BACKGROUND: Patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis may have phenotypic heterogeneity in results of drug-susceptibility tests (DSTs). However, the impact of this on clinical outcomes among patients treated for MDR tuberculosis is unknown. METHODS: Phenotypic DST heterogeneity was defined as presence of at least 1 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolate susceptible to rifampicin and isoniazid recovered <3 months after MDR tuberculosis treatment initiation from a patient with previous documented tuberculosis due to M. tuberculosis resistant to at least rifampicin and isoniazid. The primary outcome was defined as good (ie, cure or treatment completion) or poor (ie, treatment failure, treatment default, or death). A secondary outcome was time to culture conversion. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association between phenotypic DST heterogeneity and outcomes. RESULTS: Phenotypic DST heterogeneity was identified in 33 of 475 patients (7%) with MDR tuberculosis. Poor outcome occurred in 126 patients (28%). Overall, patients with MDR tuberculosis who had phenotypic DST heterogeneity were at greater risk of poor outcome than those with MDR tuberculosis but no phenotypic DST heterogeneity (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.6). Among HIV-infected patients with MDR tuberculosis, the adjusted hazard for a poor outcome for those with phenotypic DST heterogeneity was 2.4 (95% CI, 1.3-4.2) times that for those without phenotypic DST heterogeneity, whereas among HIV-negative patients with MDR tuberculosis, the adjusted hazard for those with phenotypic DST heterogeneity was 1.5 (95% CI, .5-4.3) times that for those without phenotypic DST heterogeneity. HIV-infected patients with MDR tuberculosis with phenotypic DST heterogeneity also had a longer time to culture conversion than with HIV-infected patients with MDR tuberculosis without phenotypic DST heterogeneity (aHR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-6.0). CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypic DST heterogeneity among persons with HIV infection who are being treated for MDR tuberculosis is associated with poor outcomes and longer times to culture conversion.
BACKGROUND:Patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis may have phenotypic heterogeneity in results of drug-susceptibility tests (DSTs). However, the impact of this on clinical outcomes among patients treated for MDR tuberculosis is unknown. METHODS: Phenotypic DST heterogeneity was defined as presence of at least 1 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolate susceptible to rifampicin and isoniazid recovered <3 months after MDR tuberculosis treatment initiation from a patient with previous documented tuberculosis due to M. tuberculosis resistant to at least rifampicin and isoniazid. The primary outcome was defined as good (ie, cure or treatment completion) or poor (ie, treatment failure, treatment default, or death). A secondary outcome was time to culture conversion. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association between phenotypic DST heterogeneity and outcomes. RESULTS: Phenotypic DST heterogeneity was identified in 33 of 475 patients (7%) with MDR tuberculosis. Poor outcome occurred in 126 patients (28%). Overall, patients with MDR tuberculosis who had phenotypic DST heterogeneity were at greater risk of poor outcome than those with MDR tuberculosis but no phenotypic DST heterogeneity (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.6). Among HIV-infectedpatients with MDR tuberculosis, the adjusted hazard for a poor outcome for those with phenotypic DST heterogeneity was 2.4 (95% CI, 1.3-4.2) times that for those without phenotypic DST heterogeneity, whereas among HIV-negative patients with MDR tuberculosis, the adjusted hazard for those with phenotypic DST heterogeneity was 1.5 (95% CI, .5-4.3) times that for those without phenotypic DST heterogeneity. HIV-infectedpatients with MDR tuberculosis with phenotypic DST heterogeneity also had a longer time to culture conversion than with HIV-infectedpatients with MDR tuberculosis without phenotypic DST heterogeneity (aHR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-6.0). CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypic DST heterogeneity among persons with HIV infection who are being treated for MDR tuberculosis is associated with poor outcomes and longer times to culture conversion.
Authors: A van Rie; R Warren; M Richardson; T C Victor; R P Gie; D A Enarson; N Beyers; P D van Helden Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-10-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: B Madison; B Robinson-Dunn; I George; W Gross; H Lipman; B Metchock; A Sloutsky; G Washabaugh; G Mazurek; J Ridderhof Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Sebastien Gagneux; Clara Davis Long; Peter M Small; Tran Van; Gary K Schoolnik; Brendan J M Bohannan Journal: Science Date: 2006-06-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Annelies van Rie; Thomas C Victor; Madalene Richardson; Rabia Johnson; Gian D van der Spuy; Emma J Murray; Nulda Beyers; Nico C Gey van Pittius; Paul D van Helden; Robin M Warren Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-06-09 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Judith R Glynn; Malcolm D Yates; Amelia C Crampin; Bagrey M Ngwira; Frank D Mwaungulu; Gillian F Black; Steven D Chaguluka; Donex T Mwafulirwa; Sian Floyd; Caroline Murphy; Francis A Drobniewski; Paul E M Fine Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2004-08-03 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Tami D Lieberman; Douglas Wilson; Reshma Misra; Lealia L Xiong; Prashini Moodley; Ted Cohen; Roy Kishony Journal: Nat Med Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Sanghyuk S Shin; Chawangwa Modongo; Yeonsoo Baik; Christopher Allender; Darrin Lemmer; Rebecca E Colman; David M Engelthaler; Robin M Warren; Nicola M Zetola Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Ted Cohen; Leonid Chindelevitch; Reshma Misra; Maria E Kempner; Jerome Galea; Prashini Moodley; Douglas Wilson Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Willy Ssengooba; Frank G Cobelens; Lydia Nakiyingi; Gerald Mboowa; Derek T Armstrong; Yukari C Manabe; Moses L Joloba; Bouke C de Jong Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 3.240