| Literature DB >> 24436726 |
Stuart Batterman1, Liuliu Du1, Edith Parker2, Thomas Robins1, Toby Lewis3, Bhramar Mukherjee1, Erminia Ramirez4, Zachary Rowe5, Wilma Brakefield-Caldwell1.
Abstract
This study characterizes the use of HEPA air filters provided to 89 households participating in an intervention study investigating the respiratory health of children with asthma. Freestanding filters were placed in the child's bedroom and monitored continuously for nearly a year in each household. Filter use was significantly affected by study phase, season and monitoring week. During the "intensive" weeks when a community education worker and a field technician visited the household, the use rate averaged 70±33%. During season-long "non-intensive" periods between seasonal visits, use dropped to 34±30%. Filter use rapidly decreased during the 3 to 4 weeks following each intensive, was slightly higher in spring, summer, and in the evening and at night when the child was likely to be home, although households did not follow consistent diurnal patterns. While participants expressed an understanding of the benefits of filter use and reported good experiences with them, use rates were low, particularly during unobserved non-intensive periods. The provision of freestanding air filters to individuals or households must be considered an active intervention that requires monitoring and evaluation, otherwise unknown and unexpected patterns of filter use may alter and possibly bias results due to exposure misclassification.Entities:
Keywords: Air quality; HEPA; behavior; exposure misclassification; indoor environment; intervention
Year: 2013 PMID: 24436726 PMCID: PMC3889137 DOI: 10.1007/s11869-013-0216-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Air Qual Atmos Health ISSN: 1873-9318 Impact factor: 3.763