Literature DB >> 24450368

Prognostic factors for successful recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic literature review.

Anouk J M Fermont1, Nienke Wolterbeek, Ronald N Wessel, Jean-Pierre Baeyens, Rob A de Bie.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Systematic literature review.
OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review of the literature on prognostic factors for successful recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff lesion is a common shoulder disorder, with a prevalence ranging from 13% in people over 50 years of age to more than 50% in people over 80 years of age. Several factors can affect the extent to which a person will recover after the surgical repair of a rotator cuff tear. More knowledge about these prognostic factors may lead to a better understanding of why the recovery process is successful in some patients but not in others.
METHODS: A systematic literature search from 1995 to November 2013 was performed to identify studies reporting prognostic factors for successful recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
RESULTS: A total of 455 studies were initially identified, 10 of which were included in the review. For all included studies, the percentage of patients with complete tendon healing at final assessment ranged from 60% to 88%. Twelve prognostic factors, which could be divided into 4 categories, were identified as being associated with better recovery: demographic factors (younger age, male gender), clinical factors (higher bone mineral density, absence of diabetes mellitus, higher level of sports activity, greater preoperative range of motion, absence of obesity), factors related to cuff integrity (smaller sagittal size of the cuff lesion, less retraction of the cuff, less fatty infiltration, no multiple tendon involvement), and factors related to the surgical procedure (no concomitant biceps or acromioclavicular joint procedures).
CONCLUSION: Knowledge and understanding of prognostic factors should be used in the decision-making process concerning arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to offer better care to patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis, level 2a-.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24450368     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  28 in total

Review 1.  Rehabilitation protocol after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: early versus delayed motion.

Authors:  Long Chen; Kun Peng; Dagang Zhang; Jing Peng; Fei Xing; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for the assessment of the rotator cuff after repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Gianpiero Cazzato; Mario Fodale; Giuseppe Sircana; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Prognostic factors influencing the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Gianpiero Cazzato; Fabrizio Donati; Pietro Randelli; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Older Age as a Prognostic Factor of Attenuated Pain Recovery After Shoulder Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Corey B Simon; Joseph L Riley; Rogelio A Coronado; Carolina Valencia; Thomas W Wright; Michael W Moser; Kevin W Farmer; Steven Z George
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Predicting Pain and Disability After Shoulder Arthroscopy: Rotator Cuff Tear Severity and Concomitant Arthroscopic Procedures.

Authors:  Corey B Simon; Rogelio A Coronado; Warren H Greenfield; Carolina Valencia; Thomas W Wright; Michael W Moser; Kevin W Farmer; Steven Z George
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  Prognostic factors of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for tendinopathies.

Authors:  A Notarnicola; G Maccagnano; S Tafuri; A Fiore; C Margiotta; V Pesce; B Moretti
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2015-05-16

7.  Partial and full-thickness rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 45 years.

Authors:  Ahmet Yiğit Kaptan; Coşkun Ulucaköy; Mustafa Özer; Mehmet Çetinkaya; Tacettin Ayanoğlu; Muhammet Baybars Ataoğlu; Ulunay Kanatlı
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.511

8.  Preoperative NSAIDs, non-acute onset and long-standing symptoms predict inferior outcome at long-term follow-up after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Eivind Inderhaug; Kristin H Kollevold; Maiken Kalsvik; Janne Hegna; Eirik Solheim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Predictors of disease-specific quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Arjen Kolk; Nienke Wolterbeek; Kiem Gie Auw Yang; Jacco A C Zijl; Ronald N Wessel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Is routine distal clavicle resection necessary in rotator cuff repair surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ann Livingstone; Rafik Asaid; Afshin Kamali Moaveni
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.