Literature DB >> 24431803

Extra oral cementation of implant prosthesis: a case report.

Rita Singh1, Lanka Mahesh2, Sagrika Shukla2.   

Abstract

Extraoral cementation is a technique that utilizes a stock abutment and a laboratory fabricated crown that is cemented extra orally; the advantage of this technique is that the retained excess luting agent during intraoral cementation, which can be a source of bacterial retention and cannot be observed radio graphically and is not possible to remove with explorer all the time, does not get accumulated and can be trimmed off easily before the final placement of the crown. Thus this technique allows no retention of luting cement, providing better soft tissue contours, no soft tissue inflammation, no retention of plaque and no bone loss. In short it prevents implant failure related to retained cement around implants. This technique provides overall health of peri-implant soft tissues as compared to conventional technique of crown placement where cement retention is a common problem, leading to implant failures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extra oral cementation; Healthy peri-implant soft tissues; Laboratory fabricated crown; Stock abutment

Year:  2013        PMID: 24431803      PMCID: PMC3792311          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-013-0319-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  7 in total

1.  Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report.

Authors:  N Pauletto; B J Lahiffe; J N Walton
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  3-year followup study of early single implant restorations ad modum Brånemark.

Authors:  T Jemt; U Lekholm; K Gröndahl
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  An analysis of the effect of a vent hole on excess cement expressed at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant crowns.

Authors:  Dipan Patel; James C F Invest; Christopher J Tredwin; Derrick J Setchell; David R Moles
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Peri-implant soft-tissue health surrounding cement- and screw-retained implant restorations: a multi-center, 3-year prospective study.

Authors:  Hans P Weber; David M Kim; Mavis W Ng; Jae W Hwang; Joseph P Fiorellini
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 5.  Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry.

Authors:  K S Hebel; R C Gajjar
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Clinical evaluation of single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants: a retrospective study.

Authors:  A Ekfeldt; G E Carlsson; G Börjesson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins.

Authors:  N P Lang; R A Kiel; K Anderhalden
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 8.728

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.