Literature DB >> 16763820

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-DOTATOC and [18F]FDG in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours scheduled for 90Y-DOTATOC therapy.

Sophia Koukouraki1, Ludwig G Strauss, Vassilios Georgoulias, Michael Eisenhut, Uwe Haberkorn, Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare, by means of dynamic PET, the pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-DOTATOC, a tracer which reflects the expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), and of [18F]FDG, a marker of tumour viability, in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) in whom 90Y-DOTATOC therapy was planned.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients (63 lesions) with confirmed metastatic NETs were enrolled in this study. Dynamic [18F]FDG and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET scans were performed on two different days in the same week. The data analysis was based on qualitative and quantitative analysis using a two-tissue compartment model with a blood compartment and a non-compartment model based on the fractal dimension (FD). Multivariate analysis was used for evaluation of the kinetic data.
RESULTS: Enhanced [18F]FDG uptake was observed in 43/63 lesions. 68Ga-DOTATOC showed pathologically enhanced uptake in all evaluated patients and in 57/63 lesions. Discordant scintigraphic results for [18F]FDG and 68Ga-DOTATOC were observed in 6/15 patients. Global SUV was defined as the SUV measured in the last frame (55-60 min p.i.) of the dynamic series, for each tracer. The median global SUV uptake was 7.9 for 68Ga-DOTATOC and 4.6 for [18F]FDG. The selection of patients for 90Y-DOTATOC therapy was based on the uptake of 68Ga-DOTATOC. Multiple linear regression analysis was applied to determine the effect of each kinetic parameter (K1-k4, VB) on the global SUV of both tracers. The highest positive t-ratio was found for K1 (receptor binding), followed by k3 (cellular internalisation) and VB (fractional blood volume), when using the global 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake (SUV) as a target variable. Analysis of the [18F]FDG data revealed the highest positive t-ratio for VB, followed by k3 (phosphorylation) and K1 (influx). The comparison of global SUV, K1-k4 and the FD for [18F]FDG and 68Ga-DOTATOC did not show any statistically significant correlation. The only parameter that demonstrated a significant linear correlation between the tracers was VB.
CONCLUSION: 68Ga-DOTATOC is a promising tool for evaluation of the expression of SSTR2 in NETs. The combination of [18F]FDG and 68Ga-DOTATOC dynamic PET studies provides different information regarding the biological properties of lesions in patients with metastatic NETs in whom 90Y-DOTATOC therapy is planned. While the global 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake is influenced mostly by K1, the global [18F]FDG uptake is mostly influenced by VB. Only patients with enhanced 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake (SUV >5.0) were referred to 90Y-DOTATOC therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16763820     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-006-0110-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  22 in total

1.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in adrenocortical carcinoma: a prospective comparison with computed tomography.

Authors:  S Leboulleux; C Dromain; G Bonniaud; A Aupérin; B Caillou; J Lumbroso; R Sigal; E Baudin; M Schlumberger
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Requirements and implementation of a flexible kinetic modeling tool.

Authors:  C Burger; A Buck
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  (F-18) fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as a predictor of pathologic grade and other prognostic variables in bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  A L Folpe; R H Lyles; J T Sprouse; E U Conrad; J F Eary
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Lung cancer proliferation correlates with [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  H Vesselle; R A Schmidt; J M Pugsley; M Li; S G Kohlmyer; E Vallires; D E Wood
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  The applications of PET in clinical oncology.

Authors:  L G Strauss; P S Conti
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Dynamic PET 18F-FDG studies in patients with primary and recurrent soft-tissue sarcomas: impact on diagnosis and correlation with grading.

Authors:  A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; L G Strauss; M Schwarzbach; C Burger; T Heichel; F Willeke; G Mechtersheimer; T Lehnert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  The role of quantitative (18)F-FDG PET studies for the differentiation of malignant and benign bone lesions.

Authors:  Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; Ludwig G Strauss; Thomas Heichel; Hua Wu; Cyrill Burger; Ludger Bernd; Volker Ewerbeck
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  FDG PET in the evaluation of the aggressiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinoma: correlation with histopathological features.

Authors:  K Higashi; Y Ueda; K Ayabe; A Sakurai; H Seki; Y Nambu; M Oguchi; H Shikata; S Taki; H Tonami; S Katsuda; I Yamamoto
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 9.  Functional imaging of endocrine tumors: role of positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Karel Pacak; Graeme Eisenhofer; David S Goldstein
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 10.  The diagnosis and medical management of advanced neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Gregory A Kaltsas; G Michael Besser; Ashley B Grossman
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 19.871

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  ⁶⁸Ga-labelled peptides for diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic NET.

Authors:  Valentina Ambrosini; Davide Campana; Paola Tomassetti; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Coordinating radiometals of copper, gallium, indium, yttrium, and zirconium for PET and SPECT imaging of disease.

Authors:  Thaddeus J Wadas; Edward H Wong; Gary R Weisman; Carolyn J Anderson
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Role of (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the evaluation of primary pulmonary carcinoids.

Authors:  Tarun Jindal; Arvind Kumar; Balasubramanian Venkitaraman; Roman Dutta; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 2.884

4.  Exploring new frontiers in molecular imaging: Emergence of Ga PET/CT.

Authors:  Eik Hock Tan; Soon Whatt Goh
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-02-28

5.  Neuroendocrine tumour of the mediastinum: fusion of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT datasets demonstrates different degrees of differentiation.

Authors:  C von Falck; A R Boerner; M Galanski; W H Knapp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Can PET-CT with FDG replace contrast enhanced CT for imaging of liver metastases?

Authors:  Ludwig G Strauss; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  What can gallium-68 PET add to receptor and molecular imaging?

Authors:  Adil Al-Nahhas; Zarni Win; Teresa Szyszko; Aviral Singh; Sameer Khan; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Conventional and Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Ectopic Cushing's Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea M Isidori; Emilia Sbardella; Maria Chiara Zatelli; Mara Boschetti; Giovanni Vitale; Annamaria Colao; Rosario Pivonello
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Role of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in initial evaluation of patients with suspected bronchopulmonary carcinoid.

Authors:  Balasubramanian Venkitaraman; Sellam Karunanithi; Arvind Kumar; G C Khilnani; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Clinical applications of Gallium-68.

Authors:  Sangeeta Ray Banerjee; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 1.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.