| Literature DB >> 34288127 |
Anne M Riederer1, Jennifer E Krenz1, Maria I Tchong-French1, Elizabeth Torres2, Adriana Perez3, Lisa R Younglove1, Karen L Jansen1, David C Hardie1, Stephanie A Farquhar1, Paul D Sampson4, Nervana Metwali5, Peter S Thorne5, Catherine J Karr1,6.
Abstract
We conducted a randomized trial of portable HEPA air cleaners in the homes of children age 6-12 years with asthma in the Yakima Valley, Washington. All families received asthma education while intervention families also received two HEPA cleaners (child's bedroom, living room). We collected 14-day integrated samples of endotoxin in settled dust and PM10 and PM10-2.5 in the air of the children's bedrooms at baseline and one-year follow-up, and used linear regression to compare follow-up levels, adjusting for baseline. Seventy-one families (36 HEPA, 35 control) completed the study. Baseline geometric mean (GSD) endotoxin loadings were 1565 (6.3) EU/m2 and 2110 (4.9) EU/m2 , respectively, in HEPA vs. control homes while PM10 and PM10-2.5 were 22.5 (1.9) μg/m3 and 9.5 (2.9) μg/m3 , respectively, in HEPA homes, and 19.8 (1.8) μg/m3 and 7.7 (2.0) μg/m3 , respectively, in control homes. At follow-up, HEPA families had 46% lower (95% CI, 31%-57%) PM10 on average than control families, consistent with prior studies. In the best-fit heterogeneous slopes model, HEPA families had 49% (95% CI, 6%-110%) and 89% lower (95% CI, 28%-177%) PM10-2.5 at follow-up, respectively, at 50th and 75th percentile baseline concentrations. Endotoxin loadings did not differ significantly at follow-up (4% lower, HEPA homes; 95% CI, -87% to 50%).Entities:
Keywords: HEPA cleaners; asthma; children; coarse PM; endotoxin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34288127 PMCID: PMC8577577 DOI: 10.1111/ina.12858
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indoor Air ISSN: 0905-6947 Impact factor: 5.770