PURPOSE: Recalibration and determining discriminative power, internationally, of the existing delirium prediction model (PRE-DELIRIC) for intensive care patients. METHODS: A prospective multicenter cohort study was performed in eight intensive care units (ICUs) in six countries. The ten predictors (age, APACHE-II, urgent and admission category, infection, coma, sedation, morphine use, urea level, metabolic acidosis) were collected within 24 h after ICU admission. The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) was used to identify ICU delirium. CAM-ICU screening compliance and inter-rater reliability measurements were used to secure the quality of the data. RESULTS: A total of 2,852 adult ICU patients were screened of which 1,824 (64%) were eligible for the study. Main reasons for exclusion were length of stay <1 day (19.1%) and sustained coma (4.1%). CAM-ICU compliance was mean (SD) 82 ± 16% and inter-rater reliability 0.87 ± 0.17. The median delirium incidence was 22.5% (IQR 12.8-36.6%). Although the incidence of all ten predictors differed significantly between centers, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of the eight participating centers remained good: 0.77 (95% CI 0.74-0.79). The linear predictor and intercept of the prediction rule were adjusted and resulted in improved re-calibration of the PRE-DELIRIC model. CONCLUSIONS: In this multinational study, we recalibrated the PRE-DELIRIC model. Despite differences in the incidence of predictors between the centers in the different countries, the performance of the PRE-DELIRIC-model remained good. Following validation of the PRE-DELIRIC model, it may facilitate implementation of strategies to prevent delirium and aid improvements in delirium management of ICU patients.
PURPOSE: Recalibration and determining discriminative power, internationally, of the existing delirium prediction model (PRE-DELIRIC) for intensive care patients. METHODS: A prospective multicenter cohort study was performed in eight intensive care units (ICUs) in six countries. The ten predictors (age, APACHE-II, urgent and admission category, infection, coma, sedation, morphine use, urea level, metabolic acidosis) were collected within 24 h after ICU admission. The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) was used to identify ICU delirium. CAM-ICU screening compliance and inter-rater reliability measurements were used to secure the quality of the data. RESULTS: A total of 2,852 adult ICU patients were screened of which 1,824 (64%) were eligible for the study. Main reasons for exclusion were length of stay <1 day (19.1%) and sustained coma (4.1%). CAM-ICU compliance was mean (SD) 82 ± 16% and inter-rater reliability 0.87 ± 0.17. The median delirium incidence was 22.5% (IQR 12.8-36.6%). Although the incidence of all ten predictors differed significantly between centers, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of the eight participating centers remained good: 0.77 (95% CI 0.74-0.79). The linear predictor and intercept of the prediction rule were adjusted and resulted in improved re-calibration of the PRE-DELIRIC model. CONCLUSIONS: In this multinational study, we recalibrated the PRE-DELIRIC model. Despite differences in the incidence of predictors between the centers in the different countries, the performance of the PRE-DELIRIC-model remained good. Following validation of the PRE-DELIRIC model, it may facilitate implementation of strategies to prevent delirium and aid improvements in delirium management of ICU patients.
Authors: John W Devlin; Gilles L Fraser; Aaron M Joffe; Richard R Riker; Yoanna Skrobik Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Timothy D Girard; James C Jackson; Pratik P Pandharipande; Brenda T Pun; Jennifer L Thompson; Ayumi K Shintani; Sharon M Gordon; Angelo E Canonico; Robert S Dittus; Gordon R Bernard; E Wesley Ely Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Maarten M van Eijk; Mark van den Boogaard; Rob J van Marum; Paul Benner; Piet Eikelenboom; Marina L Honing; Ben van der Hoven; Janneke Horn; Gerbrand J Izaks; Annette Kalf; Attila Karakus; Ine A Klijn; Michael A Kuiper; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Tjarda de Man; Roos C van der Mast; Robert-Jan Osse; Sophia E de Rooij; Peter E Spronk; Peter H van der Voort; Willem A van Gool; Arjen J Slooter Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: E W Ely; S K Inouye; G R Bernard; S Gordon; J Francis; L May; B Truman; T Speroff; S Gautam; R Margolin; R P Hart; R Dittus Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-12-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: S K Inouye; S T Bogardus; P A Charpentier; L Leo-Summers; D Acampora; T R Holford; L M Cooney Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-03-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Pratik P Pandharipande; Brenda T Pun; Daniel L Herr; Mervyn Maze; Timothy D Girard; Russell R Miller; Ayumi K Shintani; Jennifer L Thompson; James C Jackson; Stephen A Deppen; Renee A Stiles; Robert S Dittus; Gordon R Bernard; E Wesley Ely Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-12-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Matthias Haenggi; Sina Blum; Ruth Brechbuehl; Anna Brunello; Stephan M Jakob; Jukka Takala Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: M van den Boogaard; P Pickkers; A J C Slooter; M A Kuiper; P E Spronk; P H J van der Voort; J G van der Hoeven; R Donders; T van Achterberg; L Schoonhoven Journal: BMJ Date: 2012-02-09
Authors: Elizabeth Colantuoni; Mounica Koneru; Narjes Akhlaghi; Ximin Li; Mohamed D Hashem; Victor D Dinglas; Karin J Neufeld; Michael O Harhay; Dale M Needham Journal: Trials Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Mark van den Boogaard; Arjen J C Slooter; Roger J M Brüggemann; Lisette Schoonhoven; Albertus Beishuizen; J Wytze Vermeijden; Danie Pretorius; Jan de Koning; Koen S Simons; Paul J W Dennesen; Peter H J Van der Voort; Saskia Houterman; J G van der Hoeven; Peter Pickkers; Anna Besselink; Lieuwe S Hofstra; Peter E Spronk; Walter van den Bergh; Dirk W Donker; Malaika Fuchs; Attila Karakus; M Koeman; Mirella van Duijnhoven; Gerjon Hannink Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Annachiara Marra; Pratik P Pandharipande; Matthew S Shotwell; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Timothy D Girard; Ayumi K Shintani; Linda M Peelen; Karl G M Moons; Robert S Dittus; E Wesley Ely; Eduard E Vasilevskis Journal: Chest Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 9.410