Literature DB >> 24447842

Toward a proper estimation of phase-amplitude coupling in neural oscillations.

Dino Dvorak1, André A Fenton2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) between distinct neural oscillations is critical to brain functions that include cross-scale organization, selection of attention, routing the flow of information through neural circuits, memory processing and information coding. Several methods for PAC estimation have been proposed but the limitations of PAC estimation as well as the assumptions about the data for accurate PAC estimation are unclear. NEW
METHOD: We define boundary conditions for standard PAC algorithms and propose "oscillation-triggered coupling" (OTC), a parameter-free, data-driven algorithm for unbiased estimation of PAC. OTC establishes a unified framework that treats individual oscillations as discrete events for estimating PAC from a set of oscillations and for characterizing events from time windows as short as a single modulating oscillation.
RESULTS: For accurate PAC estimation, standard PAC algorithms require amplitude filters with a bandwidth at least twice the modulatory frequency. The phase filters must be moderately narrow-band, especially when the modulatory rhythm is non-sinusoidal. The minimally appropriate analysis window is ∼10s. We then demonstrate that OTC can characterize PAC by treating neural oscillations as discrete events rather than continuous phase and amplitude time series. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHODS: These findings show that in addition to providing the same information about PAC as the standard approach, OTC facilitates characterization of single oscillations and their sequences, in addition to explaining the role of individual oscillations in generating PAC patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: OTC allows PAC analysis at the level of individual oscillations and therefore enables investigation of PAC at the time scales of cognitive phenomena.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coupling; Event; Gamma; Modulation; Oscillation; PAC; Theta

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24447842      PMCID: PMC3955271          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  47 in total

1.  Assessing transient cross-frequency coupling in EEG data.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers.

Authors:  György Buzsáki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Theta-gamma coupling increases during the learning of item-context associations.

Authors:  Adriano B L Tort; Robert W Komorowski; Joseph R Manns; Nancy J Kopell; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A neural cocktail-party processor.

Authors:  C von der Malsburg; W Schneider
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Gamma oscillations in the entorhinal cortex of the freely behaving rat.

Authors:  J J Chrobak; G Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Cross-frequency coupling supports multi-item working memory in the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Nikolai Axmacher; Melanie M Henseler; Ole Jensen; Ilona Weinreich; Christian E Elger; Juergen Fell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The spiking component of oscillatory extracellular potentials in the rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Erik W Schomburg; Costas A Anastassiou; György Buzsáki; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Unmasking the CA1 ensemble place code by exposures to small and large environments: more place cells and multiple, irregularly arranged, and expanded place fields in the larger space.

Authors:  André A Fenton; Hsin-Yi Kao; Samuel A Neymotin; Andrey Olypher; Yevgeniy Vayntrub; William W Lytton; Nandor Ludvig
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Laura L Colgin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Relationships between hippocampal sharp waves, ripples, and fast gamma oscillation: influence of dentate and entorhinal cortical activity.

Authors:  David Sullivan; Jozsef Csicsvari; Kenji Mizuseki; Sean Montgomery; Kamran Diba; György Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  49 in total

1.  Ripple oscillations in the left temporal neocortex are associated with impaired verbal episodic memory encoding.

Authors:  Zachary J Waldman; Liliana Camarillo-Rodriguez; Inna Chervenova; Brent Berry; Shoichi Shimamoto; Bahareh Elahian; Michal Kucewicz; Chaitanya Ganne; Xiao-Song He; Leon A Davis; Joel Stein; Sandhitsu Das; Richard Gorniak; Ashwini D Sharan; Robert Gross; Cory S Inman; Bradley C Lega; Kareem Zaghloul; Barbara C Jobst; Katheryn A Davis; Paul Wanda; Mehraneh Khadjevand; Joseph Tracy; Daniel S Rizzuto; Gregory Worrell; Michael Sperling; Shennan A Weiss
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.937

2.  Deletion of Fmr1 from Forebrain Excitatory Neurons Triggers Abnormal Cellular, EEG, and Behavioral Phenotypes in the Auditory Cortex of a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Jonathan W Lovelace; Maham Rais; Arnold R Palacios; Xinghao S Shuai; Steven Bishay; Otilia Popa; Patricia S Pirbhoy; Devin K Binder; David L Nelson; Iryna M Ethell; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Gating by induced Α-Γ asynchrony in selective attention.

Authors:  David Pascucci; Alexis Hervais-Adelman; Gijs Plomp
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Conundrums of high-frequency oscillations (80-800 Hz) in the epileptic brain.

Authors:  Liset Menendez de la Prida; Richard J Staba; Joshua A Dian
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.177

5.  Sleep as a Potential Biomarker of Tau and β-Amyloid Burden in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Joseph R Winer; Bryce A Mander; Randolph F Helfrich; Anne Maass; Theresa M Harrison; Suzanne L Baker; Robert T Knight; William J Jagust; Matthew P Walker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Sleep Disturbance Forecasts β-Amyloid Accumulation across Subsequent Years.

Authors:  Joseph R Winer; Bryce A Mander; Samika Kumar; Mark Reed; Suzanne L Baker; William J Jagust; Matthew P Walker
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  Excitation-inhibition discoordination in rodent models of mental disorders.

Authors:  André A Fenton
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  The demodulated band transform.

Authors:  Christopher K Kovach; Phillip E Gander
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Closed-Loop Slow-Wave tACS Improves Sleep-Dependent Long-Term Memory Generalization by Modulating Endogenous Oscillations.

Authors:  Nicholas Ketz; Aaron P Jones; Natalie B Bryant; Vincent P Clark; Praveen K Pilly
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Phencyclidine Discoordinates Hippocampal Network Activity But Not Place Fields.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Kao; Dino Dvořák; EunHye Park; Jana Kenney; Eduard Kelemen; André A Fenton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.