Literature DB >> 2293737

Craniofacial onlay bone grafting: a prospective evaluation of graft morphology, orientation, and embryonic origin.

R A Hardesty1, J L Marsh.   

Abstract

A prospective study using 46 young adult New Zealand rabbits was designed to evaluate onlay bone grafts to the craniofacial skeleton with respect to embryonic origin (membranous or endochondral), gross morphology (unicortical or bicortical), and orientation (cortex-to-bed relationship). Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed and contrasted at both periods of evaluation (1.5 and 3.0 months). The embryonic origin of onlay bone grafts to the rabbit snout is significantly correlated with graft surface area, volume, weight, and recipient bed union for up to 3 months postoperatively. Over this interval, membranous bone (calvaria) grafts either persist in their entirety or increase, whereas endochondral bone (iliac) grafts resorb. Neither the number of cortices (unicortical or bicortical) nor the orientation of unicortical grafts (cortex-to-bed relationship) affected graft fate regardless of embryonic origin. Bone density remained unaltered during both resorption and deposition. Osteogenesis, demonstrated by serial fluorochrome markers, occurs in both membranous and endochondral bone grafts. Histologically, bone grafts of membranous and endochondral origin differ greatly in their cortical to cancellous diploe ratios and architectural configuration. We hypothesize that the differences found are related to the three-dimensional osseous architecture rather than to the embryonic origin of bone per se.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2293737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  14 in total

1.  Craniofacial Bone Grafting: Wolff's Law Revisited.

Authors:  Adam J Oppenheimer; Lawrence Tong; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2008-11

Review 2.  [Regeneration instead of reparation: a critical review of the autogenous bone transplant as "golden standard" of reconstructive oral surgery].

Authors:  Hans-Henning Horch; Christoph Pautke
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-07

3.  The matrix of endochondral bone differs from the matrix of intramembranous bone.

Authors:  C K Scott; J A Hightower
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Evolving concepts in the pre-operative management and surgical treatment of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  P C Francel; J A Persing
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Onlay bone grafts in head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Sukru Yazar
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  [Use of a fibula bone span in alveolar ridge augmentation. Outcome after 2 years].

Authors:  R Bschorer; R Schmelzle
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1997-09

7.  Adult rat bones maintain distinct regionalized expression of markers associated with their development.

Authors:  Simon C F Rawlinson; Ian J McKay; Mandeep Ghuman; Claudia Wellmann; Paul Ryan; Saengsome Prajaneh; Gul Zaman; Francis J Hughes; Virginia J Kingsmill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The thickness of parietal bones in a new zealand sample of cadaveric skulls in relation to calvarial bone graft.

Authors:  Han J Choi; Rohana K De Silva; Darryl C Tong; Harsha L De Silva; Robert M Love; Josie Athens
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-05-09

9.  [Reconstruction of the frontal sinus with a calvarium split galea periosteum transplant after inflammatory complications].

Authors:  T Grundmann; W Kehrl
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Use of anteriolateral wall of maxilla for reconstruction of orbital floor fracture: A clinical study.

Authors:  Anshul Rai; Abhay Datarkar
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.