Literature DB >> 2069975

Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment.

R M Dalston1, D W Warren, E T Dalston.   

Abstract

A series of 117 patients were studied in an attempt to determine the extent to which acoustic assessments of speech made with a Kay Elemetrics Nasometer corresponded with aerodynamic estimates of velopharyngeal area and clinical judgments of hypernasality. Nasometer data were obtained while patients read or repeated a standardized passage with no nasal consonants. Pressure-flow data were obtained from 96 of these patients during repeated productions of the word "papa." Listener judgments were made in a clinical setting by the senior author using a 6-point equal-appearing interval scale. Nasometer and pressure-flow results were not known to the senior author when making listener assessments. With a cutoff nasalance score of 32, the sensitivity of Nasometer ratings in correctly identifying the presence or absence of velopharyngeal areas in excess of 0.10 cm2 was 0.78 and 0.79, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of nasometry in correctly identifying subjects with more than mild hypernasality in their speech was 0.89 while the specificity was 0.95. The results suggest that the Nasometer is an appropriate instrument that can be of value in assessing patients suspected of having velopharyngeal impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2069975     DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1991_028_0184_uonaad_2.3.co_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  11 in total

1.  A simple technique for determining velopharyngeal status during speech production.

Authors:  Kate Bunton; Jeannette D Hoit; Keegan Gallagher
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.761

2.  Effects of velopharyngeal openings on flow characteristics of nasal emission.

Authors:  Elias Sundström; Suzanne Boyce; Liran Oren
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-01-10

3.  Effects of Biofeedback on Control and Generalization of Nasalization in Typical Speakers.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Joseph O Mendoza; Simone V Gill; Joseph S Perkell; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  [Hyperrhinophonia and craniofacial structure. A cephalometric analysis].

Authors:  A Stellzig; G Komposch
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1994-08

5.  [The nasometer. An instrument for the objective study of hyperrhinophonia in cheilognathopalatoschisis patients].

Authors:  A Stellzig; W Heppt; G Komposch
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1994-08

6.  The relation of nasality and nasalance to nasal port area based on a computational model.

Authors:  Kate Bunton; Brad H Story
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-10-04

7.  Effects of nasal port area on perception of nasality and measures of nasalance based on computational modeling.

Authors:  Kate Bunton
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2015-01

8.  Objective Assessment of Hypernasality in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate with the NasalView System: A Clinical Validation Study.

Authors:  Kai Wermker; Susanne Jung; Ulrich Joos; Johannes Kleinheinz
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-12

9.  Comparison of videonasoendoscopy and auditory-perceptual evaluation of speech in individuals with cleft lip/palate.

Authors:  Lauren Medeiros Paniagua; Alana Verza Signorini; Sady Selaimen da Costa; Marcus Vinicius Martins Collares; Sílvia Dornelles
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-07

10.  A ringed fascia lata graft without peritendinous areolar tissue encircling the levator veli palatini and superior pharyngeal constrictor muscles gradually shrinks to reduce velopharyngeal incompetence, functioning as an intravelar palatal lift.

Authors:  Kenya Fujita; Kiyoshi Matsuo; Shunsuke Yuzuriha
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.