Literature DB >> 24435349

Evaluating the evaluations of psychiatry residents.

E Chiang1, T L Bayer, J H Coverdale, J W Lomax.   

Abstract

This survey assessed the perceptions of psychiatry residents and faculty about resident evaluations. Current residents, former residents, and faculty of a psychiatry residency program were asked about the value and effect of feedback in 15 specific areas and rated their preferences for evaluation methods. Residents and faculty most valued feedback that addressed practical clinical skills. Evaluations reportedly improved skills in half of the areas surveyed. Most respondents preferred face-to-face evaluations from individual faculty. This study confirms the value of resident evaluations addressing clinical skills, but it highlights discrepancies in expectations and merits of several methods of evaluation.

Year:  1992        PMID: 24435349     DOI: 10.1007/BF03341385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Psychiatry        ISSN: 1042-9670


  9 in total

1.  Psychotherapy training for the psychiatrist of the future.

Authors:  P C Mohl; J Lomax; A Tasman; C Chan; W Sledge; P Summergrad; M Notman
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 2.  Professional issues for women.

Authors:  C C Nadelson
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  1989-03

3.  The advancement of women in academic medicine.

Authors:  J G Schaller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Survey of the evaluation methods used in child psychiatry training programs.

Authors:  J Lingas; S N Cohen; R Angell
Journal:  Can Psychiatr Assoc J       Date:  1976-04

5.  Ongoing evaluation in psychiatry: the first step toward quality.

Authors:  J F Borus; J Yager
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Evaluating the competence of trainees: it's nothing personal.

Authors:  R H Klein; R Babineau
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Feedback in clinical medical education.

Authors:  J Ende
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Two-year follow-up of a peer review training program for residents.

Authors:  F Kass; E Charles; P Buckley
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  House officer stress syndrome.

Authors:  G W Small
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 2.386

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.