Literature DB >> 24432190

SHOULD FISH TEST BE PERFORMED TO ALL PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER?

Hasan Mutlu1, Halit Karaca2, Zeki Akca3, Yasemin Altuner Torun4.   

Abstract

CerbB2 receptor determination is very important for the prognosis and treatment of breast cancer. The most used two methods for CerbB2 receptor determination are immunohistochemistry and FISH methods. FISH method is recommended for immunohistochemically CerbB2 (++) patient group. Therefore, even though the immunohistochemically CerbB2 (++) patients are in the same group, FISH test divides the results into two separate groups. Our study compared these two groups in terms of relaps duration. Total of 85 patients from The Kayseri Research and Training Hospital in Kayseri, Kayseri Erciyes University Hospital and Mersin State Hospital were included in this study. The relaps duration of the patients were determined and then compared statistically. When the mean disease free survival was compared for FISH(+) and FISH(-) groups, the mean DFS was 46±5 and 73±8 months. However, the median DFS was 38±9 months for the FISH positive group. No median PFS was reached for FISH (-) group. Immunohistochemically CerbB2 (++) breast cancer patients are considered as in the same group, however actually they have different prognostic features. Similarly, when the immunohistochemical tests and FISH tests are compared for CerbB2 positivity, different results are obtained. As a consequence of that, the therapy alternatives will be changed. Therefore, we conclude that the FISH test should be performed to all patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast Cancer; Cerb B2 (++); FISH; HER 2; Immunohistochemically CerbB2 staining

Year:  2013        PMID: 24432190      PMCID: PMC3888953          DOI: 10.5455/medscience.2013.02.8052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci (Turkey)


  24 in total

1.  HER-2 gene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) compared with fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in breast cancer-A study of two hundred cases.

Authors:  A Sáez; F J Andreu; M A Seguí; M L Baré; S Fernández; C Dinarés; M Rey
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Histopathologic characteristics predicting HER-2/neu amplification in breast cancer.

Authors:  Raquel Prati; Sophia K Apple; Jianbo He; Jeffrey A Gornbein; Helena R Chang
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Concordance between central and local laboratory HER2 testing from a community-based clinical study.

Authors:  Josina C Reddy; James D Reimann; Steven M Anderson; Pamela M Klein
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  IHC for Her2 with CBE356 antibody is a more accurate predictor of Her2 gene amplification by FISH than HercepTest in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  R Ainsworth; J M S Bartlett; J J Going; E A Mallon; A Forsyth; J Richmond; W Angerson; A Watters; B Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse.

Authors:  K David Voduc; Maggie C U Cheang; Scott Tyldesley; Karen Gelmon; Torsten O Nielsen; Hagen Kennecke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Evaluation of HER-2/neu oncogene status in breast tumors on tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Daohai Zhang; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Elaine Do; Thomas Choudary Putti; Evelyn S C Koay
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Assessment of HER-2/neu overexpression and/or gene amplification in breast carcinomas: should in situ hybridization be the method of choice?

Authors:  Torill Sauer; Gro Wiedswang; Ghania Boudjema; Hanne Christensen; Rolf Karesen
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.205

8.  Calibration of immunohistochemistry for assessment of HER2 in breast cancer: results of the French multicentre GEFPICS study.

Authors:  A Vincent-Salomon; G MacGrogan; J Couturier; L Arnould; Y Denoux; M Fiche; J Jacquemier; M-C Mathieu; F Penault-Llorca; C Rigaud; P Roger; I Treilleux; M-O Vilain; S Mathoulin-Pélissier; V Le Doussal
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  The HER4 cytoplasmic domain, but not its C terminus, inhibits mammary cell proliferation.

Authors:  Shu-Mang Feng; Carolyn I Sartor; Debra Hunter; Hong Zhou; Xihui Yang; Laura S Caskey; Ruth Dy; Rebecca S Muraoka-Cook; H Shelton Earp
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2007-05-15

10.  Disease-free survival according to degree of HER2 amplification for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with or without 1 year of trastuzumab: the HERA Trial.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Marion Procter; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Evandro de Azambuja; Urania Dafni; Josef Rueschoff; Bruce Jordan; Stella Dolci; Mark Abramovitz; Oliver Stoss; Giuseppe Viale; Richard D Gelber; Martine Piccart-Gebhart; Brian Leyland-Jones
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical therapy of hyaluronic acid combined with platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Wenxing Yu; Peng Xu; Guiling Huang; Lin Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Patterns of supraclavicular area failure after mastectomy in breast cancer patients: implications for target volume delineation.

Authors:  Pei-Cheng Lin; Xi-Jin Lin; Jin-Luan Li; Fei-Fei Lin; Qing-Yang Zhuang; Li-Rui Tang; Yun-Xia Huang; Xue-Qing Zhang; Jun-Xin Wu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.671

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.