Literature DB >> 15775925

Effect of glazed and polished surface finishes on the friction coefficient of two low-fusing ceramics.

Christian Schuh1, Eder Julio Kinast, Elio Mezzomo, Myriam Pereira Kapczinski.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: All-ceramic and metal-ceramic dental restorations are potentially harmful because they may wear opposing enamel. Wear is a multifactorial process; however, laboratory procedures can minimize the wear process, thus benefiting clinicians and manufacturers.
PURPOSE: This in vitro investigation of wear evaluated the physical and tribological characteristics of 2 low-fusing ceramics and dental enamel.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of 2 low-fusing ceramics (IPS d.Sign and Vita Omega 900) and enamel were performed using scanning electron microscopy, x-ray diffraction, and energy-dispersive analyses. Each ceramic was tested using 20 disks (10 mm x 3 mm), of which 10 were glazed and 10 were polished. Ten polished enamel specimens (6 mm x 7 mm) served as the control. The specimens were submitted to a Vickers hardness test for 30 seconds using a 200 g load. The coefficient of friction was determined by using a pin-on-disk test without lubrication (5 N load, 600 seconds, 120 RPM). The data were analyzed using a 1-way analysis of variance and Sheffe analysis (alpha=.05).
RESULTS: The same chemical elements were found in both ceramics, and tetragonal leucite was the main component of the crystalline phases. The microhardness of the enamel was significantly different ( P <.05) between the glazed and polished ceramics. There was no significant difference found in the friction coefficient (mean +/- SD) of the enamel (0.286 +/- 0.174), glazed Vita Omega 900 (0.309 +/- 0.085), and glazed IPS d.Sign (0.253 +/- 0.068) specimens. The mean friction coefficient of the polished Vita Omega 900 (0.486 +/- 0.036) and IPS d.Sign (0.446 +/- 0.037) specimens was found to be significantly higher than the enamel and glazed specimens ( P <.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both ceramics tested presented similar chemical-structural and tribological characteristics. When glazed, they showed tribological similarity to dental enamel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15775925     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  7 in total

1.  Adhesion of oral streptococci to all-ceramics dental restorative materials in vitro.

Authors:  R Meier; I Hauser-Gerspach; H Lüthy; J Meyer
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  An in vitro investigation to compare the surface roughness of auto glazed, reglazed and chair side polished surfaces of Ivoclar and Vita feldspathic porcelain.

Authors:  Sumit Sethi; Dilip Kakade; Shantanu Jambhekar; Vinay Jain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-12-14

3.  Wear behavior of pressable lithium disilicate glass ceramic.

Authors:  Zhongxiao Peng; Muhammad Izzat Abdul Rahman; Yu Zhang; Ling Yin
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 4.  Advancements in all-ceramics for dental restorations and their effect on the wear of opposing dentition.

Authors:  Haroon Rashid; Zeeshan Sheikh; Syed Misbahuddin; Murtaza Raza Kazmi; Sameer Qureshi; Muhammad Zuhaib Uddin
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

5.  An In vitro Evaluation to Compare the Surface Roughness of Glazed, Reglazed and Chair Side Polished Surfaces of Dental Porcelain.

Authors:  Varsha Rani; Sanjeev Mittal; Urvashi Sukhija
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2021-06-14

6.  Effect of two different finishing systems on surface roughness of feldspathic and fluorapatite porcelains in ceramo-metal restorations: Comparative in vitro study.

Authors:  Cherry Anmol; Sumeet Soni
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2014-01

7.  Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials.

Authors:  Seunglee Jin; Jae-Won Choi; Chang-Mo Jeong; Jung-Bo Huh; So-Hyoun Lee; Hyeonjong Lee; Mi-Jung Yun
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.