Literature DB >> 24431853

Maxillary movement in cleft patients treated with internal tooth borne distractor.

C Sunitha1, R Gunaseelan1, V Anusha1, Kanna Peruman1.   

Abstract

Cleft lip and palate is associated with maxillary hypoplasia and retrognathism. Surgery and distraction have been the most common treatment approaches used. The aim of this study was to objectively assess the quantum and direction of movement of the anterior maxilla in cleft patients treated with an internal tooth borne distractor. A prospective clinical study design was followed in which 8 consecutive patients with cleft maxillary hypoplasia were included in the age range of 15-25 years. All patients had undergone secondary alveolar bone grafting earlier. Anterior maxillary distraction was performed using a tooth borne appliance in all 8 patients after necessary osteotomy. Lateral cephalograms were obtained preoperatively, predistraction and postdistraction. The angular and linear change at the maxillary anterior segment, rotation of the palatal plane, mandibular plane, increase in lower facial height and vertical changes of the anterior and posterior dentoalveolar segments were measured. The movement of the anterior maxillary segment was demonstrated anteriorly and superiorly in all the patients. The anterior and posterior dentoalveolar heights were increased post-distraction. There was also an increase in lower anterior facial height and the mandibular plane angle. Predictable superior and anterior movement of the anterior maxilla along with significant increase in palatal length could be achieved with the internal tooth borne distractor leading to remarkable improvement in esthetics and better function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cleft palate; Internal tooth borne distractors; Maxillary distraction

Year:  2012        PMID: 24431853      PMCID: PMC3777027          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-012-0431-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  9 in total

1.  Long-term results of distraction osteogenesis of the maxilla and midface.

Authors:  J Wiltfang; U Hirschfelder; F W Neukam; P Kessler
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.651

2.  A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  L K Cheung; H D P Chua
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Maxillary advancement with internal distraction device in cleft palate patients.

Authors:  Ayse Gulsen; Selahattin Ozmen; Serhan Tuncer; Belma Isik Aslan; Selin Kale; Reha Yavuzer
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Anterior maxillary distraction by tooth-borne palatal distractor.

Authors:  Rajan Gunaseelan; Lim K Cheung; Rangarajan Krishnaswamy; Muthusubramanian Veerabahu
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Long-term follow-up after maxillary distraction osteogenesis in growing children with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Chiung-Shing Huang; Pandurangan Harikrishnan; Yu-Fang Liao; Ellen W C Ko; Eric J W Liou; Philip K T Chen
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2007-05

6.  Improved outcomes in cleft patients with severe maxillary deficiency after Le Fort I internal distraction.

Authors:  Anand Kumar; Joubin S Gabbay; Rabin Nikjoo; Justin B Heller; Catherine M O'Hara; Manisha Sisodia; J I Garri; Libby S Wilson; Henry K Kawamoto; James P Bradley
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device.

Authors:  J W Polley; A A Figueroa
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Soft tissue profile changes after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis by use of a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  E Wen-Ching Ko; A A Figueroa; J W Polley
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Long-term results in maxillary deficiency using intraoral devices.

Authors:  A Rachmiel; D Aizenbud; M Peled
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.789

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Photometric Evaluation of Soft Tissue Changes in CLP Patients: Le Fort I Advancement Osteotomy (ALO) Versus Anterior Maxillary Distraction (AMD).

Authors:  Joby Paulose; Eldho Markose
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-30

2.  Perpendicular serial maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients.

Authors:  Leena P Ylikontiola; George K Sándor; Virpi Harila
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.