Literature DB >> 22030490

Use of virtual surgery and stereolithography-guided osteotomy for mandibular reconstruction with the free fibula.

Anuja K Antony1, Wei F Chen, Antonia Kolokythas, Katherine A Weimer, Mimis N Cohen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Fibular osteotomy remains a challenging aspect of mandibular microsurgical reconstruction, dependent largely on surgeon experience, intraoperative judgment, and technical speed. Virtual surgical planning and stereolithographic modeling is a relatively new technique that can allow for reduction in the learning curve associated with neomandible contouring, enhanced levels of accuracy, and acceleration of a time-consuming intraoperative step. The authors present a video (narrated and edited from planning sessions and intraoperative use of technique to illustrate the technology) and describe their favorable results. Five patients underwent composite resection of the mandible and free fibula osteocutaneous reconstruction over a 6-month period (December of 2009 to June of 2010) at a single institution using a virtual planning session and stereolithographic modeling. Outcomes assessed included technical accuracy, aesthetic contour, and functional outcomes. All patients achieved negative margins with cutting guide-directed resection. Use of this technique eliminated the need for intraoperative measurement and yielded fibular segments with excellent apposition and faithful duplication of the preoperative plan. Minimal adjustments were needed for inset. Flap survival was 100 percent. All patients have maintained preoperative occlusion and a symmetric mandibular contour on Panorex study, three-dimensional computed tomography, and clinical examination. Accuracy of the reconstructed contour was confirmed using computed tomographic image overlay. This virtual surgical planning technique combined with stereolithographic model-guided osteotomy is the mainstay of the authors' approach to fibular osteotomy when dealing with patients requiring mandibular reconstruction. The authors feel this technology facilitates realization of technical accuracy, aesthetic contour, and functional outcomes and may be particularly useful if free fibular mandibular reconstruction is performed less frequently. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22030490     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  33 in total

1.  Preliminary development of a workstation for craniomaxillofacial surgical procedures: introducing a computer-assisted planning and execution system.

Authors:  Chad R Gordon; Ryan J Murphy; Devin Coon; Ehsan Basafa; Yoshito Otake; Mohammed Al Rakan; Erin Rada; Srinivas Susarla; Sriniras Susarla; Edward Swanson; Elliot Fishman; Gabriel Santiago; Gerald Brandacher; Peter Liacouras; Gerald Grant; Mehran Armand
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Oral Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Young-Hoon Joo; Jae-Keun Cho; Bon Seok Koo; Minsu Kwon; Seong Keun Kwon; Soon Young Kwon; Min-Su Kim; Jeong Kyu Kim; Heejin Kim; Innchul Nam; Jong-Lyel Roh; Young Min Park; Il-Seok Park; Jung Je Park; Sung-Chan Shin; Soon-Hyun Ahn; Seongjun Won; Chang Hwan Ryu; Tae Mi Yoon; Giljoon Lee; Doh Young Lee; Myung-Chul Lee; Joon Kyoo Lee; Jin Choon Lee; Jae-Yol Lim; Jae Won Chang; Jeon Yeob Jang; Man Ki Chung; Yuh-Seok Jung; Jae-Gu Cho; Yoon Seok Choi; Jeong-Seok Choi; Guk Haeng Lee; Phil-Sang Chung
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.372

3.  Virtual surgical planning in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Harvey Chim; Nicholas Wetjen; Samir Mardini
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Reconstruction of the maxilla using a fibula graft and virtual planning techniques.

Authors:  Kristian Rude; Torben H Thygesen; Jens Ahm Sørensen
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-05-14

5.  Comparison of intraoperative time measurements between osseous reconstructions with free fibula flaps applying computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured and conventional techniques.

Authors:  Jan Rustemeyer; Aynur Sari-Rieger; Alex Melenberg; Alexander Busch
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-12

6.  Utility of stereolithographic models in osteocutaneous free flap reconstruction of the head and neck.

Authors:  L Morris; Mofiyinfolu Sokoya; Larry Cunningham; Thomas J Gal
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-04-30

7.  Computer-assisted versus traditional freehand technique in fibular free flap mandibular reconstruction: a morphological comparative study.

Authors:  Thibault De Maesschalck; Delphine S Courvoisier; Paolo Scolozzi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Designing patient-specific 3D printed craniofacial implants using a novel topology optimization method.

Authors:  Alok Sutradhar; Jaejong Park; Diana Carrau; Tam H Nguyen; Michael J Miller; Glaucio H Paulino
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Virtual Surgical Planning for the Management of Severe Atrophic Mandible Fractures.

Authors:  Jaime Castro-Núñez; Jared M Shelton; Susan Snyder; Joseph Van Sickels
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-04-19

10.  Free microsurgical and pedicled flaps for oncological mandibular reconstruction: technical aspects and evaluation of patient comorbidities.

Authors:  Victor J Hassid; Suhair Maqusi; Emmett Culligan; Mimis N Cohen; Anuja K Antony
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2012-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.