Literature DB >> 24448896

Comment on Tian et al.: Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence.

Feng Li1, Hongjun Huo, Xuejun Yang, Yulong Xiao, Wenhua Xing, Hong Xia.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24448896      PMCID: PMC3960422          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3176-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Yue Zhou; Zheng Feng Zhang; Chang Qing Li; Wen Jie Zheng; Jie Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

3.  Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Yue Zhou; Zheng Feng Zhang; Chang Qing Li; Wen Jie Zheng; Jie Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Yao-Sen Wu; Xiao-Lei Zhang; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Long Chi; Fang-Min Mao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

  4 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Prashanth J Rao; Andrew C Kam; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.