Literature DB >> 24444512

Understanding the translation of scientific knowledge about arsenic risk exposure among private well water users in Nova Scotia.

Heather Chappells1, Norma Campbell2, John Drage3, Conrad V Fernandez4, Louise Parker5, Trevor J B Dummer6.   

Abstract

Arsenic is a class I human carcinogen that has been identified as the second most important global health concern in groundwater supplies after contamination by pathogenic organisms. Hydrogeological assessments have shown naturally occurring arsenic to be widespread in groundwater across the northeastern United States and eastern Canada. Knowledge of arsenic risk exposure among private well users in these arsenic endemic areas has not yet been fully explored but research on water quality perceptions indicates a consistent misalignment between public and scientific assessments of environmental risk. This paper evaluates knowledge of arsenic risk exposure among a demographic cross-section of well users residing in 5 areas of Nova Scotia assessed to be at variable risk (high-low) of arsenic occurrence in groundwater based on water sample analysis. An integrated knowledge-to-action (KTA) methodological approach is utilized to comprehensively assess the personal, social and local factors shaping perception of well water contaminant risks and the translation of knowledge into routine water testing behaviors. Analysis of well user survey data (n=420) reveals a high level of confidence in well water quality that is unrelated to the relative risk of arsenic exposure or homeowner adherence to government testing recommendations. Further analysis from the survey and in-depth well user interviews (n=32) finds that well users' assessments of risk are influenced by personal experience, local knowledge, social networks and convenience of infrastructure rather than by formal information channels, which are largely failing to reach their target audiences. Insights from interviews with stakeholders representing government health and environment agencies (n=15) are used to reflect on the institutional barriers that mediate the translation of scientific knowledge into public awareness and stewardship behaviors. The utilization of local knowledge brokers, community-based networks and regulatory incentives to improve risk knowledge and support routine testing among private well users is discussed.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Drinking water; Health risks; Knowledge translation; Private wells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24444512     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  8 in total

1.  Improve private well testing outreach efficiency by targeting households based on proximity to a high arsenic well.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven E Spayd; Jessie A Gleason; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  Lessons Learned from Arsenic Mitigation among Private Well Households.

Authors:  Yan Zheng
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-09

3.  At the crossroads: Hazard assessment and reduction of health risks from arsenic in private well waters of the northeastern United States and Atlantic Canada.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Joseph D Ayotte
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Factors influencing perceptions of private water quality in North America: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abraham Munene; David C Hall
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-10

5.  Risk Communication and Factors Influencing Private Well Testing Behavior: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sarah K Colley; Peter K M Kane; Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Impact of the 2012 extreme drought conditions on private well owners in the United States, a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Michelle Murti; Ellen Yard; Rachel Kramer; Dirk Haselow; Mike Mettler; Rocky McElvany; Colleen Martin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Different Choices of Drinking Water Source and Different Health Risks in a Rural Population Living Near a Lead/Zinc Mine in Chenzhou City, Southern China.

Authors:  Xiao Huang; Liping He; Jun Li; Fei Yang; Hongzhuan Tan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  The Case for Universal Screening of Private Well Water Quality in the U.S. and Testing Requirements to Achieve It: Evidence from Arsenic.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Sara V Flanagan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.