Literature DB >> 24434287

Norway: health system review.

Ånen Ringard1, Anna Sagan2, Ingrid Sperre Saunes1, Anne Karin Lindahl1.   

Abstract

Norways five million inhabitants are spread over nearly four hundred thousand square kilometres, making it one of the most sparsely populated countries in Europe. It has enjoyed several decades of high growth, following the start of oil production in early 1970s, and is now one of the richest countries per head in the world. Overall, Norways population enjoys good health status; life expectancy of 81.53 years is above the EU average of 80.14, and the gap between overall life expectancy and healthy life years is around half the of EU average. The health care system is semi decentralized. The responsibility for specialist care lies with the state (administered by four Regional Health Authorities) and the municipalities are responsible for primary care. Although health care expenditure is only 9.4% of Norways GDP (placing it on the 16th place in the WHO European region), given Norways very high value of GDP per capita, its health expenditure per head is higher than in most countries. Public sources account for over 85% of total health expenditure; the majority of private health financing comes from households out-of-pocket payments.The number of practitioners in most health personnel groups, including physicians and nurses, has been increasing in the last few decades and the number of health care personnel per 100 000 inhabitants is high compared to other EU countries. However, long waiting times for elective care continue to be a problem and are cause of dissatisfaction among the patients. The focus of health care reforms has seen shifts over the past four decades. During the 1970s the focus was on equality and increasing geographical access to health care services; during the 1980s reforms aimed at achieving cost containment and decentralizing health care services; during the 1990s the focus was on efficiency. Since the beginning of the millennium the emphasis has been given to structural changes in the delivery and organization of health care and to policies intended to empower patients and users. The past few years have seen efforts to improve coordination between health care providers, as well as an increased attention towards quality of care and patient safety issues. Overall, comparing mortality rates amenable to medical intervention suggests that Norway is among the better performing European countries. Despite having one of the highest densities of physicians in Europe, though, Norway still struggles to ensure geographical and social equity in access to health care. World Health Organization 2013 (acting as the host organization for, and secretariat of, the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24434287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Syst Transit        ISSN: 1817-6119


  70 in total

1.  How to adapt caring services to migration-driven diversity? A qualitative study exploring challenges and possible adjustments in the care of people living with dementia.

Authors:  Mette Sagbakken; Reidun Ingebretsen; Ragnhild Storstein Spilker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Priority rules as solutions to conflicting health care rights.

Authors:  Anna-Karin Andersson; Frode Lindemark; Kjell Arne Johansson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-03

3.  Immigrants' utilization of specialist mental healthcare according to age, country of origin, and migration history: a nation-wide register study in Norway.

Authors:  Dawit Shawel Abebe; Lars Lien; Jon Ivar Elstad
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Municipal healthcare professionals' interprofessional collaboration during older patients' transitions in the municipal health and care services: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marianne Eika; Sigrun Hvalvik
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.908

5.  Norwegian Priority Setting in Practice - an Analysis of Waiting Time Patterns Across Medical Disciplines.

Authors:  Jurgita Januleviciute Gangstøe; Torhild Heggestad; Ole Frithjof Norheim
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-03-02

6.  Identifying exceptional malaria occurrences in the absence of historical data in South Sudan: a method validation.

Authors:  G Benedetti; R A White; H Akello Pasquale; J Stassijns; W van den Boogaard; P Owiti; R Van den Bergh
Journal:  Public Health Action       Date:  2019-09-21

7.  General practitioners' altered preferences for private practice vs. salaried positions: a consequence of proposed policy regulations?

Authors:  Jon Helgheim Holte; Birgit Abelsen; Peder Andreas Halvorsen; Jan Abel Olsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Feasibility, acceptability, and adherence of two educational programs for care staff concerning nursing home patients' fecal incontinence: a pilot study preceding a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lene Elisabeth Blekken; Sigrid Nakrem; Kari Hanne Gjeilo; Christine Norton; Siv Mørkved; Anne Guttormsen Vinsnes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Effect of a multifaceted educational program for care staff concerning fecal incontinence in nursing home patients: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lene Elisabeth Blekken; Anne Guttormsen Vinsnes; Kari Hanne Gjeilo; Siv Mørkved; Øyvind Salvesen; Christine Norton; Sigrid Nakrem
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  A randomised controlled study of the long-term effects of exercise training on mortality in elderly people: study protocol for the Generation 100 study.

Authors:  Dorthe Stensvold; Hallgeir Viken; Øivind Rognmo; Eirik Skogvoll; Sigurd Steinshamn; Lars J Vatten; Jeff S Coombes; Sigmund A Anderssen; Jon Magnussen; Jan Erik Ingebrigtsen; Maria A Fiatarone Singh; Arnulf Langhammer; Asbjørn Støylen; Jorunn L Helbostad; Ulrik Wisløff
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.