Literature DB >> 24439318

Morphologic evaluation of ruptured and symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm by three-dimensional modeling.

An Tang1, Claude Kauffmann2, Sophie Tremblay-Paquet3, Stéphane Elkouri4, Oren Steinmetz5, Florence Morin-Roy3, Laurie Cloutier-Gill3, Gilles Soulez6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify geometric indices of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) on computed tomography that are associated with higher risk of rupture.
METHODS: This retrospective case-control, institutional review board-approved study involved 63 cases with ruptured or symptomatic AAA and 94 controls with asymptomatic AAA. Three-dimensional models were generated from computed tomography segmentation and used for the calculation of 27 geometric indices. On the basis of the results of univariate analysis and multivariable sequential logistic regression analyses with a forward stepwise model selection based on likelihood ratios, a traditional model based on gender and maximal diameter (Dmax) was compared with a model that also incorporated geometric indices while adjusting for gender and Dmax. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for these two models to evaluate their classification accuracy.
RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that gender (P = .024), Dmax (P = .001), and 14 other geometric indices were associated with AAA rupture at P < .05. In the multivariable analysis, adjusting for gender and Dmax, the AAA with a higher bulge location (P = .020) and lower mean averaged area (P = .005) were associated with AAA rupture. With these two geometric indices, the area under the ROC curve showed an improvement from 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.77) to 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.83; P < .001). Our predictive model showed comparable sensitivity (64% vs 60%) and specificity (79% vs 77%) with current treatment criteria based on gender and diameter at the point optimizing the Youden index (sensitivity + specificity - 1) on the ROC curve.
CONCLUSIONS: Two geometric indices derived from AAA three-dimensional modeling were independently associated with AAA rupture. The addition of these indices in a predictive model based on current treatment criteria modestly improved the accuracy to detect aneurysm rupture.
Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24439318     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  5 in total

1.  Wall Stress and Geometry Measures in Electively Repaired Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Balaji Rengarajan; Mirunalini Thirugnanasambandam; Shalin Parikh; Raymond Gomez; Victor De Oliveira; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  A Comparative Classification Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms by Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Balaji Rengarajan; Wei Wu; Crystal Wiedner; Daijin Ko; Satish C Muluk; Mark K Eskandari; Prahlad G Menon; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  The Association Between Geometry and Wall Stress in Emergently Repaired Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Sathyajeeth S Chauhan; Carlos A Gutierrez; Mirunalini Thirugnanasambandam; Victor De Oliveira; Satish C Muluk; Mark K Eskandari; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Decision Tree Based Classification of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Geometry Quantification Measures.

Authors:  Shalin A Parikh; Raymond Gomez; Mirunalini Thirugnanasambandam; Sathyajeeth S Chauhan; Victor De Oliveira; Satish C Muluk; Mark K Eskandari; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  An association of spleen volume and aortic diameter in patients and in mice with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Fang-Da Li; Rui Kang; Hao Nie; Xi-Ming Wang; Yue-Hong Zheng
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.