Literature DB >> 24447653

Stable transmission of Dirofilaria repens nematodes, northern Germany.

Christina Czajka, Norbert Becker, Hanna Jöst, Sven Poppert, Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit, Andreas Krüger, Egbert Tannich.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dirofilaria repens; Germany; dirofilariosis; nematodes; parasites; transmission; zoonoses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24447653      PMCID: PMC3901495          DOI: 10.3201/eid2002.131003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Dirofilariosis caused by infection with the filarial nematode Dirofilaria repens is considered an emerging zoonosis in Europe (). The main reservoirs for this parasite are dogs and other carnivores. As is the case for other filarial species, mosquitoes transmit infectious third-stage larvae, which develop into fertile adults in their definitive vertebrate hosts. Humans may become infected as aberrant hosts, and, in most cases, these worms remain infertile (,). Infections in humans usually manifest as subcutaneous nodules, which are caused by developing worms that are trapped by immune mechanisms (). Subcutaneous migration of a worm may result in local swelling. Severe clinical manifestations have also been reported and may affect various organs, including the brain, lung, and eye (,). Eye infections are found in particular during the migratory phase of the parasite. Transmission of D. repens occurs in various regions of the Old World, including Europe, Africa, and Asia. The primary areas in Europe to which D. repens is endemic are countries of the Mediterranean region, where warm temperatures enable development of infectious third-stage larvae in mosquitoes. However, during the past decade, several autochthonous cases of canine and human dirofilariasis have been reported from countries farther north, including Austria, the Czech Republic, and Poland (–). Several factors might be responsible for this spread to the north, including climate change and increased translocation of dogs from southern to central Europe. Until recently, central Europe, including Germany, was not considered a region to which D. repens was endemic. However, a survey in 44 hunting dogs from the Upper Rhine region showed that 3 animals were positive for D. repens microfilariae (). In addition, testing of a kennel of sled dogs located in the federal state of Brandenburg, near Berlin, found 8 of 28 animals were infected with the parasite (). To determine whether local transmission of D. repens is taking place in Germany, we retrospectively analyzed 74,547 mosquitoes from a large-scale German mosquito-borne virus surveillance program for the presence of filarial DNA. Mosquitoes were collected during the main animal-trapping seasons (May–September) 2011 and 2012 by using carbon dioxide–baited encephalitis virus surveillance or gravid traps (). Mosquitoes were collected from 55 trapping sites located in 9 federal states in the southwest and northeastern parts of Germany (Figure), frozen at −70°C, and transported to the laboratory at the Bernhard Nocht Institute, where they were classified morphologically to the species level. Up to 25 mosquitoes of the same species from individual collection sites were subsequently combined to create a total of 4,113 pools. These pools comprised a broad range of ornithophilic and mammalophilic mosquitoes common in Germany; Culex spp. and Aedes vexans were the most abundant species.
Figure

Origin of mosquito samples analyzed for infection with Dirofilaria repens, by federal state, Germany, May–September 2011 and 2012 (n = 74,547). Black dots indicate collection locations of mosquitoes that tested positive for D. repens DNA.

Origin of mosquito samples analyzed for infection with Dirofilaria repens, by federal state, Germany, May–September 2011 and 2012 (n = 74,547). Black dots indicate collection locations of mosquitoes that tested positive for D. repens DNA. Nucleic acids were extracted from each mosquito pool, and the presence of filarial DNA was determined by PCR using a set of generic primers that amplify DNA from a broad range of filarial species, including those affecting birds and other animals (). A total of 1,050 (25.5%) of the 4,113 pools were found to be positive for filarial DNA. To further determine if any of these pools contained DNA from D. repens, we analyzed all 1,050 pools by PCR using the D. repens–specific primers 5′-GAGATGGCGTTTCCTCGTG-3′ and 5′-GACCATCAACACTTAAAG-3′. Four pools were positive for D. repens DNA; all of these pools consisted of mammalophilic mosquitoes collected at 2 trapping sites in the federal state of Brandenburg, near Oder Valley, at a latitude of 52°N (global positioning satellite coordinates 52°47′N, 14°14′E, and 52°51′N, 14°7′E). One pool, consisting of Culiseta annulata mosquitoes, was collected in August 2011; the other 3 pools, 2 of Anopheles maculipennis sensu lato and 1 of Ae. vexans mosquitoes, were trapped in July and August 2012. The identification of D. repens DNA in all 4 pools was confirmed by DNA sequencing of a 538-bp fragment of the gene encoding cytochrome oxidase 1 (GenBank accession no. KF410864). Sequence comparisons indicated 99.8% identity to the same gene in a D. repens nematode isolate from Italy (accession no. AM749234). In conclusion, we found mosquitoes that were positive for D. repens DNA at a latitude of 52°N in northern Germany; these mosquitoes, from 3 species, were collected at 2 locations in 2011 and 2012. Our findings support recent projections that have suggested increases in average temperatures could affect climatic conditions during summer sufficiently to enable development of D. repens larvae in central Europe at latitudes of up to 56°N (). In the federal state of Brandenburg in Germany, conditions for larval development were predicted to be sufficient in each of the past 12 years. These projections, together with our finding of mosquitoes carrying D. repens in Brandenburg in 2 successive years and the recurrent detection of infected dogs in this area (), present a strong case for the existence of stable local transmission of D. repens in this region of Germany.

