Literature DB >> 24448192

Reconstruction with expandable cages after single- and multilevel corpectomies for spinal metastases: a prospective case series of 60 patients.

Godard C W de Ruiter1, Daniel J Lobatto2, Jasper F Wolfs2, Wilco C Peul3, Mark P Arts2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Expandable cages are widely used to reconstruct the spine after the removal of vertebral metastases. Long-term results, however, are lacking, and there is little information on reconstruction after multilevel corpectomies.
PURPOSE: To determine long-term outcome for reconstruction of the spine with expandable cages after single and multilevel corpectomies for spinal metastases. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of 60 consecutive patients with spinal metastases treated with expandable cages.
METHODS: All patients were prospectively followed with regular clinical and radiographic evaluation. Outcome measures were the Frankel score, patients' self-reported recovery, radiological alignment of the spine, and neurologic plus biomechanical complications.
RESULTS: Sixty patients were treated with expandable cages in our hospital in a 5-year period with a maximum follow-up of 6 years. Single-level reconstruction was performed in 48 cases, 2-level in 8, and 3-level in 4. Postoperatively, the Frankel score had improved significantly (p=.03), the segment height had increased (p=.02), and, in severe cases of kyphosis (>20°), the regional angulation had been corrected compared with preoperatively (p<.001). Complication rate, however, was high (36.7%), in particular after multilevel reconstruction, in which three cases had to be reoperated years after the initial surgery; reasons for this were hardware failure, progressive kyphosis, and bronchial perforation. Good recovery was reported in 70% of all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Expandable cages can be used successfully in reconstruction of the spine after single and multilevel corpectomies for spinal metastases. However, long-term complication rate is high. Promotion of bony fusion, prevention of soft-tissue damage, adequate posterior stabilization, and careful patient selection may reduce these complications.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decompression; Spinal instrumentation; Spinal tumors; Stabilization; Surgery; Surgical procedure

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24448192     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  5 in total

Review 1.  Basic concepts in metal work failure after metastatic spine tumour surgery.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Ravish Patel; Anshuja Charvi Wadhwa; Aravind Kumar; Helena Maria Milavec; Dhiraj Sonawane; Gurpal Singh; Lorin Michael Benneker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Surgical complications of extraspinal tumors in the cervical spine: a report of 110 cases and literature review.

Authors:  WenHua Yang; Liang Jiang; XiaoGuang Liu; Feng Wei; Miao Yu; FengLiang Wu; Lei Dang; Hua Zhou; Hua Zhang; ZhongJun Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Sublaminar bands in oncological spine surgery: illustrative cases.

Authors:  Godard C W de Ruiter; Valerio Pipola; Cristiana Griffoni; Alessandro Gasbarrini
Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons       Date:  2021-05-24

4.  Hardware Failure in Spinal Tumor Surgery: A Hallmark of Longer Survival?

Authors:  Nikita Zaborovskii; Adam Schlauch; Dmitrii Ptashnikov; Dmitrii Mikaylov; Sergei Masevnin; Oleg Smekalenkov; John Shapton; Dimitriy Kondrashov
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-03-31

5.  Does Mesh Cage Subsidence Have any Effect on Functional Outcome in Spinal Tuberculosis?

Authors:  Tushar Narayan Rathod; Abhinav Dinesh Jogani; Nandan Marathe; Kalaivanan Masilamani; Chetan Vitthalrao Shende; Prashant Kamble
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-11-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.