Literature DB >> 35102494

Efficacy of regional anesthesia techniques for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing major oncologic breast surgeries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Narinder Pal Singh1, Jeetinder Kaur Makkar2, Aswini Kuberan3, Ryan Guffey4, Vishal Uppal5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal regional technique to control pain after breast cancer surgery remains unclear. We sought to synthesize available data from randomized controlled trials comparing pain-related outcomes following various regional techniques for major oncologic breast surgery.
METHODS: In a systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched trials in PubMed, Embase Scopus, Medline, Cochrane Central and Google Scholar, from inception to 31 July 2020, for commonly used regional techniques. The primary outcome was the 24-hr resting pain score measured on a numerical rating score of 0-10. We used surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to establish the probability of an intervention ranking highest. The analysis was performed using the Bayesian random effects model, and effect sizes are reported as 95% credible interval (Crl). We conducted cluster-rank analysis by combining 24-hr pain ranking with 24-hr opioid use or incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine randomized controlled trials containing 11 different interventions in 5,686 patients were included. The SUCRA values of the interventions for 24-hr resting pain score were continuous paravertebral block (0.83), serratus anterior plane block (0.76), continuous wound infusion (0.76), single-level paravertebral block (0.68), erector spinae plane block (0.59), modified pectoral block (0.49), intercostal block (0.45), multilevel paravertebral block (0.41), wound infiltration (0.33), no intervention (0.12), and placebo (0.08). When compared with placebo, the continuous paravertebral block (mean difference, 1.26; 95% Crl, 0.43 to 2.12) and serratus anterior plane block (mean difference, 1.12; 95% Crl, 0.32 to 1.9) had the highest estimated probability of decreasing 24-hr resting pain scores. Cluster ranking analysis combining 24-hr resting pain scores and opioid use showed that most regional analgesia techniques were more effective than no intervention or placebo. Nevertheless, wound infiltration and continuous wound infusion may be the least effective active interventions for reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting.
CONCLUSION: Continuous paravertebral block and serratus anterior plane block had a high probability of reducing pain at 24 hr after major oncologic breast surgery. The certainty of evidence was moderate to very low. Future studies should compare different regional anesthesia techniques, including surgeon-administered techniques such as wound infiltration or catheters. Trials comparing active intervention with placebo are unlikely to change clinical practice. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020198244); registered 19 October 2020.
© 2022. Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  erector spinae block; modified pectoral nerve block; oncologic breast surgery; paravertebral block; postoperative analgesia; regional technique; serratus anterior plane block; wound infiltration

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35102494     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-021-02183-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   6.713


  80 in total

1.  Risk factors for chronic pain following breast cancer surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ellen L Poleshuck; Jennifer Katz; Carl H Andrus; Laura A Hogan; Beth F Jung; Dale I Kulick; Robert H Dworkin
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Thoracic paravertebral block and its effects on chronic pain and health-related quality of life after modified radical mastectomy.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Karmakar; Winnie Samy; Jia W Li; Anna Lee; Wing Cheong Chan; Phoon P Chen; Anthony M-H Ho
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.288

3.  Breast development and anatomy.

Authors:  Sonali Pandya; Richard G Moore
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Analgesic efficacy of the Pecs II block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Versyck; G-J van Geffen; K-J Chin
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Pectoralis-II Myofascial Block and Analgesia in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nasir Hussain; Richard Brull; Colin J L McCartney; Patrick Wong; Nicolas Kumar; Michael Essandoh; Tamara Sawyer; Timothy Sullivan; Faraj W Abdallah
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Rune Gärtner; Maj-Britt Jensen; Jeanette Nielsen; Marianne Ewertz; Niels Kroman; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.

Authors:  Brian Hutton; Georgia Salanti; Deborah M Caldwell; Anna Chaimani; Christopher H Schmid; Chris Cameron; John P A Ioannidis; Sharon Straus; Kristian Thorlund; Jeroen P Jansen; Cynthia Mulrow; Ferrán Catalá-López; Peter C Gøtzsche; Kay Dickersin; Isabelle Boutron; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Standardizing nomenclature in regional anesthesia: an ASRA-ESRA Delphi consensus study of abdominal wall, paraspinal, and chest wall blocks.

Authors:  Kariem El-Boghdadly; Morné Wolmarans; Angela D Stengel; Eric Albrecht; Ki Jinn Chin; Hesham Elsharkawy; Sandra Kopp; Edward R Mariano; Jeff L Xu; Sanjib Adhikary; Başak Altıparmak; Michael J Barrington; Sébastien Bloc; Rafael Blanco; Karen Boretsky; Jens Børglum; Margaretha Breebaart; David Burckett-St Laurent; Xavier Capdevila; Brendan Carvalho; Alwin Chuan; Steve Coppens; Ioana Costache; Mette Dam; Christian Egeler; Mario Fajardo; Jeff Gadsden; Philippe Emmanuel Gautier; Stuart Alan Grant; Admir Hadzic; Peter Hebbard; Nadia Hernandez; Rosemary Hogg; Margaret Holtz; Rebecca L Johnson; Manoj Kumar Karmakar; Paul Kessler; Kwesi Kwofie; Clara Lobo; Danielle Ludwin; Alan MacFarlane; John McDonnell; Graeme McLeod; Peter Merjavy; Eml Moran; Brian D O'Donnell; Teresa Parras; Amit Pawa; Anahi Perlas; Maria Fernanda Rojas Gomez; Xavier Sala-Blanch; Andrea Saporito; Sanjay Kumar Sinha; Ellen M Soffin; Athmaja Thottungal; Ban C H Tsui; Serkan Tulgar; Lloyd Turbitt; Vishal Uppal; Geert J van Geffen; Thomas Volk; Nabil M Elkassabany
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 6.288

9.  Impact of a continuous enhanced cardio-respiratory monitoring pathway on cardio-respiratory complications after bariatric surgery: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chenchen Tian; Laura Hawryluck; George Tomlinson; Frances Chung; Scott Beattie; Matthew Miller; Najia Hassan; David T Wong; Jean Wong; Julie Hudson; Timothy Jackson; Mandeep Singh
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 9.452

10.  Use of re-randomized data in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Iztok Hozo; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Otavio Clark; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  3 in total

1.  Fascial plane blocks: moving from the expansionist to the reductionist era.

Authors:  Jonathan G Bailey; Vishal Uppal
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.713

2.  Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Thoracolumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dmitriy Viderman; Mina Aubakirova; Yerlan Umbetzhanov; Gulnara Kulkaeva; S B Shalekenov; Yerkin G Abdildin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  Anatomical classification and clinical application of thoracic paraspinal blocks.

Authors:  Shin Hyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-04-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.