Literature DB >> 26091163

Predicting Pain and Disability After Shoulder Arthroscopy: Rotator Cuff Tear Severity and Concomitant Arthroscopic Procedures.

Corey B Simon1, Rogelio A Coronado, Warren H Greenfield, Carolina Valencia, Thomas W Wright, Michael W Moser, Kevin W Farmer, Steven Z George.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Study the influence of concomitant arthroscopic procedures and rotator cuff tear (RCT) severity on daily pain intensity and disability after shoulder arthroscopy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 145 patients (mean age, 42.66±17.6; number of males=96) completed daily pain intensity and disability measures before shoulder arthroscopy. RCT severity was assessed on a 7-point scale based on operative report. Operative procedures were categorized based on anatomic location and invasiveness to calculate a weighted concomitant procedure estimate. Postoperative daily pain and disability were assessed 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year status after surgery.
RESULTS: Only concomitant procedures were associated with 3-month daily pain intensity after adjusting for age, sex, pain duration, and baseline daily pain intensity (R=0.03; standardized β=0.203; P=0.036). Moreover, post hoc analysis revealed concomitant procedures remained predictive of 3-month daily pain intensity when the estimate was calculated independent of RCT procedures (R=0.05; standardized β=0.233; P=0.007), and when accounting for postoperative factors of physical therapy and analgesic medication (R=0.05; standardized β=0.237; P=0.007). Neither RCT severity nor concomitant procedures were predictive of daily pain intensity at 6 months and 1 year, or disability at any time-point, in the adjusted models (P>0.05). DISCUSSION: This study introduces a novel means for estimating concurrent procedures for use as a prognostic factor. Our findings are similar to previous research of RCT severity that was found to have limited influence on postoperative outcomes. In contrast, this study highlights the potential importance of accounting for concomitant arthroscopic procedures as a predictor of early postoperative pain intensity outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26091163      PMCID: PMC4684489          DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  44 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and mini-open rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Shane J Nho; Michael K Shindle; Seth L Sherman; Kevin B Freedman; Stephan Lyman; John D MacGillivray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Indications for surgery in clinical outcome studies of rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Panagiotis Koulouvaris; Samuel K Chu; Bruce A Levy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Outcomes of arthroscopic and open surgical repair of isolated subscapularis tendon tears.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Jaskarndip Chahal; Wendell M Heard; Bernard R Bach; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Anthony A Romeo; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  The rising incidence of arthroscopic superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) repairs.

Authors:  Ikemefuna Onyekwelu; Omar Khatib; Joseph D Zuckerman; Andrew S Rokito; Young W Kwon
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  National trends in rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Alexis Chiang Colvin; Natalia Egorova; Alicia K Harrison; Alan Moskowitz; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Concomitant arthroscopic SLAP and rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Brian Forsythe; Daniel Guss; Shawn G Anthony; Scott D Martin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Shoulder activity level is not associated with the severity of symptomatic, atraumatic rotator cuff tears in patients electing nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Robert H Brophy; Warren R Dunn; John E Kuhn
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases.

Authors:  R L Daut; C S Cleeland; R C Flanery
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Neuropathic aspects of persistent postsurgical pain: a French multicenter survey with a 6-month prospective follow-up.

Authors:  Christian Dualé; Lemlih Ouchchane; Pierre Schoeffler; Claude Dubray
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Patient characteristics and clinical management of patients with shoulder pain in U.S. primary care settings: secondary data analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

Authors:  James L Wofford; Richard J Mansfield; Raquel S Watkins
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  2 in total

1.  Double-row rotator cuff repairs lead to more intensive pain during the early postoperative period but have a lower risk of residual pain than single-row repairs.

Authors:  Yuzhou Chen; Hong Li; Yang Qiao; Yunshen Ge; Yunxia Li; Yinghui Hua; Jiwu Chen; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biopsychosocial Influences on Shoulder Pain: Analyzing the Temporal Ordering of Postoperative Recovery.

Authors:  Corey B Simon; Carolina Valencia; Rogelio A Coronado; Samuel S Wu; Zhigang Li; Yunfeng Dai; Kevin W Farmer; Michael M Moser; Thomas W Wright; Roger B Fillingim; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 5.820

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.