Literature DB >> 32661836

Metabolic Parameters as Predictors for Progression Free and Overall Survival of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Zsuzsanna Nemeth1,2, Wouter Wijker3, Zsolt Lengyel4, Erika Hitre5, Katalin Borbely6.   

Abstract

We tested the prognostic relevance of metabolic parameters and their relative changes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with monoclonal antibody and chemotherapy. SUVmax (standardized uptake volume), SAM (standardized added metabolic activity) and TLG (total lesion glycolysis) are assessed with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) to evaluate total metabolic activity of malignant processes. Our purpose was to investigate the change of glucose metabolism in relation to PFS (progression free survival) and OS (overall survival). Fifty-three patients with mCRC with at least one measurable liver metastasis were included in this prospective, multi-center, early exploratory study. All patients were treated with first-line chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Metabolic parameters, like SUVmax, SAM, normalized SAM (NSAM) and TLG were assessed by FDG-PET/CT, carried out at baseline (scan-1) and after two therapeutic cycle (scan-2). Our results suggested neither SUVmax nor TLG have such prognostic value as NSAM in liver metastases of colorectal cancer. The parameters after the two cycles of chemotherapy proved to be better predictors of the clinical outcome. NSAM after two cycles of treatment has a statistically significant predictive value on OS, while SAM was predictive to the PFS. The follow up normalized SAM after 2 cycles of first line oncotherapy was demonstrated to be useful as prognostic biomarkers for OS in metastatic colorectal cancer. We should introduce this measurement in metastatic colorectal cancer if there is at least one metastasis in the liver.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG-PET/CT; Interim; Metastatic colorectal cancer; Overall survival; Progression free survival; Response; Standardized added metabolic activity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32661836      PMCID: PMC7772167          DOI: 10.1007/s12253-020-00865-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  22 in total

1.  Relationship between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation and KRAS/BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Kawada; Yuji Nakamoto; Mayumi Kawada; Koya Hida; Takuya Matsumoto; Teppei Murakami; Suguru Hasegawa; Kaori Togashi; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  The role of FDG-PET/CT in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jana Votrubova; Otakar Belohlavek; Monika Jaruskova; Martin Oliverius; Radka Lohynska; Kristina Trskova; Eva Sedlackova; Ludmila Lipska; Vladimira Stahalova
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Location of colon cancer (right-sided versus left-sided) as a prognostic factor and a predictor of benefit from cetuximab in NCIC CO.17.

Authors:  S Y Brulé; D J Jonker; C S Karapetis; C J O'Callaghan; M J Moore; R Wong; N C Tebbutt; Cr Underhill; D Yip; J R Zalcberg; D Tu; R A Goodwin
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Intermodality comparison between 3D perfusion CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for predicting early tumor response in patients with liver metastasis after chemotherapy: preliminary results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Kim; Se Hyung Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Sae-Won Han; Jin Mo Goo; Jürgen K Willmann; Eun Seong Lee; Jae Seon Eo; Jin Chul Paeng; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 5.  Ras mutational status is a biomarker for resistance to EGFR inhibitors in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wolfram C M Dempke; Volker Heinemann
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group.

Authors:  H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Early prediction by 18F-FDG PET/CT for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving third-line cetuximab-based therapy.

Authors:  Feng-Yuan Liu; Tzu-Chen Yen; Jeng-Yi Wang; Tsai-Sheng Yang
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.794

8.  Comparison of PET metabolic indices for the early assessment of tumour response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated by polychemotherapy.

Authors:  Jacques-Antoine Maisonobe; Camilo A Garcia; Hatem Necib; Bruno Vanderlinden; Alain Hendlisz; Patrick Flamen; Irène Buvat
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Standardized added metabolic activity (SAM) IN ¹⁸F-FDG PET assessment of treatment response in colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Jeroen Mertens; S De Bruyne; N Van Damme; P Smeets; W Ceelen; R Troisi; S Laurent; K Geboes; M Peeters; I Goethals; C Van de Wiele
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Early prediction of response to first-line chemotherapy by sequential [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P Byström; A Berglund; U Garske; H Jacobsson; A Sundin; P Nygren; J-E Frödin; B Glimelius
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  3 in total

1.  Utility of PET Scans in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Tumors.

Authors:  Nandakumar Menon; Mark Mandelkern
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 2.  Clinical implications and mechanism of histopathological growth pattern in colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Bing-Tan Kong; Qing-Sheng Fan; Xiao-Min Wang; Qing Zhang; Gan-Lin Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.374

Review 3.  The Value of 18F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Okker D Bijlstra; Maud M E Boreel; Sietse van Mossel; Mark C Burgmans; Ellen H W Kapiteijn; Daniela E Oprea-Lager; Daphne D D Rietbergen; Floris H P van Velden; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg; J Sven D Mieog; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.