Literature DB >> 24436614

Percutaneous Hemodynamic Support (Impella) in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure and/or Cardiogenic Shock Not Eligible to PROTECT II Trial.

Wei Liu1, Venkata Kishore Mukku2, Syed Gilani2, Ken Fujise2, Alejandro Barbagelata2.   

Abstract

PROTECT I and II trials have tested the efficacy of Impella in patents with high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, patients with severe hemodynamic instability such as cardiac arrest, ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), or cardiogenic shock were excluded. The objective was to investigate the efficacy of Impella in sicker patient population who were not included in PROTECT trials. These patients merit high-risk PCI who had cardiogenic shock and unstable or decompensated heart failure (HF). From December 2010 to March 2012, 10 consecutive patients with extremely high surgical risk and hemodynamic instability underwent urgent PCI with Impella 2.5 support (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA). These patients were presented with advance HF and/or cardiogenic shock. Among the 10 included patients, 3 patients were with cardiac arrest and 1 patient was with acute myocardial infarction. All patients had successful Impella implantation and remained hemodynamically stable during high-risk PCI. Among the 10 patients 2 patients (20%) died within 1 month and 1 patient developed limb ischemia. In high-risk population nonrandomizable to PROTECT trials with advance HF/cardiogenic shock, Impella could be an important tool for hemodynamic support to PCI or could be a bridge to left ventricle assist device to achieve good recovery. Larger studies need to be conducted on this high-risk population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiogenic shock; heart failure; left ventricle assisting device; percutaneous coronary intervention

Year:  2013        PMID: 24436614      PMCID: PMC3830570          DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1349167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Angiol        ISSN: 1061-1711


  20 in total

1.  Role of Impella 2.5 heart pump in stabilizing diastolic aortic pressure to avert acute hemodynamic collapse during coronary interventions.

Authors:  Neeraj Jolly
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.022

2.  The Impella 2.5 and 5.0 devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with severe and profound cardiogenic shock: the Academic Medical Center intensive care unit experience.

Authors:  Annemarie E Engström; Ricardo Cocchieri; Antoine H Driessen; Krischan D Sjauw; Marije M Vis; Jan Baan; Mark de Jong; Wim K Lagrand; Jos A P van der Sloot; Jan G Tijssen; Robbert J de Winter; Bas A S de Mol; Jan J Piek; José P J M Henriques
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study.

Authors:  William W O'Neill; Neal S Kleiman; Jeffrey Moses; Jose P S Henriques; Simon Dixon; Joseph Massaro; Igor Palacios; Brijeshwar Maini; Suresh Mulukutla; Vladimír Dzavík; Jeffrey Popma; Pamela S Douglas; Magnus Ohman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  The Impella Recover 2.5 and TandemHeart ventricular assist devices are safe and associated with equivalent clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jason C Kovacic; Huy T Nguyen; Rucha Karajgikar; Samin K Sharma; Annapoorna S Kini
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5.

Authors:  José P S Henriques; Maurice Remmelink; Jan Baan; René J van der Schaaf; Marije M Vis; Karel T Koch; Evert W Scholten; Bas A J M de Mol; Jan G P Tijssen; Jan J Piek; Robbert J de Winter
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Cardiogenic shock secondary to severe acute ischemic mitral regurgitation managed with an Impella 2.5 percutaneous left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Laura Harmon; Fernando Boccalandro
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Feasibility and long-term safety of elective Impella-assisted high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot two-centre study.

Authors:  Francesco Burzotta; Leonardo Paloscia; Carlo Trani; Marco Mascellanti; Rocco Mongiardo; Guido Materazzo; Giampaolo Niccoli; Massimo Di Marco; Antonio Maria Leone; Italo Porto; Mario Attilio Mazzari; Antonio Giuseppe Rebuzzi; Giovanni Schiavoni; Filippo Crea
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.160

8.  A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience.

Authors:  Simon R Dixon; José P S Henriques; Laura Mauri; Krischan Sjauw; Andrew Civitello; Biswajit Kar; Pranav Loyalka; Frederic S Resnic; Paul Teirstein; Raj Makkar; Igor F Palacios; Michael Collins; Jeffrey Moses; Karim Benali; William W O'Neill
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  The Impella LP 5.0 as a bridge to long-term circulatory support.

Authors:  Gordan Samoukovic; Cristian Rosu; Nadia Giannetti; Renzo Cecere
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-03-02

10.  Combined use of Impella device and intra-aortic balloon pump to improve survival in a patient in profound cardiogenic shock post cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Anjan Gupta; Suhail Allaqaband; Tanvir Bajwa
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Coronary artery disease : Interventional and operative therapeutic options after cardiac arrest].

Authors:  M Behnes; K Mashayekhi; M Borggrefe; I Akin
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Tamara Ni hIci; Henry Mp Boardman; Kamran Baig; Jody L Stafford; Cristina Cernei; Owen Bodger; Stephen Westaby
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.