Nils Heits1, Leonie Stapel1, Benedikt Reichert1, Clemens Schafmayer1, Bodo Schniewind2, Thomas Becker1, Jochen Hampe3, Jan-Hendrik Egberts4. 1. Department of General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany. 2. Department of General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, Hospital of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 4. Department of General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany. Electronic address: jan-hendrik.egberts@uksh-kiel.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Esophageal perforation is a serious disease with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is a new endoscopic treatment option, which is used to treat anastomotic leakages after rectal and esophageal resections. We report on 10 patients treated with EVT for esophageal perforation. METHODS: Clinical and therapy-related data such as age, sex, duration of intensive care stay, length of hospital stay, reasons for perforation, EVT-associated complications, mortality, need for alternative treatment options, and course of infectious variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Ten patients were treated with 54 vacuum sponges that were placed in upper gastrointestinal defects. Causes for perforation were iatrogenic, spontaneous, or foreign body-associated. Mean number of sponge insertions was 5.4 (range, 2 to 12) with a mean period of 19 ± 14.26 days. Successful therapy was achieved in 9 of 10 patients. After successful primary treatment, 1 patient died during therapy as a result of general failure of the cardiovascular system. In 1 patient, surgical resection was necessary after repeated Mallory-Weiss lesions and minor perforations during the course of immunosuppressive therapy. In a third patient an endoscopic stent was inserted in the clean wound cavity after primary EVT. CONCLUSIONS: In this small trial EVT has been shown to be a safe and feasible therapy option for perforations of the upper gastrointestinal tract. If necessary, EVT can be combined with operative revision for better control of the local septic focus or used as a bridging procedure for wound conditioning before aggressive surgical treatment.
BACKGROUND: Esophageal perforation is a serious disease with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is a new endoscopic treatment option, which is used to treat anastomotic leakages after rectal and esophageal resections. We report on 10 patients treated with EVT for esophageal perforation. METHODS: Clinical and therapy-related data such as age, sex, duration of intensive care stay, length of hospital stay, reasons for perforation, EVT-associated complications, mortality, need for alternative treatment options, and course of infectious variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Ten patients were treated with 54 vacuum sponges that were placed in upper gastrointestinal defects. Causes for perforation were iatrogenic, spontaneous, or foreign body-associated. Mean number of sponge insertions was 5.4 (range, 2 to 12) with a mean period of 19 ± 14.26 days. Successful therapy was achieved in 9 of 10 patients. After successful primary treatment, 1 patient died during therapy as a result of general failure of the cardiovascular system. In 1 patient, surgical resection was necessary after repeated Mallory-Weiss lesions and minor perforations during the course of immunosuppressive therapy. In a third patient an endoscopic stent was inserted in the clean wound cavity after primary EVT. CONCLUSIONS: In this small trial EVT has been shown to be a safe and feasible therapy option for perforations of the upper gastrointestinal tract. If necessary, EVT can be combined with operative revision for better control of the local septic focus or used as a bridging procedure for wound conditioning before aggressive surgical treatment.
Authors: Sameer A Dhayat; Rosanna Schacht; Rudolf Mennigen; Daniel Palmes; Thomas Vogel; Thorsten Vowinkel; Norbert Senninger; Mike Georg Laukoetter Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Fausto Biancari; Tuomas Tauriainen; Tatu Ylikotila; Misa Kokkonen; Jukka Rintala; Elisa Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck; Vesa Koivukangas; Juha Saarnio Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Mike G Laukoetter; Rudolf Mennigen; Philipp A Neumann; Sameer Dhayat; Gabriele Horst; Daniel Palmes; Norbert Senninger; Thorsten Vowinkel Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 4.584