Literature DB >> 17477762

Long-term follow-up after maxillary distraction osteogenesis in growing children with cleft lip and palate.

Chiung-Shing Huang1, Pandurangan Harikrishnan, Yu-Fang Liao, Ellen W C Ko, Eric J W Liou, Philip K T Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in maxillary position after maxillary distraction osteogenesis in six growing children with cleft lip and palate.
DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal study on maxillary changes at A point, anterior nasal spine, posterior nasal spine, central incisor, and first molar.
SETTING: The University Hospital Craniofacial Center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cephalometric radiographs were used to measure the maxillary position immediately after distraction, at 6 months, and more than 1 year after distraction.
RESULTS: After maxillary distraction with a rigid external distraction device, the maxilla (A point) on average moved forward 9.7 mm and downward 3.5 mm immediately after distraction, moved backward 0.9 mm and upward 2.0 mm after 6 months postoperatively, and then moved further backward 2.3 mm and downward 6.8 mm after more than 1 year from the predistraction position.
CONCLUSION: In most cases, maxilla moved forward at distraction and started to move backward until 1 year after distraction, but remained forward, as compared with predistraction position. Maxilla also moved downward during distraction and upward in 6 months, but started descending in 1 year. There also was no further forward growth of the maxilla after distraction in growing children with clefts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17477762     DOI: 10.1597/06-104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  5 in total

1.  Maxillary movement in cleft patients treated with internal tooth borne distractor.

Authors:  C Sunitha; R Gunaseelan; V Anusha; Kanna Peruman
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-09-11

Review 2.  Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients.

Authors:  Humam Saltaji; Michael P Major; Mostafa Altalibi; Mohamed Youssef; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Profile Changes and Stability following Distraction Osteogenesis with Rigid External Distraction in Adult Cleft Lip and Palate Deformities.

Authors:  Jaeson M Painatt; Ravi Veeraraghavan; Ushass Puthalath; Sherry Peter; Latha P Rao; Maria Kuriakose
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

4.  A Comparative Study of Skeletal and Dental Outcome between Transcutaneous External Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis and Conventional Rigid External Device in Treating Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.

Authors:  Chi-Yu Tsai; Yi-Hao Lee; Te-Ju Wu; Shiu-Shiung Lin; Jui-Pin Lai; Yu-Jen Chang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-29

5.  Treatment outcome and long-term stability of skeletal changes following maxillary distraction in adult subjects of cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Satinder Pal Singh; Ashok Kumar Jena; Vidya Rattan; Ashok Kumar Utreja
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.