PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of (68)Ga-DOTATOC positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan in patients with suspected pulmonary carcinoid tumour and to compare its results with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT scan. METHODS: In this prospective study, 32 patients (age 34.22 ± 12.03 years; 53.1 % female) with clinical suspicion of bronchopulmonary carcinoid were evaluated with (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The two imaging modalities were compared, considering the tissue diagnosis as the reference standard. RESULTS: Based on the reference standard 26 cases were carcinoid tumours [21 typical carcinoids (TC) and 5 atypical carcinoids (AC)] and 6 cases were non-carcinoid tumours. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary carcinoid tumour were 96.15, 100 and 96.87 % respectively, whereas those of (18)F-FDG PET/CT were 78.26, 11.1 and 59.37 % respectively. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUV max) of TC on (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scan ranged from 3.58 to 55, while that of AC ranged from 1.1 to 32.5. (18)F-FDG PET/CT was true-positive in all cases of AC and false-negative in eight cases of TC (sensitivity for TC 61.9 % and for AC 100 %). CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT is a useful imaging investigation for the evaluation of pulmonary carcinoids. (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan suffers from low sensitivity and specificity in differentiating the pulmonary carcinoids from other tumours.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of (68)Ga-DOTATOC positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan in patients with suspected pulmonary carcinoid tumour and to compare its results with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT scan. METHODS: In this prospective study, 32 patients (age 34.22 ± 12.03 years; 53.1 % female) with clinical suspicion of bronchopulmonary carcinoid were evaluated with (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The two imaging modalities were compared, considering the tissue diagnosis as the reference standard. RESULTS: Based on the reference standard 26 cases were carcinoid tumours [21 typical carcinoids (TC) and 5 atypical carcinoids (AC)] and 6 cases were non-carcinoid tumours. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary carcinoid tumour were 96.15, 100 and 96.87 % respectively, whereas those of (18)F-FDG PET/CT were 78.26, 11.1 and 59.37 % respectively. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUV max) of TC on (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scan ranged from 3.58 to 55, while that of AC ranged from 1.1 to 32.5. (18)F-FDG PET/CT was true-positive in all cases of AC and false-negative in eight cases of TC (sensitivity for TC 61.9 % and for AC 100 %). CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT is a useful imaging investigation for the evaluation of pulmonary carcinoids. (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan suffers from low sensitivity and specificity in differentiating the pulmonary carcinoids from other tumours.
Authors: Myriam Wartski; Jean-Louis Alberini; François Leroy-Ladurie; Vincent De Montpreville; Charles Nguyen; Carine Corone; Philippe Dartevelle; Alain Paul Pecking Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: Michael Gabriel; Clemens Decristoforo; Dorota Kendler; Georg Dobrozemsky; Dirk Heute; Christian Uprimny; Peter Kovacs; Elisabeth Von Guggenberg; Reto Bale; Irene J Virgolini Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Anne-Leen Deleu; Annouschka Laenen; Herbert Decaluwé; Birgit Weynand; Christophe Dooms; Walter De Wever; Sander Jentjens; Karolien Goffin; Johan Vansteenkiste; Koen Van Laere; Paul De Leyn; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Christophe M Deroose Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2022-05-07 Impact factor: 3.434