Literature DB >> 24436742

Utility of stereolithographic models in osteocutaneous free flap reconstruction of the head and neck.

L Morris1, Mofiyinfolu Sokoya1, Larry Cunningham2, Thomas J Gal1.   

Abstract

Background Stereolithographic (SLA) models have become a valuable resource in preoperative planning in maxillofacial reconstruction. The objective of this study was to perform a defect specific analysis of the utility of SLA models. The goal was to determine the manner in which the perceived benefit of preoperative modeling translates to measurable clinical advantages. Methods Patients who underwent reconstruction of defects of the mandible or midface using SLA modeling between 2006 and 2011 were identified through billing records. Based on the nature and extent of bony defect, cases requiring nearly identical reconstruction, but without modeling, were matched case by case for comparison. Given the presumed efficiency of SLA modeling, a comparison of total and reconstructive operative times was performed to see if this could offset the cost of the model. Results There were 10 patients each in the "model" and "nonmodel" group. No significant differences were observed for total operative time between groups. Surprisingly, the total reconstructive time was lower in the group not using SLA models (p = 0.05). Conclusions SLA models provide several operative planning advantages, but did not appear to decrease operative time enough to sufficiently offset the cost of the model in this group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  free flap; head and neck reconstruction; stereolithography

Year:  2013        PMID: 24436742      PMCID: PMC3721014          DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1343787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  7 in total

1.  Use of a stereolithography model for accurate, preoperative adaptation of a reconstruction plate.

Authors:  B T Kernan; J A Wimsatt
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Use of virtual surgery and stereolithography-guided osteotomy for mandibular reconstruction with the free fibula.

Authors:  Anuja K Antony; Wei F Chen; Antonia Kolokythas; Katherine A Weimer; Mimis N Cohen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Stereolithographic modeling in reconstructive surgery of the craniofacial skeleton after tumor resection.

Authors:  Karan Chopra; Brian R Gastman; Paul N Manson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Stereolithographic modeling technology applied to tumor resection.

Authors:  Larry L Cunningham; Matthew J Madsen; Gilman Peterson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Use of 3-d stereolithographic models in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Pushkar Mehra; Jeremey Miner; Richard D'Innocenzo; Mohammed Nadershah
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-03-04

6.  The usefulness of stereomodels in maxillofacial surgical management.

Authors:  Lop Keung Chow; Lim Kwong Cheung
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Factors associated with complications in microvascular reconstruction of head and neck defects.

Authors:  B Singh; P G Cordeiro; E Santamaria; A R Shaha; D G Pfister; J P Shah
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.730

  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in head and neck cancer reconstruction.

Authors:  Prabha Yadav
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2014-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.