Literature DB >> 16800975

Concordance between central and local laboratory HER2 testing from a community-based clinical study.

Josina C Reddy1, James D Reimann, Steven M Anderson, Pamela M Klein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer have an unfavorable prognosis. Trastuzumab improves survival when combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer and decreases the rate of disease relapse by 52% and the rate of death by 33% in women with HER2-overexpressing early-stage breast cancer. HER2 testing can be performed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and can be performed at local pathology laboratories or at central/reference laboratories. Because of the significant benefit seen with trastuzumab, it is critical to accurately identify women most likely to benefit. The method and the location of HER2 testing contribute to the accuracy of test results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HER-First, a prospective, community-based, phase IV study of first-line trastuzumab/taxane therapy, enrolled patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Retesting of all tumor specimens by HER2 IHC and FISH at a high-volume, experienced laboratory was required.
RESULTS: Concordance between local and central laboratory HER2 IHC testing was highest for local IHC 3+ samples (n = 377; 77%) and lowest for IHC 2+ samples (n = 184; 26%). Thirty-three percent of samples testing IHC 2+ at a local laboratory tested FISH-positive at the central laboratory. Concordance between HER2 IHC and FISH results was higher when both tests were performed at the central laboratory.
CONCLUSION: Accurate HER2 test results are critical to identify patients who are appropriate candidates for trastuzumab, a therapy with significant clinical benefits in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. These data show that HER2 testing is most accurate when performed at a high-volume reference laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16800975     DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2006.n.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  29 in total

1.  A Root Cause Analysis Into the High Error Rate in Clinical Immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Steven A Bogen
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2019-02-22

2.  Gene expression profiling in breast cancer.

Authors:  Belisario A Arango; Celine L Rivera; Stefan Glück
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Discordance between original and central laboratories in ER and HER2 results in a diverse, population-based sample.

Authors:  Jennifer J Griggs; Ann S Hamilton; Kendra L Schwartz; Weiqiang Zhao; Paul H Abrahamse; Dafydd G Thomas; Julie M Jorns; Rachel Jewell; Maria E Sibug Saber; Reina Haque; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  A novel quantitative immunohistochemistry method for precise protein measurements directly in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens: analytical performance measuring HER2.

Authors:  Kristian Jensen; Rikke Krusenstjerna-Hafstrøm; Jesper Lohse; Kenneth H Petersen; Helene Derand
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Free digital image analysis software helps to resolve equivocal scores in HER2 immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Henrik O Helin; Vilppu J Tuominen; Onni Ylinen; Heikki J Helin; Jorma Isola
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  HER2 testing on core needle biopsy specimens from primary breast cancers: interobserver reproducibility and concordance with surgically resected specimens.

Authors:  Hitoshi Tsuda; Masafumi Kurosumi; Shinobu Umemura; Sohei Yamamoto; Takayuki Kobayashi; Robert Yoshiyuki Osamura
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 7.  Guidelines for HER2 testing in breast cancer: a national consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM).

Authors:  Joan Albanell; Xavier Andreu; María José Calasanz; Angel Concha; José María Corominas; Tomás García-Caballero; José Antonio López; Fernando López-Ríos; Santiago Ramón y Cajal; Francisco J Vera-Sempere; Ramón Colomer; Miguel Martín; Emilio Alba; Antonio González-Martín; Antonio Llombart; Ana Lluch; José Palacios
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Clinical practice patterns and cost effectiveness of human epidermal growth receptor 2 testing strategies in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Deborah A Marshall; Jennifer S Haas; Elena B Elkin; Su-Ying Liang; Michael J Hassett; Ilia Ferrusi; Jane E Brock; Stephanie L Van Bebber
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  A single-tube quantitative assay for mRNA levels of hormonal and growth factor receptors in breast cancer specimens.

Authors:  Ayuko A Iverson; Cheryl Gillett; Paul Cane; Christopher D Santini; Thomas M Vess; Lauren Kam-Morgan; Alice Wang; Marcia Eisenberg; Charles M Rowland; Janice J Hessling; Samuel E Broder; John J Sninsky; Andrew Tutt; Steven Anderson; Sheng-Yung P Chang
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  An international study comparing conventional versus mRNA level testing (TargetPrint) for ER, PR, and HER2 status of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jelle Wesseling; Corrado Tinterri; Anna Sapino; Fabrizio Zanconati; Martijn Lutke-Holzik; Bichlien Nguyen; Kenneth B Deck; Patrizia Querzoli; Tiziana Perin; Carmela Giardina; Gerhard Seitz; Jean-Marc Guinebretière; Julie Barone; Laura Dekker; Femke de Snoo; Lisette Stork-Sloots; Paul Roepman; Toru Watanabe; Pino Cusumano
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.