Literature DB >> 24434706

Engaging with the political imaginaries of science: Near misses and future targets.

Helga Nowotny1.   

Abstract

The current economic and financial crisis is also a political crisis that requires a rethinking of public engagement with science. In the past, the dominant focus of science, technology and society (STS) has led to a blind spot: political understanding and engagement of policy-makers and politicians with science, which is an integral part of any public engagement. Arguably, it is bound to and emerges from what Ezrahi calls collective political imaginaries. These are necessary fictions, which are causative and performative. In crude form, they manifest themselves in short-term impact measurements of every unit of scientific activity with citizens as the fictitious ultimate beneficiaries. In the future, STS can gain from coming up with a workable definition of the public interest with a focus on the public value of science. It can investigate collective imaginaries as they emerge from interactions with new media. As necessary fictions they may hold answers we never imagined them to hold.

Keywords:  decision-making in science; governance of science and technology; interaction experts/ publics; participation in science policy; popularization of science; public understanding of science; scientific citizenship

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24434706     DOI: 10.1177/0963662513476220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  5 in total

1.  Maximizing the promise of citizen science to advance health and prevent disease.

Authors:  Abby C King; Sandra J Winter; Benjamin W Chrisinger; Jenna Hua; Ann W Banchoff
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Research impact: a narrative review.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; James Raftery; Steve Hanney; Matthew Glover
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 3.  The importance of values in evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Michael P Kelly; Iona Heath; Jeremy Howick; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 4.  Achieving Research Impact Through Co-creation in Community-Based Health Services: Literature Review and Case Study.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Claire Jackson; Sara Shaw; Tina Janamian
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Societal Sentience: Constructions of the Public in Animal Research Policy and Practice.

Authors:  Pru Hobson-West; Ashley Davies
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  2017-10-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.