Literature DB >> 24449796

Minimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation for pediatric patients: clinical feasibility study.

Ramya Balachandran1, Fitsum A Reda, Jack H Noble, Grégoire S Blachon, Benoit M Dawant, J Michael Fitzpatrick, Robert F Labadie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation (CI) involves accessing the cochlea via a linear path from the lateral skull to the cochlea avoiding vital structures including the facial nerve. Herein, we describe and demonstrate the feasibility of the technique for pediatric patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective.
SETTING: Children's Hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirteen pediatric patients (1.5 to 8 years) undergoing traditional CI participated in this Institutional Review Board-approved study. Three fiducial markers were bone-implanted surrounding the ear, and a CT scan was acquired. The CT scan was processed to identify the marker locations and critical structures of the temporal bone. A safe linear path was determined to target the cochlea avoiding damage to vital structures. A custom microstereotactic frame was fabricated that would mount on the fiducial markers and constrain a tool to the desired trajectory. After traditional mastoidectomy and prior to cochleostomy, the custom microstereotactic frame was mounted on the bone-implanted markers to confirm that the achieved trajectory was safe and accurately accessed the cochlea.
RESULTS: For all the 13 patients, it was possible to determine a safe trajectory to the cochlea. Custom microstereotactic frames were validated successfully on 9 patients. Two of these patients had inner ear malformations, and this technique helped the surgeon confirm ideal location for cochleostomy. For patients with normal anatomy, the mean and standard deviation of the closest distance of the trajectory to facial nerve and chorda tympani were 1.1 ± 0.3 mm and 1.2 ± 0.5 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive image-guided CI is feasible for pediatric patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implantation; image-guided surgery; microstereotactic frame; minimally invasive surgery; pediatric cochlear implantation; stereotactic frame

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24449796      PMCID: PMC4431770          DOI: 10.1177/0194599813519050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  16 in total

1.  Minimally invasive, image-guided, facial-recess approach to the middle ear: demonstration of the concept of percutaneous cochlear access in vitro.

Authors:  Robert F Labadie; Pallavi Chodhury; Ebru Cetinkaya; Ramya Balachandran; David S Haynes; Micahel R Fenlon; Andrzej S Jusczyzck; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  W M Wells; P Viola; H Atsumi; S Nakajima; R Kikinis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Comparison of cochlear implant relevant anatomy in children versus adults.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Fitsum A Reda; Alejandro Rivas; Jack H Noble; Mary S Dietrich; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Automatic determination of optimal linear drilling trajectories for cochlear access accounting for drill-positioning error.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Omid Majdani; Robert F Labadie; Benoit Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.547

6.  Surgical considerations in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  W F House
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1982 Mar-Apr

7.  An automatic technique for finding and localizing externally attached markers in CT and MR volume images of the head.

Authors:  M Y Wang; C R Maurer; J M Fitzpatrick; R J Maciunas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Evaluation of portable CT scanners for otologic image-guided surgery.

Authors:  Ramya Balachandran; Daniel Schurzig; J Michael Fitzpatrick; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Automatic segmentation of the facial nerve and chorda tympani in pediatric CT scans.

Authors:  Fitsum A Reda; Jack H Noble; Alejandro Rivas; Theodore R McRackan; Robert F Labadie; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Cochlear implantation in the very young child: Long-term safety and efficacy.

Authors:  J Thomas Roland; Maura Cosetti; Kevin H Wang; Sara Immerman; Susan B Waltzman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  3 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implantation Assisted by Bi-planar Device: An Exploratory Feasibility Study in vitro.

Authors:  Jia Ke; Shao-Xing Zhang; Lei Hu; Chang-Sheng Li; Yun-Feng Zhu; Shi-Long Sun; Li-Feng Wang; Fu-Rong Ma
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Concept description and accuracy evaluation of a moldable surgical targeting system.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Sina Witte; Lea Uhlenbusch; Lüder A Kahrs; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-02-19

3.  Improvements to the retractor and muscle flap design for minimally invasive cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Riyuan Liu; Zhiping Tan; Jianan Li; Yan Yan; Wei Ren; Miao Zhang; Shiming Yang; Hui Zhao
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2019-09-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.