Literature DB >> 16996017

The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers.

David M Neyens1, Linda Ng Boyle.   

Abstract

Teenage drivers are overrepresented in crashes when compared to middle-aged drivers. Driver distraction is becoming a greater concern among this group as in-vehicle devices, opportunities for distractions, and teenage drivers' willingness to engage in these activities increase. The objective of this study was to determine how different distraction factors impact the crash types that are common among teenage drivers. A multinomial logit model was developed to predict the likelihood that a driver will be involved in one of three common crash types: an angular collision with a moving vehicle, a rear-end collision with a moving lead vehicle, and a collision with a fixed object. These crashes were evaluated in terms of four driver distraction categories: cognitive, cell phone related, in-vehicle, and passenger-related distractions. Different driver distractions have varying effects on teenage drivers' crash involvement. Teenage drivers that were distracted at an intersection by passengers or cognitively were more likely to be involved in rear-end and angular collisions when compared to fixed-object collisions. In-vehicle distractions resulted in a greater likelihood of a collision with a fixed object when compared to angular collisions. Cell phone distractions resulted in a higher likelihood of rear-end collision. The results from this study need to be evaluated with caution due to the limited number of distraction related cases available in the U.S. GES crash database. Implications for identifying and improving the reporting of driver distraction related factors are therefore discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16996017     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  8 in total

1.  Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008.

Authors:  Fernando A Wilson; Jim P Stimpson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Keep your eyes on the road: young driver crash risk increases according to duration of distraction.

Authors:  Bruce G Simons-Morton; Feng Guo; Sheila G Klauer; Johnathon P Ehsani; Anuj K Pradhan
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Prevalence of and factors associated with distraction among public transit bus drivers.

Authors:  Russell Griffin; Carrie Huisingh; Gerald McGwin
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.491

4.  The association between handheld phone bans and the prevalence of handheld phone conversations among young drivers in the United States.

Authors:  Motao Zhu; Toni M Rudisill; Steven Heeringa; David Swedler; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Differences in Factors Affecting Various Crash Types with High Numbers of Fatalities and Injuries in China.

Authors:  Yikai Chen; Kai Wang; Mark King; Jie He; Jianxun Ding; Qin Shi; Changjun Wang; Pingfan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prevalence and correlates of cell phone use among Texas drivers.

Authors:  Michelle L Wilkinson; Austin L Brown; Iman Moussa; R Sue Day
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2015-02-24

7.  Driving and Multitasking: The Good, the Bad, and the Dangerous.

Authors:  Menno Nijboer; Jelmer P Borst; Hedderik van Rijn; Niels A Taatgen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-08

8.  Distraction of cyclists: how does it influence their risky behaviors and traffic crashes?

Authors:  Sergio A Useche; Francisco Alonso; Luis Montoro; Cristina Esteban
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.