Technical Appendix

PCR analyses of mosquitoes from various federal states of Germany for the presence of filarial DNA.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Human dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria (Nochtiella) repens: an update of world literature from 1995 to 2000.

Authors:  S Pampiglione; F Rivasi
Journal:  Parassitologia       Date:  2000-12

2.  Human dirofilariosis in Poland: the first cases of autochthonous infections with Dirofilaria repens.

Authors:  Danuta Cielecka; Hanna Żarnowska-Prymek; Aleksander Masny; Ruslan Salamatin; Maria Wesołowska; Elżbieta Gołąb
Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.447

Review 3.  Dirofilarial infections in Europe.

Authors:  Claudio Genchi; Laura H Kramer; Francesco Rivasi
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.133

4.  Changing climate and changing vector-borne disease distribution: the example of Dirofilaria in Europe.

Authors:  Claudio Genchi; Michele Mortarino; Laura Rinaldi; Giuseppe Cringoli; Giorgio Traldi; Marco Genchi
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.738

5.  Current surveys on the prevalence and distribution of Dirofilaria spp. in dogs in Germany.

Authors:  Nikola Pantchev; Nina Norden; Leif Lorentzen; Marco Rossi; Ulrike Rossi; Bastian Brand; Viktor Dyachenko
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Is Dirofilaria repens endemic in the Havelland district in Brandenburg, Germany?

Authors:  Reinhold Sassnau; Mareen Kohn; Janina Demeler; Barbara Kohn; Elisabeth Müller; Jürgen Krücken; Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.133

7.  [The first autochthonous case of subcutaneous dirofilariosis in Austria].

Authors:  Herbert Auer; Martin Susani
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Molecular detection of Setaria tundra (Nematoda: Filarioidea) and an unidentified filarial species in mosquitoes in Germany.

Authors:  Christina Czajka; Norbert Becker; Sven Poppert; Hanna Jöst; Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit; Andreas Krüger
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Dirofilaria repens infection and concomitant meningoencephalitis.

Authors:  Sven Poppert; Maike Hodapp; Andreas Krueger; Guido Hegasy; Wolf Dirk Niesen; Winfried V Kern; Egbert Tannich
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.883

  9 in total
  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Adulticidal Efficacy of Imidacloprid 10 %/Moxidectin 2.5 % (w/v) Spot-on (Advocate®, Advantage® Multi) against Dirofilaria repens in Experimentally Infected Dogs.

Authors:  Gabriele Petry; Marco Genchi; Holger Schmidt; Roland Schaper; Bettina Lawrenz; Claudio Genchi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Zoonotic Dirofilaria repens (Nematoda: Filarioidea) in Aedes vexans mosquitoes, Czech Republic.

Authors:  Ivo Rudolf; Oldřich Šebesta; Jan Mendel; Lenka Betášová; Eva Bocková; Petra Jedličková; Kristýna Venclíková; Hana Blažejová; Silvie Šikutová; Zdeněk Hubálek
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Dirofilaria repens and Dirofilaria immitis DNA findings in mosquitoes in Germany: temperature data allow autochthonous extrinsic development.

Authors:  R Sassnau; C Czajka; M Kronefeld; D Werner; C Genchi; E Tannich; H Kampen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Blood parasites in reptiles imported to Germany.

Authors:  Ursula Halla; Halla Ursula; Rüdiger Korbel; Korbel Rüdiger; Frank Mutschmann; Mutschmann Frank; Monika Rinder; Rinder Monika
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Estimated specific antibody-based true sero-prevalences of canine filariosis in dogs in Central Europe and the UK.

Authors:  Paul Torgerson; Peter Deplazes; Jeannine E Fehr; Manuela Schnyder; Deborah E Joekel; Nikola Pantchev; Mindaugas Sarkunas
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.383

6.  Is molecular xenomonitoring of mosquitoes for Dirofilaria repens suitable for dirofilariosis surveillance in endemic regions?

Authors:  Aleksander Masny; Rusłan Sałamatin; Wioletta Rozej-Bielicka; Elzbieta Golab
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 7.  The Anopheles maculipennis complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Germany: an update following recent monitoring activities.

Authors:  Helge Kampen; Mandy Schäfer; Dorothee E Zielke; Doreen Walther
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.289

8.  No evidence of Dirofilaria repens infection in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) from Brandenburg, Germany.

Authors:  Vera Härtwig; Christoph Schulze; Martin Pfeffer; Arwid Daugschies; Viktor Dyachenko
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.289

9.  Species composition, geographical distribution and seasonal abundance of the Anopheles maculipennis complex along the Upper Rhine, Germany.

Authors:  C Czajka; T Weitzel; A Kaiser; W P Pfitzner; N Becker
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Autochthonous Dirofilaria repens in Austria.

Authors:  Katja Silbermayr; Barbara Eigner; Anja Joachim; Georg G Duscher; Bernhard Seidel; Franz Allerberger; Alexander Indra; Peter Hufnagl; Hans-Peter Fuehrer
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.