Literature DB >> 24432055

Classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Dror Ovadia1.   

Abstract

In 1983 Howard King presented his classification system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) based on the experience with Harrington rod instrumentation. Curves were divided into five types and guidelines and recommendations for which levels should be instrumented were given to preserve motion as much as possible. As segmental instrumentation systems began to gain favor over the Harrington rods this system failed and led to the development of a new classification system which was presented by Lawrence Lenke in 2001. In order to define a curve type by the Lenke classification, one must identify the curve type, the lumbar modifier and, for the first time in any classification system for scoliosis, the sagittal profile was also included. The Lenke classification showed higher inter and intra-reliability compared to the King classification. It also provided a better and more reliable tool to assist surgeons in choosing the best method of treatment for each curve pattern. Although the Lenke classification is more comprehensive and reliable than the King classification it is still far from perfect. It does not address the rotational component of the deformity. New technologies which provide three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the spine may serve as a basis for a truly 3D classification of scoliosis and for new therapeutic concepts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Classification; King; Lenke

Year:  2012        PMID: 24432055      PMCID: PMC3566250          DOI: 10.1007/s11832-012-0459-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Orthop        ISSN: 1863-2521            Impact factor:   1.548


  11 in total

1.  Multisurgeon assessment of surgical decision-making in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: curve classification, operative approach, and fusion levels.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; T R Haher; M A Lapp; A A Merola; J Harms; H L Shufflebarger
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Multisurgeon assessment of coronal pattern classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: reliability and error analysis.

Authors:  Hannes Behensky; Karlmeinrad Giesinger; Michael Ogon; Martin Krismer; Behensky Hannes; Giesinger Karlmeinrad; Ogon Michael; Krismer Martin; Karlmeinrad Geisinger
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Choosing fusion levels in progressive thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  D R Knapp; C T Price; E T Jones; R W Coonrad; J C Flynn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Lumbar curve response in type II idiopathic scoliosis after posterior instrumentation of the thoracic curve.

Authors:  B S Richards
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the system of King et al. for the classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  R J Cummings; E A Loveless; J Campbell; S Samelson; J M Mazur
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  H A King; J H Moe; D S Bradford; R B Winter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Results of spinal instrumentation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by King type.

Authors:  D P Roye; J P Farcy; J B Rickert; D Godfried
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Classification of scoliosis deformity three-dimensional spinal shape by cluster analysis.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; Archana P Sangole; Carl-Eric Aubin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Factors involved in the decision to perform a selective versus nonselective fusion of Lenke 1B and 1C (King-Moe II) curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Peter O Newton; Frances D Faro; Lawrence G Lenke; Randal R Betz; David H Clements; Thomas G Lowe; Thomas R Haher; Andrew A Merola; Linda P D'Andrea; Michelle Marks; Dennis R Wenger
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Three-dimensional classification of thoracic scoliotic curves.

Authors:  Archana P Sangole; Carl-Eric Aubin; Hubert Labelle; Ian A F Stokes; Lawrence G Lenke; Roger Jackson; Peter Newton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treatment by a Korean Neurosurgeon: The Changing Role for Neurosurgeons.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Woong-Beom Kim; Young-Seop Park; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Yongjung J Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-07-31

2.  New sagittal classification of AIS: validation by 3D characterization.

Authors:  Mareille Post; Stephane Verdun; Pierre Roussouly; Kariman Abelin-Genevois
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Adolescent scoliosis : From deformity to treatment].

Authors:  A Schulze; S Schrading; M Betsch; V Quack; M Tingart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis for the impact of rod materials and sizes in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Dawn Bowden; Annalisa Michielli; Michelle Merrill; Steven Will
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-23

5.  Transient fixation of L4 vertebra preserves lumbar motion and function in Lenke Type 5C and 6C scoliosis.

Authors:  Jae-Ho Yang; Jae-Won Shin; Sub-Ri Park; Sun-Kyu Kim; Sang-Jun Park; Ji-Hwan Min; Byoung-Ho Lee; Kyung-Soo Suk; Jin-Oh Park; Seong-Hwan Moon; Hwan-Mo Lee; Hak-Sun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Daniel Addai; Jacqueline Zarkos; Andrew James Bowey
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Towards a validated patient-specific computational modeling framework to identify failure regions in traditional growing rods in patients with early onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Aakash Agarwal; Manoj Kodigudla; Amey Kelkar; Daksh Jayaswal; Vijay Goel; Vivek Palepu
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2020-12-13

8.  Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery Is a Feasible Option for Management of Idiopathic Scoliosis and Has Equivalent Outcomes to Open Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Abduljabbar Alhammoud; Yahya Alborno; Abdul Moeen Baco; Yahya Azhar Othman; Yoji Ogura; Michael Steinhaus; Evan D Sheha; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-02-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.