Literature DB >> 24432281

BReast Ecology Assessment in the STudy of local MicroFlora - Study Protocol.

Dana Mihaela Jianu1, Anca Streinu-Cercel2, Alexandru Blidaru3, Maria Filipescu4, Ioan Petre Florescu5, Ioana Berciu4, Oltjon Cobani6, Olga Dorobăţ7, Stefan Adrian Jianu8, Oana Streinu-Cercel8, Floria Stăniceanu9, Adrian Streinu-Cercel10.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent articles have described an endogenous breast flora, particularly in the nipple ducts, with potential implications in the outcome of aesthetic breast surgery. To characterize the ecology of the breast, we designed a study to assess the microbial species identified on the breast skin and parenchyma in patients undergoing breast surgical interventions.
METHODS: AFTER OBTAINING INFORMED CONSENT AND BACKGROUND DATA ON CONCURRENT DISEASES, PREVIOUS CONTACT WITH THE HOSPITAL SYSTEM AND PRIOR USE OF ANTIBIOTICS, SAMPLES ARE COLLECTED PREOPERATIVELY FROM THREE AREAS OF THE BREAST SKIN, BILATERALLY: the inframammary fold, the areola and the axilla, prior to decontamination. These samples will serve as positive controls and will aid in characterizing the normal breast skin flora. After preoperative decontamination, samples are again collected, to check for any residual bacterial flora and the nipple is sealed with Tegaderm (3M, USA) and betadine ointment, to reduce any putative bacterial load. Intraoperatively, samples are collected from: a) the incision line (dermal level): 1. superficially, 2. medium depth in the breast parenchyma, 3. deep parenchyma, and b) axillary parenchyma (where possible), together with a bioptic fragment. Postoperatively, a second nipple sample is collected. For secondary breast augmentation surgeries, capsular biopsy is also performed (where relevant), and the implants undergo sonication, to allow biofilm identification. In the laboratory, all samples are cultured on blood agar incubated with CO2, cystine lactose electrolyte deficient medium and Sabouraud gentamicin-chloramphenicol agar. For positive culture samples, the number of colonies and their morphologic characteristics are reported. Identification will be carried out with MALDI-TOF and VITEK (bioMérieux, France), yielding automated antibiotic sensitivity profiles. For all germs with sensitivity profiles differing from the wild-type strain, E-tests will be performed. Follow-up information on the postoperative evolution will be collected and analyzed for potential factors predictive of good evolution. DISCUSSION: This study will provide important information about the microflora of the breast skin, its sensitivity profile, and the degree of contamination of the nipple ducts and parenchyma, if any, addressing a scientific hypothesis insufficiently explored so far.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24432281      PMCID: PMC3882839          DOI: 10.11599/germs.2013.1029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Germs        ISSN: 2248-2997


  5 in total

1.  Clinical relevance of positive breast periprosthetic cultures without overt infection.

Authors:  D T Netscher; G Weizer; P Wigoda; L E Walker; J Thornby; D Bowen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  The breast: a clean-contaminated surgical site.

Authors:  Sophie Bartsich; Jeffrey A Ascherman; Susan Whittier; Caroline A Yao; Christine Rohde
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.283

3.  Pilot study of association of bacteria on breast implants with capsular contracture.

Authors:  Jose L Del Pozo; Nho V Tran; Paul M Petty; Craig H Johnson; Molly F Walsh; Uldis Bite; Ricky P Clay; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Kerryl E Piper; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  The NIH Human Microbiome Project.

Authors:  Jane Peterson; Susan Garges; Maria Giovanni; Pamela McInnes; Lu Wang; Jeffery A Schloss; Vivien Bonazzi; Jean E McEwen; Kris A Wetterstrand; Carolyn Deal; Carl C Baker; Valentina Di Francesco; T Kevin Howcroft; Robert W Karp; R Dwayne Lunsford; Christopher R Wellington; Tsegahiwot Belachew; Michael Wright; Christina Giblin; Hagit David; Melody Mills; Rachelle Salomon; Christopher Mullins; Beena Akolkar; Lisa Begg; Cindy Davis; Lindsey Grandison; Michael Humble; Jag Khalsa; A Roger Little; Hannah Peavy; Carol Pontzer; Matthew Portnoy; Michael H Sayre; Pamela Starke-Reed; Samir Zakhari; Jennifer Read; Bracie Watson; Mark Guyer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Antecedent treatment with different antibiotic agents as a risk factor for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus.

Authors:  Yehuda Carmeli; George M Eliopoulos; Matthew H Samore
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.883

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Response to "Commentary on: Microbiologic Safety of the Transareolar Approach in Breast Augmentation".

Authors:  Anca Streinu-Cercel; Dana Mihaela Jianu; Oana Săndulescu; Adrian Streinu-Cercel
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.283

2.  Abscess Drainage with or Without Antibiotics in Lactational Breast Abscess: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jiayue Luo; Tianzhu Long; Yuanxuan Cai; Yuan Teng; Zhe Fan; Zhen Liang; Cairong Zhu; Hongmin Ma; Guanhua Li
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 4.003

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.