Literature DB >> 24437587

Effects of nasal port area on perception of nasality and measures of nasalance based on computational modeling.

Kate Bunton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relation between nasal port area, nasalance, and perceptual ratings of nasality for three English corner vowels, /i/, /u/, and /a/.
DESIGN: Samples were simulated using a computational model that allowed for exact control of nasal port size and direct measures of nasalance. Perceptual ratings were obtained using a paired stimulus presentation. PARTICIPANTS: Four experienced listeners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nasalance and perceptual ratings of nasality.
RESULTS: Findings show that perceptual ratings of nasality and nasalance increased for samples generated with nasal port areas up to and including 0.16 cm(2) but plateaued in samples generated with larger nasal port areas. No vowel differences were noted for perceptual ratings.
CONCLUSIONS: This work extends previously published work by including nasal port areas representative of those reported in the literature for clinical populations. Continued work using samples with varied phonetic context and varying suprasegmental and temporal characteristics are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nasal port area; nasalance; nasality; velopharyngeal function

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24437587      PMCID: PMC4440335          DOI: 10.1597/13-126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  13 in total

1.  Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment.

Authors:  R M Dalston; D W Warren; E T Dalston
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1991-04

2.  The relationship between nasalance scores and nasality ratings obtained with equal appearing interval and direct magnitude estimation scaling methods.

Authors:  Tami U Brancamp; Kerry E Lewis; Thomas Watterson
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2010-03-09

3.  Open source software for experiment design and control.

Authors:  James M Hillenbrand; Robert T Gayvert
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-based vocal tract area functions obtained from the same speaker in 1994 and 2002.

Authors:  Brad H Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Phonetic elements and perception of nasality.

Authors:  L B LINTZ; D SHERMAN
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1961-12

6.  Screening of velopharyngeal closure based on nasal airflow rate measurements.

Authors:  T Laine; D W Warren; R M Dalston; K E Morr
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1988-07

7.  Structural correlates of nasality.

Authors:  P J Carney; H L Morris
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1971-07

8.  The relationship between nasalance and nasality in children with cleft palate.

Authors:  T Watterson; S C McFarlane; D S Wright
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Perci: a method for rating palatal efficiency.

Authors:  D W Warren
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1979-07

10.  The relation of nasality and nasalance to nasal port area based on a computational model.

Authors:  Kate Bunton; Brad H Story
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-10-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of velopharyngeal openings on flow characteristics of nasal emission.

Authors:  Elias Sundström; Suzanne Boyce; Liran Oren
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-01-10

2.  Change in aeroacoustic sound mechanism during sibilant sound with different velopharyngeal opening sizes.

Authors:  Elias Sundström; Liran Oren
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.079

3.  Numerical investigation of effects of tongue articulation and velopharyngeal closure on the production of sibilant [s].

Authors:  HsuehJui Lu; Tsukasa Yoshinaga; ChungGang Li; Kazunori Nozaki; Akiyoshi Iida; Makoto Tsubokura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.