracilei Maciel Vidigal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess and compare the marginal bone loss around implants supporting single fixed prostheses and multiple-unit screw-retained prostheses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature was searched manually and electronically to identify studies in which the marginal peri-implant bone loss around single-implant prostheses and screw-retained multiple-implant prostheses was evaluated radiographically. Two reviewers independently selected the literature and extracted the data. The random-effects method was used to obtain estimates of marginal peri-implant bone loss (means and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]).
RESULTS: Of the 2,107 studies identified by a preliminary search, 17 fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 7 were related to single-implant prostheses and 10 to multiple-implant screw-retained fixed prostheses. The mean marginal peri-implant bone loss was 0.9 mm (95% CI, 0.49 to 1.32 mm) for multiple-implant screw-retained prostheses and 0.58 mm (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.80 mm) for single-implant prostheses.
CONCLUSION: This indirect comparison provided no evidence to support the assertion that there are differences in marginal peri-implant bone loss between single implant prostheses and multiple screw-retained prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24451857     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  6 in total

Review 1.  Peri-implantitis. Part 1: Scope of the problem.

Authors:  A Alani; M Kelleher; K Bishop
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Biomechanical Consequences of the Elastic Properties of Dental Implant Alloys on the Supporting Bone: Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Esteban Pérez-Pevida; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; David Chávarri-Prado; Antonio Jiménez-Garrudo; Fernando Sánchez-Lasheras; Eneko Solaberrieta-Méndez; Markel Diéguez-Pereira; Felipe J Fernández-González; Borja Dehesa-Ibarra; Francesca Monticelli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: a systematic review for fixed and removable restorations.

Authors:  Jennifer Zimmermann; Melanie Sommer; Leticia Grize; Stefan Stubinger
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2019-07-16

4.  Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Odontuya Dorj; Chin-Kai Lin; Eisner Salamanca; Yu-Hwa Pan; Yi-Fan Wu; Yung-Szu Hsu; Jerry C-Y Lin; Hsi-Kuei Lin; Wei-Jen Chang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Peri-Implant Behavior of Tissue Level Dental Implants with a Convergent Neck.

Authors:  Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Irene Bermúdez-Mulet; Lucía Fernández-Estevan; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Rocío Marco-Pitarch; Marina García-Selva; Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho; Raquel León-Martínez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  One-Piece Implants with Smooth Concave Neck to Enhance Soft Tissue Development and Preserve Marginal Bone Levels: A Retrospective Study with 1- to 6-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Axiotis; Paolo Nuzzolo; Carlo Barausse; Roberta Gasparro; Paolo Bucci; Roberto Pistilli; Gilberto Sammartino; Pietro Felice
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.