Literature DB >> 24439937

Implementing a prospective study of women seeking abortion in the United States: understanding and overcoming barriers to recruitment.

Loren M Dobkin1, Heather Gould2, Rana E Barar3, Michaela Ferrari2, Elisette I Weiss2, Diana Greene Foster2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Turnaway Study is designed to prospectively study the outcomes of women who sought-but did not all obtain-abortions. This design permits more accurate inferences about the health consequences of abortion for women, but requires the recruitment of a large number of women from remote health care facilities to a study a sensitive topic. This paper explores the Turnaway Study's recruitment process.
METHODS: From 2008 to 2010, the staff at 30 abortion-providing facilities recruited eligible female patients. Eight interventions were evaluated using multilevel logistic regression for their impact on eligible patients being approached, approached patients agreeing to go through informed consent by phone, and enrolled patients completing the baseline interview.
FINDINGS: After site visits, patients had roughly twice the odds of being approached by facility staff and twice the odds of then agreeing to go through informed consent. When all recruitment steps were considered together, the net effect of site visits was to increase the odds that eligible patients participated by nearly a factor of six. After the introduction of a patient gift card incentive, patients had over three times the odds of agreeing to go through informed consent. With each passing month, however, staff demonstrated a 9% reduced odds of approaching eligible patients about the study.
CONCLUSION: Prioritizing scientific rigor over the convenience of using existing datasets, the Turnaway Study confronted recruitment challenges common to medical practice-based studies and unique to sensitive services. Visiting sites and communicating frequently with facility staff, as well as offering incentives to patients to hear more about the study before informed consent, may help to increase participation in prospective health studies and facilitate evaluation of sensitive women's health services.
Copyright © 2014 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24439937     DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  16 in total

1.  Stability of Retrospective Pregnancy Intention Reporting Among Women with Unwanted Pregnancies in the United States.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Mark R Wilson; Minjeong Jeon; Diana G Foster
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-11

2.  Comparison of Health, Development, Maternal Bonding, and Poverty Among Children Born After Denial of Abortion vs After Pregnancies Subsequent to an Abortion.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; M Antonia Biggs; Sarah Raifman; Jessica Gipson; Katrina Kimport; Corinne H Rocca
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 16.193

3.  Receiving Versus Being Denied a Pregnancy Termination and Subsequent Alcohol Use: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Kevin Delucchi; Sharon C Wilsnack; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.826

4.  Mental Health Diagnoses 3 Years After Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion in the United States.

Authors:  M Antonia Biggs; John M Neuhaus; Diana G Foster
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Alcohol use before and during unwanted pregnancy.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Sharon C Wilsnack; Diana Greene Foster; Kevin L Delucchi
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Moderators and mediators of the relationship between receiving versus being denied a pregnancy termination and subsequent binge drinking.

Authors:  S C M Roberts; M S Subbaraman; K L Delucchi; S C Wilsnack; D G Foster
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Which women are missed by primary health-care based interventions for alcohol and drug use?

Authors:  S C M Roberts; L J Ralph; S C Wilsnack; D G Foster
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Receiving versus being denied an abortion and subsequent tobacco use.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-03

9.  Decision Rightness and Emotional Responses to Abortion in the United States: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Katrina Kimport; Sarah C M Roberts; Heather Gould; John Neuhaus; Diana G Foster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effect of abortion on having and achieving aspirational one-year plans.

Authors:  Ushma D Upadhyay; M Antonia Biggs; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.